[Analysis of the forensic medical examinations features in dentistry based on the study of judicial practice for 2013-2022].

Q4 Medicine
S N Andreeva, O O Salagai
{"title":"[Analysis of the forensic medical examinations features in dentistry based on the study of judicial practice for 2013-2022].","authors":"S N Andreeva,&nbsp;O O Salagai","doi":"10.17116/sudmed2023660115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the study of forensic medical examinations conducted in 2013-2022 in cases related to poor-quality dental care, the main features of the implementation of expert assessments were identified. The most common (in 46% of cases) assessment of comprehensive dental care is carried out. In 6% of cases, claims are made to 2-5 medical organizations at once. In 15-20% of cases, during the forensic medical examination, the condition in the oral cavity has already been changed by subsequent dental treatment. In the course of the study, it was determined that payments from dental organizations are on average 10 times higher than the cost of treatment and account to about 40% of the amounts requested by patients in claims. In 15% of cases, forensic medical examination was carried out on dental care provided within the framework of state guarantees of free medical care. Claims for compensation for moral damage were contained in 97% of cases, in 56% of cases the court confirmed their validity. The growth rate of cases where claims for compensation for moral damage were satisfied for 10 years amounted to 36%. The amount of compensation payments has increased. The revealed features of judicial practice in dentistry necessitate the development of objective, evidence-based, reproducible assessments and the introduction of evaluation criteria in clinical recommendations for the relevant nosology.</p>","PeriodicalId":35704,"journal":{"name":"Sudebno-Meditsinskaya Ekspertisa","volume":"66 1","pages":"5-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sudebno-Meditsinskaya Ekspertisa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/sudmed2023660115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

During the study of forensic medical examinations conducted in 2013-2022 in cases related to poor-quality dental care, the main features of the implementation of expert assessments were identified. The most common (in 46% of cases) assessment of comprehensive dental care is carried out. In 6% of cases, claims are made to 2-5 medical organizations at once. In 15-20% of cases, during the forensic medical examination, the condition in the oral cavity has already been changed by subsequent dental treatment. In the course of the study, it was determined that payments from dental organizations are on average 10 times higher than the cost of treatment and account to about 40% of the amounts requested by patients in claims. In 15% of cases, forensic medical examination was carried out on dental care provided within the framework of state guarantees of free medical care. Claims for compensation for moral damage were contained in 97% of cases, in 56% of cases the court confirmed their validity. The growth rate of cases where claims for compensation for moral damage were satisfied for 10 years amounted to 36%. The amount of compensation payments has increased. The revealed features of judicial practice in dentistry necessitate the development of objective, evidence-based, reproducible assessments and the introduction of evaluation criteria in clinical recommendations for the relevant nosology.

[基于2013-2022年司法实践研究的牙科法医学鉴定特点分析]。
在研究2013-2022年期间对与劣质牙科护理有关的案件进行的法医检查期间,确定了实施专家评估的主要特点。最常见的(46%的病例)是进行全面牙科保健评估。在6%的案件中,一次向2-5个医疗组织提出索赔。在15-20%的案件中,在法医检查期间,口腔的状况已经因随后的牙科治疗而改变。在研究过程中,确定牙科机构支付的费用平均比治疗费用高10倍,约占患者索赔要求金额的40%。在15%的案件中,对国家免费医疗保障框架内提供的牙科护理进行了法医检查。在97%的案件中包含了精神损害赔偿的要求,在56%的案件中法院确认了其有效性。10年间精神损害赔偿要求得到满足的案件增长率达36%。赔偿金额有所增加。牙科司法实践的特点要求开展客观的、循证的、可重复的评估,并在相关分类学的临床推荐中引入评估标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sudebno-Meditsinskaya Ekspertisa
Sudebno-Meditsinskaya Ekspertisa Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The journal is concerned with the theory and practice of forensic medicine - the problems of thanatology, traumatology, toxicology, serology, forensic obstetrics, forensic dentistry, forensic psychiatry, forensic chemistry, physicotechnical methods of investigation, history of forensic medicine and some problems of criminology and legal laws related to forensic medicine. It publishes original studies by Russian authors, casuistry surveys, abstracts and reviews of Russian and foreign literature, scientific information, reports on scientific conferences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信