Surveillance tools for detection of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An evidence-based review and recommendations.

Q2 Medicine
Andrew Thamboo, Kim H Tran, Annette X Ye, Issraa Shoucair, Basel Jabarin, Eitan Prisman, Cathie Garnis
{"title":"Surveillance tools for detection of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An evidence-based review and recommendations.","authors":"Andrew Thamboo,&nbsp;Kim H Tran,&nbsp;Annette X Ye,&nbsp;Issraa Shoucair,&nbsp;Basel Jabarin,&nbsp;Eitan Prisman,&nbsp;Cathie Garnis","doi":"10.1016/j.wjorl.2020.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Nasopharyngeal carcinomas (NPC) are tumors arising from epithelium of the nasopharynx. The 5-year survival rate of primary NPC is 80% with significant risks of recurrence. The objective here is to provide an evidence-based systemic review of the diagnostic value of different modalities in detecting local, regional, and distal recurrent NPC, as well as the associated costs with these modalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane review database were queried. Two hundred and twenty-three abstracts were generated using the inclusion criteria: patients >18 years of age; histopathological reference standard; and modalities pertaining to imaging or microbiology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four manuscripts fulfilled the inclusion criteria and 5 surveillance tools identified: endoscopy, MR, FDG-PET, Tc-99m MIBI and <sup>201</sup>TI SPECT, and EBV DNA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For local surveillance, endoscopy is the gold standard recommendation, with increased efficacy if Narrow Band Imaging or contact endoscopy are utilized. MRI and FDG-PET is also recommended to help with local to distal spread; however, Tc-99m MIBI and <sup>201</sup>TI SPECT are options as well. EBV DNA is recommended as a cheap and accessible adjunct surveillance tool if an available as an option.</p>","PeriodicalId":32097,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","volume":"8 3","pages":"187-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wjorl.2020.12.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wjorl.2020.12.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Nasopharyngeal carcinomas (NPC) are tumors arising from epithelium of the nasopharynx. The 5-year survival rate of primary NPC is 80% with significant risks of recurrence. The objective here is to provide an evidence-based systemic review of the diagnostic value of different modalities in detecting local, regional, and distal recurrent NPC, as well as the associated costs with these modalities.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane review database were queried. Two hundred and twenty-three abstracts were generated using the inclusion criteria: patients >18 years of age; histopathological reference standard; and modalities pertaining to imaging or microbiology.

Results: Twenty-four manuscripts fulfilled the inclusion criteria and 5 surveillance tools identified: endoscopy, MR, FDG-PET, Tc-99m MIBI and 201TI SPECT, and EBV DNA.

Conclusions: For local surveillance, endoscopy is the gold standard recommendation, with increased efficacy if Narrow Band Imaging or contact endoscopy are utilized. MRI and FDG-PET is also recommended to help with local to distal spread; however, Tc-99m MIBI and 201TI SPECT are options as well. EBV DNA is recommended as a cheap and accessible adjunct surveillance tool if an available as an option.

用于检测复发性鼻咽癌的监测工具:基于证据的回顾和建议。
目的:鼻咽癌是发生于鼻咽上皮的肿瘤。原发性鼻咽癌的5年生存率为80%,有明显的复发风险。本文的目的是对不同方式在检测局部、区域和远端复发性鼻咽癌中的诊断价值,以及与这些方式相关的成本,提供基于证据的系统综述。方法:对MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane综述数据库进行查询。采用纳入标准生成223篇摘要:患者>18岁;组织病理学参考标准;以及与成像或微生物学有关的模式。结果:24篇文章符合纳入标准,并确定了5种监测工具:内镜、MR、FDG-PET、Tc-99m MIBI和201TI SPECT,以及EBV DNA。结论:对于局部监测,内窥镜检查是金标准推荐,如果使用窄带成像或接触式内窥镜检查,其疗效会提高。MRI和FDG-PET也被推荐用于帮助局部到远端扩散;然而,Tc-99m MIBI和201TI SPECT也是选项。如果可以作为一种选择,建议将EBV DNA作为一种廉价和可获得的辅助监测工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信