Under- or overexpansion of education? Trends in qualification mismatch in the United Kingdom and Germany, 1984–2017

IF 3.2 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY
Jonas Wiedner
{"title":"Under- or overexpansion of education? Trends in qualification mismatch in the United Kingdom and Germany, 1984–2017","authors":"Jonas Wiedner","doi":"10.1016/j.ssresearch.2023.102948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Prominent theoretical positions in sociology and labor economics disagree whether educational expansion has outstripped the demand for qualified labor (overexpansion), or whether economies face a skill shortage despite increases in education (underexpansion). Focusing on the United Kingdom and West Germany, two countries with dissimilar skill formation institutions, patterns of expansion, and labor markets, this paper asks to what degree expansion of education has been absorbed. I point out shortcomings of wage-centered analyses and develop an approach that focuses on trends in self-assessed over- and underqualification. Using repeated surveys among workers and official labor market statistics, I estimate regression models that link the cohort-level expansion of education to the cohort-level prevalence of mismatch. Results suggest overexpansion in the United Kingdom, with overqualification increasing and underqualification decreasing over historical times and cohorts. West Germany, on the other hand, shows signs of underexpansion. While dominant theoretical accounts focus on the under-/overexpansion of tertiary education, my results show that mismatch-dynamics in both contexts are strongest for workers without university degrees.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48338,"journal":{"name":"Social Science Research","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 102948"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X23001035/pdfft?md5=9de949b78eecec61c23b4b4c9961a980&pid=1-s2.0-S0049089X23001035-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X23001035","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prominent theoretical positions in sociology and labor economics disagree whether educational expansion has outstripped the demand for qualified labor (overexpansion), or whether economies face a skill shortage despite increases in education (underexpansion). Focusing on the United Kingdom and West Germany, two countries with dissimilar skill formation institutions, patterns of expansion, and labor markets, this paper asks to what degree expansion of education has been absorbed. I point out shortcomings of wage-centered analyses and develop an approach that focuses on trends in self-assessed over- and underqualification. Using repeated surveys among workers and official labor market statistics, I estimate regression models that link the cohort-level expansion of education to the cohort-level prevalence of mismatch. Results suggest overexpansion in the United Kingdom, with overqualification increasing and underqualification decreasing over historical times and cohorts. West Germany, on the other hand, shows signs of underexpansion. While dominant theoretical accounts focus on the under-/overexpansion of tertiary education, my results show that mismatch-dynamics in both contexts are strongest for workers without university degrees.

教育扩张不足还是过度?1984-2017年英国和德国学历不匹配趋势
社会学和劳动经济学的主要理论立场不同意教育扩张是否已经超过了对合格劳动力的需求(过度扩张),或者经济是否面临技能短缺尽管教育增加(扩张不足)。本文以英国和西德这两个拥有不同技能形成制度、扩张模式和劳动力市场的国家为研究对象,探讨教育扩张在多大程度上被吸收。我指出了以工资为中心的分析的缺点,并开发了一种方法,重点关注自我评估的资历过高和资历不足的趋势。通过对工人和官方劳动力市场统计数据的重复调查,我估计了回归模型,该模型将队列水平的教育扩张与队列水平的不匹配流行联系起来。结果表明,在英国的过度扩张,随着历史时间和群体的增加,资格过高和资格不足的减少。另一方面,西德则显示出经济扩张不足的迹象。虽然主流理论关注的是高等教育扩张不足/过度,但我的研究结果表明,在这两种情况下,没有大学学位的工人的错配动力最强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Social Science Research publishes papers devoted to quantitative social science research and methodology. The journal features articles that illustrate the use of quantitative methods in the empirical solution of substantive problems, and emphasizes those concerned with issues or methods that cut across traditional disciplinary lines. Special attention is given to methods that have been used by only one particular social science discipline, but that may have application to a broader range of areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信