On constraining 3D seismic anisotropy in subduction, mid-ocean-ridge, and plume environments with teleseismic body wave data

IF 2.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Manuele Faccenda, Brandon P. VanderBeek
{"title":"On constraining 3D seismic anisotropy in subduction, mid-ocean-ridge, and plume environments with teleseismic body wave data","authors":"Manuele Faccenda,&nbsp;Brandon P. VanderBeek","doi":"10.1016/j.jog.2023.102003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Conventional seismic tomography studies consider the Earth’s interior as mechanically isotropic, despite seismic anisotropy being widely observed. This current standard approach to seismic imaging is likely to lead to significant artefacts in tomographic images with first-order effects on interpretations and hinders the quantitative integration of seismology with geodynamic flow models. Although a few methodologies have been proposed for carrying out anisotropic tomography, their ability in simultaneously recovering isotropic and anisotropic structures has not been rigorously tested. In this contribution we use geodynamic and seismological modeling to predict the elastic properties and synthetic teleseismic P- and S-wave travel-time datasets for three different tectonic settings: a plume rising in an intraplate setting, a divergent margin, and a subduction zone. Subsequently, we perform seismic anisotropy tomography testing a recently developed methodology that allows for the inversion of an arbitrarily oriented weakly anisotropic hexagonally symmetric medium using multiple body-wave datasets. The tomography experiments indicate that anisotropic inversions of separate and joint P- and S-wave travel-times are capable of recovering the first order isotropic velocity anomalies and anisotropic patterns. In particular, joint P- and S-wave anisotropic inversions show that by leveraging both phases it is possible to greatly mitigate issues related to imperfect data coverage common in seismology and reduce parameter trade-offs. In contrast, by neglecting seismic anisotropy, isotropic tomographic models provide no information on the mantle fabrics and in all cases are contaminated by strong velocity artifacts. In the inversions the magnitude of anisotropy (as well as that of seismic anomalies) is always underestimated owing to regularization procedures and smearing effects. It follows that the true seismic anisotropy of mantle rocks is likely higher than estimated from anisotropic tomographies, and more consistent with predictions from laboratory and numerical micro-mechanical experiments. Altogether, these results suggest that anisotropic body-wave tomography could provide unprecedented information about the Earth’s deep geological structure, and that the latter could be better recovered by complementing teleseismic body-wave travel-times with other geophysical datasets.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54823,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodynamics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264370723000431/pdfft?md5=e6a25cf4922780eba6953f4420e78460&pid=1-s2.0-S0264370723000431-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264370723000431","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Conventional seismic tomography studies consider the Earth’s interior as mechanically isotropic, despite seismic anisotropy being widely observed. This current standard approach to seismic imaging is likely to lead to significant artefacts in tomographic images with first-order effects on interpretations and hinders the quantitative integration of seismology with geodynamic flow models. Although a few methodologies have been proposed for carrying out anisotropic tomography, their ability in simultaneously recovering isotropic and anisotropic structures has not been rigorously tested. In this contribution we use geodynamic and seismological modeling to predict the elastic properties and synthetic teleseismic P- and S-wave travel-time datasets for three different tectonic settings: a plume rising in an intraplate setting, a divergent margin, and a subduction zone. Subsequently, we perform seismic anisotropy tomography testing a recently developed methodology that allows for the inversion of an arbitrarily oriented weakly anisotropic hexagonally symmetric medium using multiple body-wave datasets. The tomography experiments indicate that anisotropic inversions of separate and joint P- and S-wave travel-times are capable of recovering the first order isotropic velocity anomalies and anisotropic patterns. In particular, joint P- and S-wave anisotropic inversions show that by leveraging both phases it is possible to greatly mitigate issues related to imperfect data coverage common in seismology and reduce parameter trade-offs. In contrast, by neglecting seismic anisotropy, isotropic tomographic models provide no information on the mantle fabrics and in all cases are contaminated by strong velocity artifacts. In the inversions the magnitude of anisotropy (as well as that of seismic anomalies) is always underestimated owing to regularization procedures and smearing effects. It follows that the true seismic anisotropy of mantle rocks is likely higher than estimated from anisotropic tomographies, and more consistent with predictions from laboratory and numerical micro-mechanical experiments. Altogether, these results suggest that anisotropic body-wave tomography could provide unprecedented information about the Earth’s deep geological structure, and that the latter could be better recovered by complementing teleseismic body-wave travel-times with other geophysical datasets.

用远震体波资料约束俯冲、洋中脊和羽流环境的三维地震各向异性
传统的地震层析成像研究认为地球内部是机械各向同性的,尽管地震各向异性被广泛观察到。目前这种标准的地震成像方法很可能导致层析成像中出现严重的伪影,对解释有一阶影响,并阻碍了地震学与地球动力学流模型的定量整合。虽然已经提出了一些进行各向异性层析成像的方法,但它们同时恢复各向同性和各向异性结构的能力尚未经过严格的测试。在这篇论文中,我们使用地球动力学和地震学建模来预测三种不同构造环境下的弹性特性和合成远震P波和s波走时数据集:在板内环境中上升的羽流、辐散边缘和俯冲带。随后,我们进行了地震各向异性层析成像测试,该方法允许使用多个体波数据集对任意定向弱各向异性六边形对称介质进行反演。层析成像实验表明,对独立和联合的纵波和横波行时进行各向异性反演能够恢复一阶各向同性速度异常和各向异性模式。特别是,P波和s波各向异性联合反演表明,通过利用这两个阶段,可以大大缓解地震学中常见的数据覆盖不完善的问题,并减少参数权衡。相反,由于忽略了地震各向异性,各向同性层析模型不能提供有关地幔结构的信息,而且在所有情况下都受到强速度伪影的污染。在反演中,各向异性(以及地震异常)的量级由于正则化过程和涂抹效应总是被低估。由此可见,地幔岩石的真实地震各向异性可能比各向异性层析成像估计的要高,并且更符合实验室和数值微力学实验的预测。总之,这些结果表明,各向异性体波层析成像可以提供有关地球深部地质结构的前所未有的信息,而后者可以通过与其他地球物理数据集补充远震体波传播时间来更好地恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geodynamics
Journal of Geodynamics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geodynamics is an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication of results and discussions of solid earth research in geodetic, geophysical, geological and geochemical geodynamics, with special emphasis on the large scale processes involved.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信