Compensatory eating disorder and full threshold DSM eating disorders: A comparison of eating-disorder-related psychiatric impairment and symptomatology

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Sonakshi Negi, Marianna L. Thomeczek, Yiyang Chen, Anjali R. Sharma, Kelsie T. Forbush
{"title":"Compensatory eating disorder and full threshold DSM eating disorders: A comparison of eating-disorder-related psychiatric impairment and symptomatology","authors":"Sonakshi Negi,&nbsp;Marianna L. Thomeczek,&nbsp;Yiyang Chen,&nbsp;Anjali R. Sharma,&nbsp;Kelsie T. Forbush","doi":"10.1016/j.eatbeh.2023.101823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span><span><span>Compensatory eating disorder (CED) is a newly proposed ‘other specified feeding and eating disorder’ characterized by recurrent non-purging compensatory </span>behaviors<span> (e.g., compulsive exercise and/or food restriction), overvaluation of weight/shape, the absence of objective binge-eating episodes, and the absence of low weight or recent significant weight loss. This study compared individuals with CED to individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN), </span></span>bulimia nervosa (BN), or binge-eating disorder (BED) on measures of psychiatric impairment, eating-disorder (ED) </span>symptomatology, and comorbid internalizing disorders.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Adults (<em>N</em> = 187) with CED, AN, BN, or BED completed measures of ED-related-psychiatric impairment and ED symptomatology. Structured clinical interviews were administered to assess ED and internalizing-disorder diagnoses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Linear regression models were fit to compare the CED group to full-threshold ED groups on psychiatric impairment, body dissatisfaction, cognitive restraint, negative attitudes towards obesity, and weight suppression. A chi-square difference test examined group differences on internalizing-disorder prevalence. Results indicated that the CED group had high levels of psychiatric impairment, yet psychiatric impairment was significantly lower in the CED group compared to other groups. The AN group had significantly lower body dissatisfaction than the CED group. Individuals with CED had similar cognitive restraint, negative attitudes towards obesity, internalizing psychopathology, and weight suppression compared to other ED groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Individuals with CED had substantial ED psychopathology and internalizing-disorder prevalence, comparable to individuals with full-threshold EDs. Individuals with CED had high levels of psychiatric impairment, but their impairment was lower than individuals with full-threshold EDs. Our results indicate that CED is a clinically significant disorder.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147101532300123X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Compensatory eating disorder (CED) is a newly proposed ‘other specified feeding and eating disorder’ characterized by recurrent non-purging compensatory behaviors (e.g., compulsive exercise and/or food restriction), overvaluation of weight/shape, the absence of objective binge-eating episodes, and the absence of low weight or recent significant weight loss. This study compared individuals with CED to individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), or binge-eating disorder (BED) on measures of psychiatric impairment, eating-disorder (ED) symptomatology, and comorbid internalizing disorders.

Method

Adults (N = 187) with CED, AN, BN, or BED completed measures of ED-related-psychiatric impairment and ED symptomatology. Structured clinical interviews were administered to assess ED and internalizing-disorder diagnoses.

Results

Linear regression models were fit to compare the CED group to full-threshold ED groups on psychiatric impairment, body dissatisfaction, cognitive restraint, negative attitudes towards obesity, and weight suppression. A chi-square difference test examined group differences on internalizing-disorder prevalence. Results indicated that the CED group had high levels of psychiatric impairment, yet psychiatric impairment was significantly lower in the CED group compared to other groups. The AN group had significantly lower body dissatisfaction than the CED group. Individuals with CED had similar cognitive restraint, negative attitudes towards obesity, internalizing psychopathology, and weight suppression compared to other ED groups.

Conclusion

Individuals with CED had substantial ED psychopathology and internalizing-disorder prevalence, comparable to individuals with full-threshold EDs. Individuals with CED had high levels of psychiatric impairment, but their impairment was lower than individuals with full-threshold EDs. Our results indicate that CED is a clinically significant disorder.

代偿性进食障碍和全阈值DSM进食障碍:进食障碍相关精神障碍和症状学的比较
代偿性进食障碍(CED)是一种新提出的“其他特定的进食障碍”,其特征是反复出现的非清除性代偿行为(例如,强迫性运动和/或食物限制),对体重/形状的高估,缺乏客观的暴饮暴食发作,以及缺乏低体重或近期显著的体重减轻。本研究比较了CED患者与神经性厌食症(AN)、神经性贪食症(BN)或暴饮暴食症(BED)患者在精神损害、进食障碍(ED)症状学和共病内化障碍方面的测量结果。方法187例患有ED、AN、BN或BED的成年人完成了ED相关精神障碍和ED症状的测量。采用结构化的临床访谈来评估ED和内化障碍的诊断。结果CED组与全阈值ED组在精神障碍、身体不满意、认知约束、对肥胖的消极态度和体重抑制方面的线性回归模型比较均符合标准。卡方差异检验检验了内化障碍患病率的组间差异。结果表明,CED组有较高水平的精神障碍,但与其他组相比,CED组的精神障碍明显较低。AN组对身体的不满明显低于CED组。与其他ED组相比,CED患者有相似的认知限制、对肥胖的消极态度、内化精神病理和体重抑制。结论与全阈值ED患者相比,CED患者具有明显的ED精神病理和内化障碍患病率。ed患者的精神障碍水平较高,但低于全阈值ed患者。我们的结果表明,CED是一种具有临床意义的疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信