Widening Excess Mortality During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Individuals Who Self-Harmed.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Sze Chim Lee, Marcos DelPozo-Banos, Yasmin Friedmann, Ashley Akbari, Ronan A Lyons, Ann John
{"title":"Widening Excess Mortality During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Individuals Who Self-Harmed.","authors":"Sze Chim Lee, Marcos DelPozo-Banos, Yasmin Friedmann, Ashley Akbari, Ronan A Lyons, Ann John","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Studies on COVID-19 pandemic-associated changes in mortality following self-harm remain scarce and inconclusive. <i>Aims:</i> To compare mortality risks in individuals who had self-harmed to those for individuals who had not, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (Waves 1 and 2) in Wales, the United Kingdom, using population-based routinely collected data. <i>Method:</i> We linked whole population health data to all-cause mortality following an episode of self-harm between April 2016 and March 2021. Propensity score matching, Cox regression, and difference-in-differences were applied to compute changes in excess mortality (as ratios of hazard ratios, RHRs) before and during the pandemic for individuals who self-harmed. <i>Results:</i> The difference in mortality for individuals who self-harmed compared to those who did not widened during Wave 1 (RHR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.04-4.03) and Wave 2 (RHR = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.12-4.29) from before the pandemic. Stratification by sex and age group produced no significant subgroup differences although risk for younger than 65 years group were higher. <i>Limitations:</i> Limitations include small sample size and incomplete data on cause-specific deaths during the pandemic. <i>Conclusion:</i> Our results underscore continuous monitoring of mortality of individuals who self-harm and effective interventions to address any increases in mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"154-158"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10999850/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000882","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Studies on COVID-19 pandemic-associated changes in mortality following self-harm remain scarce and inconclusive. Aims: To compare mortality risks in individuals who had self-harmed to those for individuals who had not, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (Waves 1 and 2) in Wales, the United Kingdom, using population-based routinely collected data. Method: We linked whole population health data to all-cause mortality following an episode of self-harm between April 2016 and March 2021. Propensity score matching, Cox regression, and difference-in-differences were applied to compute changes in excess mortality (as ratios of hazard ratios, RHRs) before and during the pandemic for individuals who self-harmed. Results: The difference in mortality for individuals who self-harmed compared to those who did not widened during Wave 1 (RHR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.04-4.03) and Wave 2 (RHR = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.12-4.29) from before the pandemic. Stratification by sex and age group produced no significant subgroup differences although risk for younger than 65 years group were higher. Limitations: Limitations include small sample size and incomplete data on cause-specific deaths during the pandemic. Conclusion: Our results underscore continuous monitoring of mortality of individuals who self-harm and effective interventions to address any increases in mortality.

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,自我伤害者的超额死亡率不断扩大。
背景:有关 COVID-19 大流行导致自残后死亡率变化的研究仍然很少,也没有定论。目的:利用基于人口的常规收集数据,比较在英国威尔士 COVID-19 大流行(第 1 波和第 2 波)之前和期间,自残者与未自残者的死亡风险。方法:我们将整个人口健康数据与 2016 年 4 月至 2021 年 3 月期间发生自残事件后的全因死亡率联系起来。应用倾向得分匹配、Cox 回归和差分法计算大流行前和大流行期间自我伤害者的超额死亡率变化(危险比比率,RHRs)。结果显示与大流行前相比,在第一波(RHR = 2.03,95% CI:1.04-4.03)和第二波(RHR = 2.19,95% CI:1.12-4.29)期间,自我伤害者与非自我伤害者的死亡率差异有所扩大。虽然 65 岁以下人群的风险较高,但按性别和年龄组进行分层并无明显的亚组差异。局限性:局限性包括样本量较小以及大流行期间特定死因的数据不完整。结论:我们的研究结果强调要持续监测自我伤害者的死亡率,并采取有效的干预措施来应对死亡率的上升。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: A must for all who need to keep up on the latest findings from both basic research and practical experience in the fields of suicide prevention and crisis intervention! This well-established periodical’s reputation for publishing important articles on suicidology and crisis intervention from around the world is being further enhanced with the move to 6 issues per year (previously 4) in 2010. But over and above its scientific reputation, Crisis also publishes potentially life-saving information for all those involved in crisis intervention and suicide prevention, making it important reading for clinicians, counselors, hotlines, and crisis intervention centers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信