Espiritualmente resilientes. Relación entre espiritualidad y resiliencia en cuidados paliativos

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Tamara Redondo-Elvira , Celia Ibañez-del-Prado , Sara Barbas-Abad
{"title":"Espiritualmente resilientes. Relación entre espiritualidad y resiliencia en cuidados paliativos","authors":"Tamara Redondo-Elvira ,&nbsp;Celia Ibañez-del-Prado ,&nbsp;Sara Barbas-Abad","doi":"10.1016/j.clysa.2017.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper aims to analyse if there is a positive relationship between resilience and spirituality in its three dimensions (intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal) as shown in previous studies. At the same time, it explores if there is a relationship with sociodemographic variables.</p><p>A descriptive, correlational, cross-sectional study in hospitalised palliative patients was carried out. Resilience (BRCS) and Spirituality (GES) were used as variables. A sample of 105 hospitalised palliative patients was chosen, of which the average age was 65.88 and 53.3% were women. Oncologic diagnosis<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->86.7%, low cultural level<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->59%; single<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->56.2%, and average PPS<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->54.2. Concerninn the relationship between resilience and spirituality, GES total and GES intra was 57.7%, GES inter 36.3%, and GES trans 37.3% (Pearson's correlation). As a conclusion, there is a positive correlation between resilience and spirituality, as it was proved in previous studies. However, the intrapersonal dimension has the strongest relationship with resilience.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45730,"journal":{"name":"Clinica Y Salud","volume":"28 3","pages":"Pages 117-121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.clysa.2017.09.001","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica Y Salud","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S113052741730035X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This paper aims to analyse if there is a positive relationship between resilience and spirituality in its three dimensions (intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal) as shown in previous studies. At the same time, it explores if there is a relationship with sociodemographic variables.

A descriptive, correlational, cross-sectional study in hospitalised palliative patients was carried out. Resilience (BRCS) and Spirituality (GES) were used as variables. A sample of 105 hospitalised palliative patients was chosen, of which the average age was 65.88 and 53.3% were women. Oncologic diagnosis = 86.7%, low cultural level = 59%; single = 56.2%, and average PPS = 54.2. Concerninn the relationship between resilience and spirituality, GES total and GES intra was 57.7%, GES inter 36.3%, and GES trans 37.3% (Pearson's correlation). As a conclusion, there is a positive correlation between resilience and spirituality, as it was proved in previous studies. However, the intrapersonal dimension has the strongest relationship with resilience.

精神脆弱性。姑息治疗中灵性与弹性的关系
本文旨在分析以往研究中心理弹性与精神性之间是否存在内在、人际和超个人三个维度的正相关关系。同时,它还探讨了是否存在与社会人口变量的关系。对住院姑息治疗患者进行了描述性、相关性、横断面研究。弹性(BRCS)和灵性(GES)作为变量。选取住院姑息治疗患者105例,平均年龄65.88岁,女性53.3%。肿瘤诊断= 86.7%,低文化水平= 59%;单身= 56.2%,平均PPS = 54.2。在心理弹性与精神性的关系中,GES total和GES intra分别为57.7%、36.3%和37.3% (Pearson相关)。综上所述,正如之前的研究所证明的那样,弹性和灵性之间存在正相关关系。然而,个人层面与弹性的关系最为密切。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinica Y Salud
Clinica Y Salud PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
16
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信