Low level CO2 supplementation maintains isocapnia and reveals ventilatory long-term facilitation in rats

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Shawn Miller Jr , Edgar Juarez Lopez , Jessica M.L. Grittner , Brendan J. Dougherty
{"title":"Low level CO2 supplementation maintains isocapnia and reveals ventilatory long-term facilitation in rats","authors":"Shawn Miller Jr ,&nbsp;Edgar Juarez Lopez ,&nbsp;Jessica M.L. Grittner ,&nbsp;Brendan J. Dougherty","doi":"10.1016/j.resp.2023.104185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Acute, intermittent hypoxia (AIH) induces ventilatory long-term facilitation (vLTF) in awake, freely behaving rats under poikilocapnic and isocapnic experimental conditions. Establishing pre-clinical methods for vLTF induction that more closely align with successful protocols in humans and anesthetized rats would minimize dissonance in experimental findings and improve translational aspects of vLTF. Here, we tested several levels of low-dose CO<sub>2</sub> supplementation during and after AIH to determine 1) the lowest amount of inspired CO<sub>2</sub> that would maintain isocapnia in rats during a vLTF protocol, and 2) the net impact of supplemental CO<sub>2</sub> on vLTF expression. Rats received one of four levels of inspired CO<sub>2</sub> (0%, 0.5%, 1% or 2%) administered during AIH and for the 60 min following AIH to quantify vLTF. Our findings indicated that 2% inspired CO<sub>2</sub> was sufficient to maintain isocapnia across the AIH protocol and reveal significant vLTF. These findings provide evidence-based support for using 2% supplemental CO<sub>2</sub> during and after AIH when assessing vLTF in rats.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20961,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569904823001738/pdfft?md5=0f56e4a33e227a009bb3e20619e4e658&pid=1-s2.0-S1569904823001738-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569904823001738","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute, intermittent hypoxia (AIH) induces ventilatory long-term facilitation (vLTF) in awake, freely behaving rats under poikilocapnic and isocapnic experimental conditions. Establishing pre-clinical methods for vLTF induction that more closely align with successful protocols in humans and anesthetized rats would minimize dissonance in experimental findings and improve translational aspects of vLTF. Here, we tested several levels of low-dose CO2 supplementation during and after AIH to determine 1) the lowest amount of inspired CO2 that would maintain isocapnia in rats during a vLTF protocol, and 2) the net impact of supplemental CO2 on vLTF expression. Rats received one of four levels of inspired CO2 (0%, 0.5%, 1% or 2%) administered during AIH and for the 60 min following AIH to quantify vLTF. Our findings indicated that 2% inspired CO2 was sufficient to maintain isocapnia across the AIH protocol and reveal significant vLTF. These findings provide evidence-based support for using 2% supplemental CO2 during and after AIH when assessing vLTF in rats.

低水平的二氧化碳补充维持异氧血症,揭示大鼠的通气长期促进作用
急性,间歇性缺氧(AIH)诱导清醒,自由行为的大鼠在异负荷和等负荷实验条件下的通气长期促进(vLTF)。建立vLTF诱导的临床前方法,使其与人类和麻醉大鼠的成功方案更接近,将最大限度地减少实验结果的不一致,并改善vLTF的转化方面。在此,我们在AIH期间和之后测试了几种低剂量的二氧化碳补充水平,以确定1)在vLTF方案中维持大鼠异睡眠的最低吸入二氧化碳量,以及2)补充二氧化碳对vLTF表达的净影响。在AIH期间和AIH后60分钟内,大鼠接受四种水平(0%、0.5%、1%或2%)的吸入二氧化碳之一,以量化vLTF。我们的研究结果表明,2%的吸入二氧化碳足以在AIH方案中维持异氧血症,并显示显着的vLTF。这些发现为在AIH期间和之后评估大鼠vLTF时使用2%补充二氧化碳提供了循证支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology (RESPNB) publishes original articles and invited reviews concerning physiology and pathophysiology of respiration in its broadest sense. Although a special focus is on topics in neurobiology, high quality papers in respiratory molecular and cellular biology are also welcome, as are high-quality papers in traditional areas, such as: -Mechanics of breathing- Gas exchange and acid-base balance- Respiration at rest and exercise- Respiration in unusual conditions, like high or low pressure or changes of temperature, low ambient oxygen- Embryonic and adult respiration- Comparative respiratory physiology. Papers on clinical aspects, original methods, as well as theoretical papers are also considered as long as they foster the understanding of respiratory physiology and pathophysiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信