External finance for climate change mitigation: Assessing the impact of energy aid and total aid inflows on the ecological footprint

Muhammed Ashiq Villanthenkodath , Mohd Arshad Ansari , Mantu Kumar Mahalik , Hooi Hooi Lean
{"title":"External finance for climate change mitigation: Assessing the impact of energy aid and total aid inflows on the ecological footprint","authors":"Muhammed Ashiq Villanthenkodath ,&nbsp;Mohd Arshad Ansari ,&nbsp;Mantu Kumar Mahalik ,&nbsp;Hooi Hooi Lean","doi":"10.1016/j.jclimf.2023.100028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines the role of energy aid and total aid inflows in the ecological footprint of BRICS countries while controlling the economic growth, energy consumption, remittance inflows, and foreign direct investment inflows for the period spanning from 1992 to 2016. The empirical outcome of this work shows the long-run relationship for the selected variables. We find that overseas energy aid, total aid, and foreign direct investment inflows reduce ecological footprint while economic growth, remittance inflows, and energy consumption fuel it. These findings are robust across the alternative panel techniques used. However, the results imply that the energy aid, total aid, and investment capital coming from other countries and international agencies to BRICS countries are enhancing green energy plans rather than profiteering. This may be one of the reasons for the reduction of the ecological footprint in BRICS countries. Therefore, this study further suggests an effective climate mitigation policy for ensuring a life-sustaining green environment if the governments of BRICS countries can stimulate greater inflows of overseas energy aid, total aid, and foreign direct investment towards making the investment in green energy plans.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Climate Finance","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100028"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294972802300024X/pdfft?md5=627245f6f6f8168e5c048a485bd0002d&pid=1-s2.0-S294972802300024X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Climate Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294972802300024X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the role of energy aid and total aid inflows in the ecological footprint of BRICS countries while controlling the economic growth, energy consumption, remittance inflows, and foreign direct investment inflows for the period spanning from 1992 to 2016. The empirical outcome of this work shows the long-run relationship for the selected variables. We find that overseas energy aid, total aid, and foreign direct investment inflows reduce ecological footprint while economic growth, remittance inflows, and energy consumption fuel it. These findings are robust across the alternative panel techniques used. However, the results imply that the energy aid, total aid, and investment capital coming from other countries and international agencies to BRICS countries are enhancing green energy plans rather than profiteering. This may be one of the reasons for the reduction of the ecological footprint in BRICS countries. Therefore, this study further suggests an effective climate mitigation policy for ensuring a life-sustaining green environment if the governments of BRICS countries can stimulate greater inflows of overseas energy aid, total aid, and foreign direct investment towards making the investment in green energy plans.

缓解气候变化的外部资金:评估能源援助和援助总额流入对生态足迹的影响
本研究考察了1992年至2016年期间能源援助和援助总额流入对金砖国家生态足迹的影响,同时控制了经济增长、能源消费、汇款流入和外国直接投资流入。本工作的实证结果显示了所选变量的长期关系。研究发现,海外能源援助、总援助和外国直接投资流入减少了生态足迹,而经济增长、汇款流入和能源消费则加剧了生态足迹。这些发现在使用的替代面板技术中都是可靠的。然而,研究结果表明,来自其他国家和国际机构对金砖国家的能源援助、总援助和投资资本正在促进金砖国家的绿色能源计划,而不是暴利。这可能是金砖国家生态足迹减少的原因之一。因此,本研究进一步建议,如果金砖国家政府能够刺激更多的海外能源援助、总援助和外国直接投资流入绿色能源计划,那么就可以制定有效的气候减缓政策,以确保维持生命的绿色环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信