{"title":"Impact of transient shocks to productivity on long-term social discounting","authors":"Victor E. Gluzberg , Yuri A. Katz","doi":"10.1016/j.jclimf.2023.100027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The cost-benefit analysis of long-run climate mitigation projects and valuations of a social cost of carbon critically depend on the long-term social discount factor. Here, we consider the problem of the socially optimal risk-adjusted ‘Gamma discounting’ in the presence of strong exogeneous shocks to productivity of capital. We establish that the declining schedule of the long-term forward discount rates over time is very sensitive to the average frequency of shocks, <span><math><mi>λ</mi></math></span>, and the difference between the key model parameters: the intergenerational inequality aversion of a social planner <span><math><mi>η</mi></math></span> and the shape parameter <span><math><mi>a</mi></math></span> of the assumed Gamma distribution of productivity rates. We establish that for a relatively small intergenerational inequality aversion, <span><math><mrow><mi>η</mi><mo>≤</mo><mi>a</mi><mo>−</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></math></span>, the lowest possible forward discount rate is equal to <span><math><mi>λ</mi></math></span>. Qualitatively, this important conclusion can be explained by a higher sensitivity of the discount factor to technological breakthroughs bringing back high productivity rates (positive shocks) than to disasters (negative shocks). However, if <span><math><mrow><mi>η</mi><mo>></mo><mi>a</mi><mo>−</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>></mo><mn>0</mn></mrow></math></span>, the socially optimal forward discount rate can decline further down, towards zero, with a growth of the time horizon. Thus, socioeconomic projections of long-term discount rates require account of potential advances in technology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Climate Finance","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100027"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949728023000238/pdfft?md5=15c303e4df0dad9ba13594d976fb1b58&pid=1-s2.0-S2949728023000238-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Climate Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949728023000238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The cost-benefit analysis of long-run climate mitigation projects and valuations of a social cost of carbon critically depend on the long-term social discount factor. Here, we consider the problem of the socially optimal risk-adjusted ‘Gamma discounting’ in the presence of strong exogeneous shocks to productivity of capital. We establish that the declining schedule of the long-term forward discount rates over time is very sensitive to the average frequency of shocks, , and the difference between the key model parameters: the intergenerational inequality aversion of a social planner and the shape parameter of the assumed Gamma distribution of productivity rates. We establish that for a relatively small intergenerational inequality aversion, , the lowest possible forward discount rate is equal to . Qualitatively, this important conclusion can be explained by a higher sensitivity of the discount factor to technological breakthroughs bringing back high productivity rates (positive shocks) than to disasters (negative shocks). However, if , the socially optimal forward discount rate can decline further down, towards zero, with a growth of the time horizon. Thus, socioeconomic projections of long-term discount rates require account of potential advances in technology.