{"title":"Association of styloid process length with cervical carotid artery dissection: Meta-analysis","authors":"Loay H Abdelnour , Mohammed Kurdy , Abubakr Idris","doi":"10.1016/j.hsr.2023.100134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the association of elongated styloid process (Eagle syndrome) and cervical artery dissection (CeAD), particularly carotid. Medline, PubMed Central, CINAHL and ProQuest were searched for case-control studies investigating the association of styloid process length (SPL) and CeAD, particularly carotid. SPL was treated as a continuous variable and mean difference was calculated from means and standard deviations with 95 % confidence interval (CI). SPL >30 mm was compared between cases and controls as a dichotomous variable and odds ratio (OR) was calculated with 95 % CI. Heterogeneity was quantified with χ2-based Cochran's Q-test and I<sup>2</sup>-statistic. Four studies were included comparing 185 dissection cases with 278 controls. Heterogeneity was 50 %, but was reduced to 0 % with sensitivity analysis. Styloid process was significantly longer in dissection group with a mean difference of 2.50 [-0.35, 5.35], <em>P</em> = 0.09. Elimination of one study with high risk of bias resulted in a mean difference of 3.61 [1.47, 5.75], <em>P</em> = 0.0009, and a heterogeneity of 0 %. Two studies showed SPL >30 mm to be more significant in dissection group (OR = 1.53 [0.84,2.80], <em>P</em> = 0.17). With sensitivity analysis the pooled OR was 2.09 [1.04, 4.19], <em>P</em> = 0.04. Three studies showed that mean SPL was significantly longer ipsilateral compared to contralateral side of dissection (mean difference 2.63 [0.46, 4.79], <em>P</em> = 0.02. This meta-analysis suggests that CeAD is significantly associated with styloid process mean length and SPL >30 mm. Case-control studies with bigger numbers are required to substantiate this association.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73214,"journal":{"name":"Health sciences review (Oxford, England)","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772632023000600/pdfft?md5=a5552dd47a0e300b4fce7d21bdd8cddd&pid=1-s2.0-S2772632023000600-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health sciences review (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772632023000600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the association of elongated styloid process (Eagle syndrome) and cervical artery dissection (CeAD), particularly carotid. Medline, PubMed Central, CINAHL and ProQuest were searched for case-control studies investigating the association of styloid process length (SPL) and CeAD, particularly carotid. SPL was treated as a continuous variable and mean difference was calculated from means and standard deviations with 95 % confidence interval (CI). SPL >30 mm was compared between cases and controls as a dichotomous variable and odds ratio (OR) was calculated with 95 % CI. Heterogeneity was quantified with χ2-based Cochran's Q-test and I2-statistic. Four studies were included comparing 185 dissection cases with 278 controls. Heterogeneity was 50 %, but was reduced to 0 % with sensitivity analysis. Styloid process was significantly longer in dissection group with a mean difference of 2.50 [-0.35, 5.35], P = 0.09. Elimination of one study with high risk of bias resulted in a mean difference of 3.61 [1.47, 5.75], P = 0.0009, and a heterogeneity of 0 %. Two studies showed SPL >30 mm to be more significant in dissection group (OR = 1.53 [0.84,2.80], P = 0.17). With sensitivity analysis the pooled OR was 2.09 [1.04, 4.19], P = 0.04. Three studies showed that mean SPL was significantly longer ipsilateral compared to contralateral side of dissection (mean difference 2.63 [0.46, 4.79], P = 0.02. This meta-analysis suggests that CeAD is significantly associated with styloid process mean length and SPL >30 mm. Case-control studies with bigger numbers are required to substantiate this association.