D. Baumont , D. Amorèse , J. Benjumea , F. Ego , J.-P. Tardivel , P. Arroucau
{"title":"Reappraisal of the 1926, Jersey earthquake source parameters","authors":"D. Baumont , D. Amorèse , J. Benjumea , F. Ego , J.-P. Tardivel , P. Arroucau","doi":"10.1016/j.pepi.2023.107113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The Cotentin peninsula is a region located on the northeastern edge of the Armorican Massif (France) that hosts several nuclear and radioactive waste facilities. A recent publication raised some issues regarding the source parameters of the 1926, Jersey earthquake, one of the key reference earthquakes for assessing the </span>seismic hazard at the nuclear sites. In this study, we performed in-depth analyses on both the instrumental and macroseismic data to reappraise the source parameters. While the instrumental epicentral location was fairly well constrained at about mid-distance between the Jersey Island and the Cotentin peninsula, the focal depth could not be retrieved due to the resolution limits associated with a sparse seismological network and to the uncertainties on the phase picking. Different </span><em>M</em><sub>S</sub> formulations applicable for moderate magnitude events recorded at regional distances were implemented to better account for the epistemic uncertainties, resulting in an estimation of M<sub>S</sub> equal to 5.1 ± 0.3. Regarding the moment magnitude M<sub>W</sub><span>, we performed a broad series of waveform modeling accounting for a broad set of source parameterizations and signal processing techniques. The magnitude M</span><sub>W</sub> of the Jersey earthquake is estimated to 5.4 ± 0.3 although these evaluations are strongly influenced by the period range adopted to fit the observations. We also carried out the evaluation of both M<sub>S</sub> and M<sub>W</sub> magnitudes by modeling the macroseismic field with results (M<sub>S</sub> = 5.1 ± 0.3; Mw = 5.3 ± 0.3) that are consistent with the instrumental estimates. Regarding the focal depth, the macroseismic analyses shed light on this parameter, even though the results depend on the assumption made on the presumed epicentral intensity (∼18 km for I<sub>0</sub> = VI-VII and ∼ 12 km for I<sub>0</sub> = VII).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54614,"journal":{"name":"Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors","volume":"345 ","pages":"Article 107113"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031920123001395","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Cotentin peninsula is a region located on the northeastern edge of the Armorican Massif (France) that hosts several nuclear and radioactive waste facilities. A recent publication raised some issues regarding the source parameters of the 1926, Jersey earthquake, one of the key reference earthquakes for assessing the seismic hazard at the nuclear sites. In this study, we performed in-depth analyses on both the instrumental and macroseismic data to reappraise the source parameters. While the instrumental epicentral location was fairly well constrained at about mid-distance between the Jersey Island and the Cotentin peninsula, the focal depth could not be retrieved due to the resolution limits associated with a sparse seismological network and to the uncertainties on the phase picking. Different MS formulations applicable for moderate magnitude events recorded at regional distances were implemented to better account for the epistemic uncertainties, resulting in an estimation of MS equal to 5.1 ± 0.3. Regarding the moment magnitude MW, we performed a broad series of waveform modeling accounting for a broad set of source parameterizations and signal processing techniques. The magnitude MW of the Jersey earthquake is estimated to 5.4 ± 0.3 although these evaluations are strongly influenced by the period range adopted to fit the observations. We also carried out the evaluation of both MS and MW magnitudes by modeling the macroseismic field with results (MS = 5.1 ± 0.3; Mw = 5.3 ± 0.3) that are consistent with the instrumental estimates. Regarding the focal depth, the macroseismic analyses shed light on this parameter, even though the results depend on the assumption made on the presumed epicentral intensity (∼18 km for I0 = VI-VII and ∼ 12 km for I0 = VII).
期刊介绍:
Launched in 1968 to fill the need for an international journal in the field of planetary physics, geodesy and geophysics, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors has now grown to become important reading matter for all geophysicists. It is the only journal to be entirely devoted to the physical and chemical processes of planetary interiors.
Original research papers, review articles, short communications and book reviews are all published on a regular basis; and from time to time special issues of the journal are devoted to the publication of the proceedings of symposia and congresses which the editors feel will be of particular interest to the reader.