Exploring the link between thought-action fusion and symptom-based shame in obsessive-compulsive disorder

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Jana Hansmeier , Cornelia Exner , R. Porrmann , K. Schumacher , Jakob Fink-Lamotte
{"title":"Exploring the link between thought-action fusion and symptom-based shame in obsessive-compulsive disorder","authors":"Jana Hansmeier ,&nbsp;Cornelia Exner ,&nbsp;R. Porrmann ,&nbsp;K. Schumacher ,&nbsp;Jakob Fink-Lamotte","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2023.100848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The emotion of shame has been found to be closely related to obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Thought-action fusion (TAF) might explain this relationship, but its causal role with regard to symptom-based shame is unclear. There is growing evidence showing that the metacognitive intervention of detached mindfulness (DM) helps to prevent the development of TAF and thereby shame. The current study investigates, (1) if a TAF induction condition with violent content increases shame compared to a control induction condition with neutral content in randomized nonclinical participants with heightened OCD symptoms (<em>n</em> = 88), and (2) if a subsequent brief DM intervention shows a preventive effect for developing shame compared to a control condition about mnemonic techniques. An ANOVA showed that shame in participants of the TAF induction significantly increased compared to the control condition. In a second ANOVA, the DM intervention failed to show a preventive effect on developing TAF and shame in a following TAF induction experiment compared to the control condition. The present findings suggest the importance of TAF beliefs for the development of shame. A more intense DM intervention or additional (meta-)cognitive interventions might be necessary to prevent the development of shame.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100848"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364923000696","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The emotion of shame has been found to be closely related to obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Thought-action fusion (TAF) might explain this relationship, but its causal role with regard to symptom-based shame is unclear. There is growing evidence showing that the metacognitive intervention of detached mindfulness (DM) helps to prevent the development of TAF and thereby shame. The current study investigates, (1) if a TAF induction condition with violent content increases shame compared to a control induction condition with neutral content in randomized nonclinical participants with heightened OCD symptoms (n = 88), and (2) if a subsequent brief DM intervention shows a preventive effect for developing shame compared to a control condition about mnemonic techniques. An ANOVA showed that shame in participants of the TAF induction significantly increased compared to the control condition. In a second ANOVA, the DM intervention failed to show a preventive effect on developing TAF and shame in a following TAF induction experiment compared to the control condition. The present findings suggest the importance of TAF beliefs for the development of shame. A more intense DM intervention or additional (meta-)cognitive interventions might be necessary to prevent the development of shame.

探讨强迫症中思想-行动融合与基于症状的羞耻感之间的联系
羞耻情绪被发现与强迫症(OCD)密切相关。思想-行动融合(Thought-action fusion, TAF)或许可以解释这种关系,但它在基于症状的羞耻感方面的因果作用尚不清楚。越来越多的证据表明,超然正念(DM)的元认知干预有助于防止TAF的发展,从而防止羞耻。目前的研究调查了:(1)在随机的有强迫症症状的非临床参与者中,与中性内容的对照诱导条件相比,具有暴力内容的TAF诱导条件是否会增加羞耻感(n = 88);(2)与记忆技巧的对照条件相比,随后的短暂DM干预是否显示出对产生羞耻感的预防作用。方差分析显示,TAF诱导组的羞耻感明显高于对照组。在第二个方差分析中,与对照组相比,DM干预在随后的TAF诱导实验中未能显示出对TAF和羞耻感的预防作用。目前的研究结果表明,TAF信念对羞耻感的发展很重要。更强烈的糖尿病干预或额外的(元)认知干预可能是必要的,以防止羞耻的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
46
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders (JOCRD) is an international journal that publishes high quality research and clinically-oriented articles dealing with all aspects of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and related conditions (OC spectrum disorders; e.g., trichotillomania, hoarding, body dysmorphic disorder). The journal invites studies of clinical and non-clinical (i.e., student) samples of all age groups from the fields of psychiatry, psychology, neuroscience, and other medical and health sciences. The journal''s broad focus encompasses classification, assessment, psychological and psychiatric treatment, prevention, psychopathology, neurobiology and genetics. Clinical reports (descriptions of innovative treatment methods) and book reviews on all aspects of OCD-related disorders will be considered, as will theoretical and review articles that make valuable contributions. Suitable topics for manuscripts include: -The boundaries of OCD and relationships with OC spectrum disorders -Validation of assessments of obsessive-compulsive and related phenomena -OCD symptoms in diverse social and cultural contexts -Studies of neurobiological and genetic factors in OCD and related conditions -Experimental and descriptive psychopathology and epidemiological studies -Studies on relationships among cognitive and behavioral variables in OCD and related disorders -Interpersonal aspects of OCD and related disorders -Evaluation of psychological and psychiatric treatment and prevention programs, and predictors of outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信