Comparison of microleakage of root-end filling materials – In vitro study

International Journal of Dental Science and Research Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijdsr.2013.02.001

Ayush Razdan Singh , Arun Verma , K.K. Dixit

{"title":"Comparison of microleakage of root-end filling materials – In vitro study","authors":"Ayush Razdan Singh , Arun Verma , K.K. Dixit","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdsr.2013.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The objective of the study was to evaluate the microleakage of various root end filling materials and to find the sealing ability of these materials.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>Sixty (60) extracted single rooted anterior teeth<span><span> were selected and divided into four groups of 15 samples each. Group A, B, C and D in which root-end filling was done with Surgical Simplex Bone Cement, Super </span>EBA<span>, Ketac<span> Molar Glass Ionomer and Pro-root MTA<span> respectively. The teeth were retrofilled and then the apical halves were submerged in 2% methylene blue dye. The depth of dye penetration and maximum value of leakage in each sample were recorded.</span></span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Group D had statistically significant difference from Group C (1.73 ± 0.16 mm) as well as Group A (2.10 ± 0.14 mm).</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation and conclusion</h3><p>Microleakage of Group B was minimum. Thus concluding that Super EBA is a good root-end filling material.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100695,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dental Science and Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"Pages 6-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ijdsr.2013.02.001","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dental Science and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213997413000025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives

The objective of the study was to evaluate the microleakage of various root end filling materials and to find the sealing ability of these materials.

Methodology

Sixty (60) extracted single rooted anterior teeth were selected and divided into four groups of 15 samples each. Group A, B, C and D in which root-end filling was done with Surgical Simplex Bone Cement, Super EBA, Ketac Molar Glass Ionomer and Pro-root MTA respectively. The teeth were retrofilled and then the apical halves were submerged in 2% methylene blue dye. The depth of dye penetration and maximum value of leakage in each sample were recorded.

Results

Group D had statistically significant difference from Group C (1.73 ± 0.16 mm) as well as Group A (2.10 ± 0.14 mm).

Interpretation and conclusion

Microleakage of Group B was minimum. Thus concluding that Super EBA is a good root-end filling material.

查看原文本刊更多论文

根端充填材料微渗漏的比较——体外研究

目的评价不同根端充填材料的微渗漏情况，探讨不同根端充填材料的密封性能。方法选择60颗拔除的单根前牙，分为4组，每组15颗。A、B、C、D组分别使用Surgical Simplex Bone Cement、Super EBA、Ketac Molar Glass Ionomer和Pro-root MTA进行根端充填。补牙后用2%亚甲基蓝染料浸泡牙尖。记录每个样品的染料渗透深度和最大泄漏值。结果D组与C组(1.73±0.16 mm)、A组(2.10±0.14 mm)比较差异有统计学意义。结论B组微漏最小。因此，Super EBA是一种良好的根端充填材料。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Dental Science and Research

自引率

0.00%

发文量