International trade, development traps, and the core-periphery structure of income inequality

Dominik Hartmann , Mayra Bezerra , Beatrice Lodolo , Flávio L. Pinheiro
{"title":"International trade, development traps, and the core-periphery structure of income inequality","authors":"Dominik Hartmann ,&nbsp;Mayra Bezerra ,&nbsp;Beatrice Lodolo ,&nbsp;Flávio L. Pinheiro","doi":"10.1016/j.econ.2019.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Research on economic complexity has shown that a country’s type of exports conditions its future path of economic diversification and economic growth. Yet little emphasis has been put on the inequality associated with the types of products traded between countries and different regions of the world. Here we analyze the income inequality associated with the imports and exports of 116 countries in the period from 1970 to 2010. Our analysis shows that methods from network science and visual complexity research can help to reevaluate old theories in economics, such as core-periphery structures in international trade or structural development traps. Our results illustrate that the core-periphery structure of global trade affects not only the income inequality between countries, but also the income inequality within countries. Moreover, they reveal the structural constraints that developing and emerging economies face in promoting inclusive growth and benchmark their productive transformations with cases of successful catching up and developed economies. The results show that countries, such as South Korea or Germany, have benefited from outsourcing high inequality products. In contrast, some middle-income countries, such as Brazil or South Africa, face structural development constraints consisting of a large average distance of their export products to low inequality products and a “gravitational force” towards high inequality products. Finally, developing economies, such as Nicaragua or Sri Lanka face a double development trap for inclusive growth, as their economies depend on both a large share of high inequality exports and imports.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100389,"journal":{"name":"EconomiA","volume":"21 2","pages":"Pages 255-278"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.econ.2019.09.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EconomiA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1517758019300852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on economic complexity has shown that a country’s type of exports conditions its future path of economic diversification and economic growth. Yet little emphasis has been put on the inequality associated with the types of products traded between countries and different regions of the world. Here we analyze the income inequality associated with the imports and exports of 116 countries in the period from 1970 to 2010. Our analysis shows that methods from network science and visual complexity research can help to reevaluate old theories in economics, such as core-periphery structures in international trade or structural development traps. Our results illustrate that the core-periphery structure of global trade affects not only the income inequality between countries, but also the income inequality within countries. Moreover, they reveal the structural constraints that developing and emerging economies face in promoting inclusive growth and benchmark their productive transformations with cases of successful catching up and developed economies. The results show that countries, such as South Korea or Germany, have benefited from outsourcing high inequality products. In contrast, some middle-income countries, such as Brazil or South Africa, face structural development constraints consisting of a large average distance of their export products to low inequality products and a “gravitational force” towards high inequality products. Finally, developing economies, such as Nicaragua or Sri Lanka face a double development trap for inclusive growth, as their economies depend on both a large share of high inequality exports and imports.

国际贸易、发展陷阱与收入不平等的核心-边缘结构
对经济复杂性的研究表明,一国的出口类型决定了该国未来经济多样化和经济增长的路径。然而,很少有人强调与世界各国和不同地区之间贸易的产品类型有关的不平等。本文分析了1970年至2010年期间116个国家的进出口收入不平等。我们的分析表明,网络科学和视觉复杂性研究的方法有助于重新评估经济学中的旧理论,如国际贸易中的核心-外围结构或结构性发展陷阱。研究结果表明,全球贸易的核心-边缘结构不仅影响国家间的收入不平等,而且影响国家内部的收入不平等。此外,它们揭示了发展中经济体和新兴经济体在促进包容性增长方面面临的结构性制约,并将其生产转型与成功追赶的发达经济体的案例进行对比。结果显示,韩国或德国等国家从外包高不平等产品中获益。相比之下,一些中等收入国家,如巴西或南非,面临结构性发展限制,包括其出口产品与低不平等产品的平均距离较大,以及对高不平等产品的“引力”。最后,尼加拉瓜或斯里兰卡等发展中经济体面临包容性增长的双重发展陷阱,因为它们的经济既依赖很大一部分高度不平等的出口,也依赖很大一部分高度不平等的进口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信