The impact of a drug allergy label in an internal medicine ward.

IF 2.6 Q2 ALLERGY
P Simão Coelho, G Martins Dos Santos, M Mikovic, J Oliveira, S Rosa, E Silva, P Leiria Pinto
{"title":"The impact of a drug allergy label in an internal medicine ward.","authors":"P Simão Coelho, G Martins Dos Santos, M Mikovic, J Oliveira, S Rosa, E Silva, P Leiria Pinto","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong><b>Background.</b> Drug hypersensitivity reactions are presumably immune-mediated reactions that cause reproducible signs and/or symptoms. Overdiagnosis of drug allergy, frequently self-reported, is common and carries significant limitations. We intended to analyze the frequency and impact of drug allergy in hospitalized patients. <b>Methods.</b> A retrospective study was conducted in an Internal Medicine ward at a tertiary hospital in Portugal. All patients with a drug allergy report admitted within a 3-year period were included. Data were collected from their electronic medical records. <b>Results.</b> We found that 15.4% of patients had a report of drug allergy, with antibiotics being the most common (56.4%), followed by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (21.7%) and radiocontrast media (7.0%). The allergy report affected the clinical approach of 14.5% of patients by motivating the use of second-line agents, or the eviction of necessary procedures. The usage of alternative antibiotics entailed a cost increase of 2.4 times. There were 14.7% of patients to whom the suspected drug was administered: 87.0% tolerated and 13.0% developed a reaction. Only 1.9% were referred to our Allergy and Clinical Immunology department and proceeded in their allergy study. <b>Conclusions.</b> In this study, a considerable number of patients had a drug allergy label on their records. This label contributed to an increase in the cost of treatment, or the avoidance of necessary exams. However, disregarding an allergy record may lead to potentially life-threatening reactions that proper risk assessment could avoid. Further investigation should always be part of the follow-up routine of these patients, and better articulation between departments should be encouraged.</p>","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary: Background. Drug hypersensitivity reactions are presumably immune-mediated reactions that cause reproducible signs and/or symptoms. Overdiagnosis of drug allergy, frequently self-reported, is common and carries significant limitations. We intended to analyze the frequency and impact of drug allergy in hospitalized patients. Methods. A retrospective study was conducted in an Internal Medicine ward at a tertiary hospital in Portugal. All patients with a drug allergy report admitted within a 3-year period were included. Data were collected from their electronic medical records. Results. We found that 15.4% of patients had a report of drug allergy, with antibiotics being the most common (56.4%), followed by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (21.7%) and radiocontrast media (7.0%). The allergy report affected the clinical approach of 14.5% of patients by motivating the use of second-line agents, or the eviction of necessary procedures. The usage of alternative antibiotics entailed a cost increase of 2.4 times. There were 14.7% of patients to whom the suspected drug was administered: 87.0% tolerated and 13.0% developed a reaction. Only 1.9% were referred to our Allergy and Clinical Immunology department and proceeded in their allergy study. Conclusions. In this study, a considerable number of patients had a drug allergy label on their records. This label contributed to an increase in the cost of treatment, or the avoidance of necessary exams. However, disregarding an allergy record may lead to potentially life-threatening reactions that proper risk assessment could avoid. Further investigation should always be part of the follow-up routine of these patients, and better articulation between departments should be encouraged.

药物过敏标签对内科病房的影响。
摘要:背景。药物超敏反应可能是免疫介导的反应,可引起可重复的体征和/或症状。药物过敏的过度诊断(经常是自我报告)很常见,而且有很大的局限性。我们打算分析住院患者药物过敏的频率和影响。研究方法我们在葡萄牙一家三级医院的内科病房进行了一项回顾性研究。所有在 3 年内有药物过敏报告的住院患者均被纳入研究范围。研究人员从患者的电子病历中收集数据。研究结果我们发现,15.4% 的患者有药物过敏报告,其中最常见的是抗生素(56.4%),其次是非类固醇抗炎药(21.7%)和放射性造影剂(7.0%)。过敏报告影响了 14.5%患者的临床治疗方法,促使他们使用二线药物或放弃必要的治疗程序。使用替代抗生素导致费用增加了 2.4 倍。有 14.7% 的患者使用了疑似药物:87.0% 的患者能够耐受,13.0% 的患者出现了反应。只有 1.9% 的患者被转诊到过敏与临床免疫科,继续进行过敏研究。结论在这项研究中,相当多的患者的病历上都贴有药物过敏标签。该标签导致治疗费用增加或避免了必要的检查。然而,忽视过敏记录可能会导致潜在的危及生命的反应,而适当的风险评估可以避免这些反应。进一步的检查应始终成为这些患者的常规随访内容,并应鼓励各部门之间加强沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
102
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信