Employability skills, quality of life, and body composition on employment modalities in individuals with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Journal of Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-27 DOI:10.1177/17446295231168176
Carmen Gutiérrez-Cruz, Saray Muñoz-López, José Rubio-Cabeza, Pablo E Raya-Castellano, Andrés Roman-Espinaco
{"title":"Employability skills, quality of life, and body composition on employment modalities in individuals with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities.","authors":"Carmen Gutiérrez-Cruz, Saray Muñoz-López, José Rubio-Cabeza, Pablo E Raya-Castellano, Andrés Roman-Espinaco","doi":"10.1177/17446295231168176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The inclusion of individuals with intellectual disabilities into the labour market is a challenge in advanced societies, with only a very reduced percentage of these individuals being able to access the free labour market. Whilst some progress has recently been made, there is still a need to further explore the different conditioning factors. A total of 125 users belonging to the three employment modalities of Occupational Workshops (OW), Occupational Centers (OC) and Supported Employment (SE), participated in this study. Differences between modalities were determined for employability, quality of life, and body composition. Employability skills were higher for SE compared to OW and OC; the index of quality of life was higher for OC and SE groups compared to OW; no differences were found in body composition between groups. The quality-of-life index was higher for participants performing remunerated employment modalities and employment skills increased when work was more inclusive.</p>","PeriodicalId":46904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"1049-1062"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295231168176","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The inclusion of individuals with intellectual disabilities into the labour market is a challenge in advanced societies, with only a very reduced percentage of these individuals being able to access the free labour market. Whilst some progress has recently been made, there is still a need to further explore the different conditioning factors. A total of 125 users belonging to the three employment modalities of Occupational Workshops (OW), Occupational Centers (OC) and Supported Employment (SE), participated in this study. Differences between modalities were determined for employability, quality of life, and body composition. Employability skills were higher for SE compared to OW and OC; the index of quality of life was higher for OC and SE groups compared to OW; no differences were found in body composition between groups. The quality-of-life index was higher for participants performing remunerated employment modalities and employment skills increased when work was more inclusive.

轻、中度智力残疾个体的就业能力、技能、生活质量和身体构成对就业方式的影响。
在发达社会,将智障人士纳入劳动力市场是一项挑战,这些人中只有很少一部分人能够进入自由的劳动力市场。虽然最近取得了一些进展,但仍有必要进一步探索不同的条件因素。共有125名使用者参与本研究,他们分别来自职业工作坊、职业中心和支援就业三种就业模式。在就业能力、生活质量和身体组成方面确定了不同模式之间的差异。中小学生的就业能力技能高于普通学生和普通学生;OC组和SE组的生活质量指数高于OW组;各组之间的身体组成没有差异。从事有偿工作的参与者的生活质量指数更高,当工作更具包容性时,就业技能也会提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The principal aim of the journal is to provide a medium for the exchange of best practice, knowledge and research between academic and professional disciplines from education, social and health settings to bring about advancement of services for people with intellectual disabilities. The idea of a practice-led journal is both exciting and timely. This journal serves as a medium for all those involved with people with intellectual disabilities to submit and publish papers on issues relevant to promoting services for people with intellectual disabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书