Electric utility construction: Causes and types of field change orders

Q1 Social Sciences
Frank Bao Thai Nguyen , Neil Grigg , Rodolfo Valdes-Vasquez
{"title":"Electric utility construction: Causes and types of field change orders","authors":"Frank Bao Thai Nguyen ,&nbsp;Neil Grigg ,&nbsp;Rodolfo Valdes-Vasquez","doi":"10.1016/j.tej.2023.107332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The electric power industry provides most of the energy for global commerce, and controlling its construction costs is important to provide affordable energy. Controlling original contract costs and any added costs due to change orders requires effective planning and design of projects. While cost overruns due to change orders occur in other industries, the electric power utility industry faces technical complexity, poor understanding of field conditions, lack of jobsite visits, and poor collaboration among stakeholders during design and planning. Although published data exist for costs of change orders in other industries, almost none are available for the electric power sector. To mitigate these problems, project managers must understand these risks, provide better cost forecasts, and take other measures to avoid change orders. Using a descriptive statistical analysis of the project database of an electric utility company, this study addresses the data gap by analyzing the magnitude, frequency, and causes of field change orders of both overhead and underground electrical construction. The results identified nine causes of field change orders (FCOs) during construction. The percentage increases in the electrical construction contract costs appear to be higher than in other industries, which is an alarming finding considering the tendency to bury transmission lines due to fire hazards. The result showed that FCOs with added scopes occurred more frequently in underground projects than in overhead projects. The analysis indicated that most causes of field change orders could be managed during planning and design and through the construction phase. The findings of this study can be used by electric utilities when they convert from overhead to underground systems due to security and climate change factors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35642,"journal":{"name":"Electricity Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electricity Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040619023000994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The electric power industry provides most of the energy for global commerce, and controlling its construction costs is important to provide affordable energy. Controlling original contract costs and any added costs due to change orders requires effective planning and design of projects. While cost overruns due to change orders occur in other industries, the electric power utility industry faces technical complexity, poor understanding of field conditions, lack of jobsite visits, and poor collaboration among stakeholders during design and planning. Although published data exist for costs of change orders in other industries, almost none are available for the electric power sector. To mitigate these problems, project managers must understand these risks, provide better cost forecasts, and take other measures to avoid change orders. Using a descriptive statistical analysis of the project database of an electric utility company, this study addresses the data gap by analyzing the magnitude, frequency, and causes of field change orders of both overhead and underground electrical construction. The results identified nine causes of field change orders (FCOs) during construction. The percentage increases in the electrical construction contract costs appear to be higher than in other industries, which is an alarming finding considering the tendency to bury transmission lines due to fire hazards. The result showed that FCOs with added scopes occurred more frequently in underground projects than in overhead projects. The analysis indicated that most causes of field change orders could be managed during planning and design and through the construction phase. The findings of this study can be used by electric utilities when they convert from overhead to underground systems due to security and climate change factors.

电力设施建设:场次变更的原因和类型
电力工业为全球商业提供了大部分能源,控制其建设成本对于提供负担得起的能源非常重要。控制原始合同成本和任何因变更订单而增加的成本需要有效的项目规划和设计。由于变更订单导致的成本超支在其他行业也时有发生,但电力公用事业行业面临着技术复杂性、对现场条件了解不足、缺乏实地考察以及在设计和规划过程中利益相关者之间缺乏协作的问题。尽管其他行业也有变更订单成本的公开数据,但电力行业几乎没有相关数据。为了减轻这些问题,项目经理必须了解这些风险,提供更好的成本预测,并采取其他措施来避免变更订单。利用某电力公司项目数据库的描述性统计分析,通过分析架空和地下电力建设场次变化顺序的幅度、频率和原因,解决了数据缺口。结果确定了施工过程中现场变更顺序(FCOs)的9个原因。与其他行业相比,电力建设合同费的上涨率更高。考虑到因火灾隐患而导致的输电线路埋设趋势,这一结果令人担忧。结果表明,增加范围的fco在地下工程中发生的频率高于架空工程。分析表明,大多数现场变更顺序的原因可以在规划设计和整个施工阶段进行管理。这项研究的结果可以用于电力公司,当他们从架空转换到地下系统由于安全和气候变化的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Electricity Journal
Electricity Journal Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: The Electricity Journal is the leading journal in electric power policy. The journal deals primarily with fuel diversity and the energy mix needed for optimal energy market performance, and therefore covers the full spectrum of energy, from coal, nuclear, natural gas and oil, to renewable energy sources including hydro, solar, geothermal and wind power. Recently, the journal has been publishing in emerging areas including energy storage, microgrid strategies, dynamic pricing, cyber security, climate change, cap and trade, distributed generation, net metering, transmission and generation market dynamics. The Electricity Journal aims to bring together the most thoughtful and influential thinkers globally from across industry, practitioners, government, policymakers and academia. The Editorial Advisory Board is comprised of electric industry thought leaders who have served as regulators, consultants, litigators, and market advocates. Their collective experience helps ensure that the most relevant and thought-provoking issues are presented to our readers, and helps navigate the emerging shape and design of the electricity/energy industry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信