Power in environmental peacebuilding

Katy Davis , Laura E.R. Peters , Jamon Van Den Hoek , Ken Conca
{"title":"Power in environmental peacebuilding","authors":"Katy Davis ,&nbsp;Laura E.R. Peters ,&nbsp;Jamon Van Den Hoek ,&nbsp;Ken Conca","doi":"10.1016/j.wds.2023.100110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Environmental peacebuilding investigates mutually reinforcing relationships between environmental sustainability and peacebuilding. However, environmental peacebuilding research and practice frequently neglect to explicitly take account of power relations and inequities. This is despite other fields of research highlighting the centrality of power relations in the environment and in conflict. We reviewed the environmental peacebuilding literature for i) descriptions of contextual power dynamics and ii) explicit discussion of addressing power in environmental peacebuilding interventions. Just over half of included articles contained at least one of these, meaning that nearly half of articles did not discuss or engage with power or inequity in either the environmental/conflict context or the intervention process. Where articles did engage with power, there was a tendency to draw from narrow conceptualisations of power as control over others and over natural resources. We discuss these results in the context of broader debates around conceptualising power, and highlight the value of a relational approach to power for environmental peacebuilding. Finally, we propose a framework to recentre power in environmental peacebuilding interventions. We illustrate the ways that all interventions engage with power to some extent, regardless of whether they explicitly set out to do so. We argue that reaching the ‘virtuous cycle’ of mutually reinforcing positive peace and environmental sustainability requires active transformation of power relations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101285,"journal":{"name":"World Development Sustainability","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772655X23000654/pdfft?md5=129bb9e97ea308cac981e57e24d2082f&pid=1-s2.0-S2772655X23000654-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772655X23000654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental peacebuilding investigates mutually reinforcing relationships between environmental sustainability and peacebuilding. However, environmental peacebuilding research and practice frequently neglect to explicitly take account of power relations and inequities. This is despite other fields of research highlighting the centrality of power relations in the environment and in conflict. We reviewed the environmental peacebuilding literature for i) descriptions of contextual power dynamics and ii) explicit discussion of addressing power in environmental peacebuilding interventions. Just over half of included articles contained at least one of these, meaning that nearly half of articles did not discuss or engage with power or inequity in either the environmental/conflict context or the intervention process. Where articles did engage with power, there was a tendency to draw from narrow conceptualisations of power as control over others and over natural resources. We discuss these results in the context of broader debates around conceptualising power, and highlight the value of a relational approach to power for environmental peacebuilding. Finally, we propose a framework to recentre power in environmental peacebuilding interventions. We illustrate the ways that all interventions engage with power to some extent, regardless of whether they explicitly set out to do so. We argue that reaching the ‘virtuous cycle’ of mutually reinforcing positive peace and environmental sustainability requires active transformation of power relations.

环境和平建设中的力量
环境建设和平调查环境可持续性与建设和平之间相互加强的关系。然而,环境建设和平的研究和实践往往忽视明确考虑权力关系和不平等。尽管其他领域的研究强调了权力关系在环境和冲突中的中心地位。我们回顾了环境建设和平的文献i)上下文权力动力学的描述和ii)在环境建设和平干预措施中解决权力的明确讨论。超过一半的纳入文章至少包含其中一项,这意味着近一半的文章没有讨论或参与环境/冲突背景或干预过程中的权力或不平等。当文章确实涉及权力时,人们倾向于将权力狭隘地定义为对他人和自然资源的控制。我们在围绕权力概念化的更广泛辩论的背景下讨论这些结果,并强调关系权力方法对环境和平建设的价值。最后,我们提出了一个框架,以重新集中环境建设和平干预措施的权力。我们说明了所有干预措施在某种程度上与权力接触的方式,无论它们是否明确地这样做。我们认为,要达到积极和平与环境可持续性相互加强的“良性循环”,需要积极地转变权力关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信