Shusil Sigdel , Justin P. Wright , Jose Covarrubias , Archana Sekar , Kamalambika Mutthukumar , Stefan H. Bossmann , Jun Li , Arjun Nepal , Stephen Corkill , Christopher M. Sorensen
{"title":"Graphene nanosheets from the controlled explosion of aromatic hydrocarbons","authors":"Shusil Sigdel , Justin P. Wright , Jose Covarrubias , Archana Sekar , Kamalambika Mutthukumar , Stefan H. Bossmann , Jun Li , Arjun Nepal , Stephen Corkill , Christopher M. Sorensen","doi":"10.1016/j.cartre.2023.100306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Explosions of benzene, toluene and xylenes were carried out in a 16.7 L chamber in the presence of O<sub>2</sub> at different fuel-rich molar ratios such that an aerosol of elemental carbon was produced. The product was a powder at higher precursor oxygen content and an aerosol gel at lower oxygen where the carbon yield was larger. The explosion temperature was measured by a spectrometer that detected black body, Planck radiation from the incandescent carbon, the analysis of which indicated temperatures in the range 2000–2500 K. The product collected was characterized by Raman, X-ray diffraction, Brunauer, Emmett and Teller (BET) specific surface area, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), etc. HRTEM and Raman showed two product types: amorphous soot at a lower explosion temperature and few-layer graphene at a higher explosion temperature. BET showed that the graphene sample is highly porous and has a specific surface area of 388 m<sup>2</sup>/g. We conclude that chamber explosion of aromatic hydrocarbons can produce graphene, and the high explosion temperature during the reaction is the primary reason graphene is formed rather than soot.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52629,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Trends","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667056923000615/pdfft?md5=7dafe8832ce91d0cae94265ae46534ba&pid=1-s2.0-S2667056923000615-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667056923000615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Explosions of benzene, toluene and xylenes were carried out in a 16.7 L chamber in the presence of O2 at different fuel-rich molar ratios such that an aerosol of elemental carbon was produced. The product was a powder at higher precursor oxygen content and an aerosol gel at lower oxygen where the carbon yield was larger. The explosion temperature was measured by a spectrometer that detected black body, Planck radiation from the incandescent carbon, the analysis of which indicated temperatures in the range 2000–2500 K. The product collected was characterized by Raman, X-ray diffraction, Brunauer, Emmett and Teller (BET) specific surface area, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), etc. HRTEM and Raman showed two product types: amorphous soot at a lower explosion temperature and few-layer graphene at a higher explosion temperature. BET showed that the graphene sample is highly porous and has a specific surface area of 388 m2/g. We conclude that chamber explosion of aromatic hydrocarbons can produce graphene, and the high explosion temperature during the reaction is the primary reason graphene is formed rather than soot.