Prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia by a nose care program combining with oral care among patients hospitalized in intensive care units: a single-blind randomized controlled trial

Q4 Medicine
Afsaneh Halili, Somaieh Ghafari, Mahmood Saghaei, Vajihe Atashi
{"title":"Prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia by a nose care program combining with oral care among patients hospitalized in intensive care units: a single-blind randomized controlled trial","authors":"Afsaneh Halili,&nbsp;Somaieh Ghafari,&nbsp;Mahmood Saghaei,&nbsp;Vajihe Atashi","doi":"10.1016/j.mcpsp.2023.100401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common ICU-acquired infections. Preventing nasal canal colonization through an effective nasal cavity care, along with oral care seem to be an important issue.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted on 31 patients in each intervention and control group in Alzahra and Kashani hospitals, Iran. The interventional program was considered every 8 h for 5 days. It included cleaning the nasal cavities with cotton swabs soaked in sterile normal saline, then 2 puffs of 65% sodium chloride nasal spray were used for each nostril, and finally the nasal canal was moistened with a swab dipped in Veramin gel (0.5 ml into each nostril). For the control group, routine nasal care including cleaning the outer nostrils was offered. Oral care in 2 groups was performed according to the standard protocol. Data collected through demographic and clinical questionnaire as well as modified pulmonary infection clinical scale. The chi-square and independent tests were used to determine the homogeneity of basic characteristics. Also, we estimated and compared the incidence of VAP between 2 groups by chi-square test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The incidence of VAP was not statistically different in the intervention and control groups on the third day after intervention (29.1% vs. 32.3%, respectively, <em>P</em> = .915), while this rate on the sixth day was significantly lesser in the intervention than control (32.3 vs. 58%, <em>P</em> = .041).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The present nasal care program along with oral care is an effective strategy to prevent VAP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36921,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Clinica Practica","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 100401"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603924923000393/pdfft?md5=888e7be244f1ea4e4c7a9519d4b9a82f&pid=1-s2.0-S2603924923000393-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Clinica Practica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603924923000393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common ICU-acquired infections. Preventing nasal canal colonization through an effective nasal cavity care, along with oral care seem to be an important issue.

Methods

This single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted on 31 patients in each intervention and control group in Alzahra and Kashani hospitals, Iran. The interventional program was considered every 8 h for 5 days. It included cleaning the nasal cavities with cotton swabs soaked in sterile normal saline, then 2 puffs of 65% sodium chloride nasal spray were used for each nostril, and finally the nasal canal was moistened with a swab dipped in Veramin gel (0.5 ml into each nostril). For the control group, routine nasal care including cleaning the outer nostrils was offered. Oral care in 2 groups was performed according to the standard protocol. Data collected through demographic and clinical questionnaire as well as modified pulmonary infection clinical scale. The chi-square and independent tests were used to determine the homogeneity of basic characteristics. Also, we estimated and compared the incidence of VAP between 2 groups by chi-square test.

Results

The incidence of VAP was not statistically different in the intervention and control groups on the third day after intervention (29.1% vs. 32.3%, respectively, P = .915), while this rate on the sixth day was significantly lesser in the intervention than control (32.3 vs. 58%, P = .041).

Conclusion

The present nasal care program along with oral care is an effective strategy to prevent VAP.

在重症监护病房住院患者中,通过鼻子护理计划结合口腔护理预防呼吸机相关肺炎:一项单盲随机对照试验
目的呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)是icu获得性感染中最常见的一种。通过有效的鼻腔护理和口腔护理来预防鼻道定植似乎是一个重要的问题。方法选取伊朗Alzahra和Kashani医院的31例患者进行单盲随机对照试验,每组分为干预组和对照组。干预方案每8次 h考虑一次,持续5天。先用棉签浸泡无菌生理盐水清洁鼻腔,然后每个鼻孔使用2支65%氯化钠鼻喷雾剂,最后用棉签蘸Veramin凝胶(每个鼻孔0.5 ml)湿润鼻道。对照组给予常规鼻腔护理,包括清洁外鼻孔。两组患者均按标准方案进行口腔护理。通过人口统计学和临床问卷调查以及修改后的肺部感染临床量表收集数据。采用卡方检验和独立检验确定基本特征的均匀性。采用卡方检验估计并比较两组间VAP的发生率。结果干预组与对照组在干预后第3天VAP发生率无统计学差异(分别为29.1% vs. 32.3%, P = .915),而干预组在第6天VAP发生率显著低于对照组(32.3 vs. 58%, P = .041)。结论鼻护理结合口腔护理是预防VAP的有效策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicina Clinica Practica
Medicina Clinica Practica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
43 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信