Prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia by a nose care program combining with oral care among patients hospitalized in intensive care units: a single-blind randomized controlled trial
{"title":"Prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia by a nose care program combining with oral care among patients hospitalized in intensive care units: a single-blind randomized controlled trial","authors":"Afsaneh Halili, Somaieh Ghafari, Mahmood Saghaei, Vajihe Atashi","doi":"10.1016/j.mcpsp.2023.100401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common ICU-acquired infections. Preventing nasal canal colonization through an effective nasal cavity care, along with oral care seem to be an important issue.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted on 31 patients in each intervention and control group in Alzahra and Kashani hospitals, Iran. The interventional program was considered every 8 h for 5 days. It included cleaning the nasal cavities with cotton swabs soaked in sterile normal saline, then 2 puffs of 65% sodium chloride nasal spray were used for each nostril, and finally the nasal canal was moistened with a swab dipped in Veramin gel (0.5 ml into each nostril). For the control group, routine nasal care including cleaning the outer nostrils was offered. Oral care in 2 groups was performed according to the standard protocol. Data collected through demographic and clinical questionnaire as well as modified pulmonary infection clinical scale. The chi-square and independent tests were used to determine the homogeneity of basic characteristics. Also, we estimated and compared the incidence of VAP between 2 groups by chi-square test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The incidence of VAP was not statistically different in the intervention and control groups on the third day after intervention (29.1% vs. 32.3%, respectively, <em>P</em> = .915), while this rate on the sixth day was significantly lesser in the intervention than control (32.3 vs. 58%, <em>P</em> = .041).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The present nasal care program along with oral care is an effective strategy to prevent VAP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36921,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Clinica Practica","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 100401"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603924923000393/pdfft?md5=888e7be244f1ea4e4c7a9519d4b9a82f&pid=1-s2.0-S2603924923000393-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Clinica Practica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603924923000393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common ICU-acquired infections. Preventing nasal canal colonization through an effective nasal cavity care, along with oral care seem to be an important issue.
Methods
This single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted on 31 patients in each intervention and control group in Alzahra and Kashani hospitals, Iran. The interventional program was considered every 8 h for 5 days. It included cleaning the nasal cavities with cotton swabs soaked in sterile normal saline, then 2 puffs of 65% sodium chloride nasal spray were used for each nostril, and finally the nasal canal was moistened with a swab dipped in Veramin gel (0.5 ml into each nostril). For the control group, routine nasal care including cleaning the outer nostrils was offered. Oral care in 2 groups was performed according to the standard protocol. Data collected through demographic and clinical questionnaire as well as modified pulmonary infection clinical scale. The chi-square and independent tests were used to determine the homogeneity of basic characteristics. Also, we estimated and compared the incidence of VAP between 2 groups by chi-square test.
Results
The incidence of VAP was not statistically different in the intervention and control groups on the third day after intervention (29.1% vs. 32.3%, respectively, P = .915), while this rate on the sixth day was significantly lesser in the intervention than control (32.3 vs. 58%, P = .041).
Conclusion
The present nasal care program along with oral care is an effective strategy to prevent VAP.
目的呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)是icu获得性感染中最常见的一种。通过有效的鼻腔护理和口腔护理来预防鼻道定植似乎是一个重要的问题。方法选取伊朗Alzahra和Kashani医院的31例患者进行单盲随机对照试验,每组分为干预组和对照组。干预方案每8次 h考虑一次,持续5天。先用棉签浸泡无菌生理盐水清洁鼻腔,然后每个鼻孔使用2支65%氯化钠鼻喷雾剂,最后用棉签蘸Veramin凝胶(每个鼻孔0.5 ml)湿润鼻道。对照组给予常规鼻腔护理,包括清洁外鼻孔。两组患者均按标准方案进行口腔护理。通过人口统计学和临床问卷调查以及修改后的肺部感染临床量表收集数据。采用卡方检验和独立检验确定基本特征的均匀性。采用卡方检验估计并比较两组间VAP的发生率。结果干预组与对照组在干预后第3天VAP发生率无统计学差异(分别为29.1% vs. 32.3%, P = .915),而干预组在第6天VAP发生率显著低于对照组(32.3 vs. 58%, P = .041)。结论鼻护理结合口腔护理是预防VAP的有效策略。