Treatment of delirious mania with catatonia in a community teaching hospital: A case series

Tyler Wheeler, Sarayu Vasan
{"title":"Treatment of delirious mania with catatonia in a community teaching hospital: A case series","authors":"Tyler Wheeler,&nbsp;Sarayu Vasan","doi":"10.1016/j.psycr.2023.100190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Delirious mania (DM) is a serious and poorly understood neuropsychiatric syndrome with features of mania, delirium, catatonia, and psychosis. Although it was first described in the 1800s, there is no consensus on nosology or diagnostic criteria, exacerbating challenges in detection and treatment. DM is sometimes viewed as a subtype of mania, while others consider it to be a separate entity. There appears to also be a relationship between DM and catatonia, and DM has similarly been responsive to treatment with benzodiazepines and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). The literature surrounding DM is limited largely to case studies.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We present two cases of DM observed and treated in a community-based inpatient psychiatric unit to further add to the available literature on this challenging and severe neuropsychiatric syndrome.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Diagnosis of DM was complicated by lack of consensus diagnostic criteria; however, both patients displayed symptomatology consistent with the descriptions of DM put forward in the literature. Given the extensive differential diagnosis for DM, consideration was given to a variety of etiologies, including medical, neurological, and toxicological. Clinical severity throughout each patient's hospital course was assessed using Confusion Assessment Method Severity (CAM-S) and Clinical Global Impressions Severity (CGI-S) scales for each day of admission. Signs and symptoms consistent with delirium and catatonia were also displayed by each patient during their hospital course. In each case, the patients were treated with a combination of antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, and benzodiazepines. We posit that this is an effective treatment regimen in cases of DM with catatonia in which ECT is not accessible.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>DM is a serious and likely under-recognized clinical phenomenon. A combination of antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, and benzodiazepines may be an effective treatment regimen in DM cases with catatonia where administration of ECT is not possible. Development of a consensus diagnostic criteria is needed to expand research into the management of DM.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74594,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry research case reports","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773021223000883/pdfft?md5=199b226ea6d393ddbdf947970f3bea70&pid=1-s2.0-S2773021223000883-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry research case reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773021223000883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Delirious mania (DM) is a serious and poorly understood neuropsychiatric syndrome with features of mania, delirium, catatonia, and psychosis. Although it was first described in the 1800s, there is no consensus on nosology or diagnostic criteria, exacerbating challenges in detection and treatment. DM is sometimes viewed as a subtype of mania, while others consider it to be a separate entity. There appears to also be a relationship between DM and catatonia, and DM has similarly been responsive to treatment with benzodiazepines and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). The literature surrounding DM is limited largely to case studies.

Objective

We present two cases of DM observed and treated in a community-based inpatient psychiatric unit to further add to the available literature on this challenging and severe neuropsychiatric syndrome.

Discussion

Diagnosis of DM was complicated by lack of consensus diagnostic criteria; however, both patients displayed symptomatology consistent with the descriptions of DM put forward in the literature. Given the extensive differential diagnosis for DM, consideration was given to a variety of etiologies, including medical, neurological, and toxicological. Clinical severity throughout each patient's hospital course was assessed using Confusion Assessment Method Severity (CAM-S) and Clinical Global Impressions Severity (CGI-S) scales for each day of admission. Signs and symptoms consistent with delirium and catatonia were also displayed by each patient during their hospital course. In each case, the patients were treated with a combination of antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, and benzodiazepines. We posit that this is an effective treatment regimen in cases of DM with catatonia in which ECT is not accessible.

Conclusion

DM is a serious and likely under-recognized clinical phenomenon. A combination of antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, and benzodiazepines may be an effective treatment regimen in DM cases with catatonia where administration of ECT is not possible. Development of a consensus diagnostic criteria is needed to expand research into the management of DM.

社区教学医院谵妄性躁狂症合并紧张症的治疗:个案系列
背景:谵妄性躁狂(DM)是一种严重且知之甚少的神经精神综合征,具有躁狂、谵妄、紧张症和精神病的特征。虽然它在19世纪首次被描述,但在分类学或诊断标准上没有达成共识,加剧了检测和治疗方面的挑战。重度糖尿病有时被视为躁狂症的一种亚型,而其他人则认为它是一个独立的实体。糖尿病和紧张症之间似乎也有关系,糖尿病对苯二氮卓类药物和电休克治疗(ECT)也有类似的反应。关于糖尿病的文献主要局限于案例研究。目的:我们报告了两例在社区精神科住院治疗的糖尿病患者,以进一步增加对这一具有挑战性和严重的神经精神综合征的现有文献。由于缺乏一致的诊断标准,DM的诊断变得复杂;然而,两例患者的症状与文献中DM的描述一致。鉴于糖尿病的广泛鉴别诊断,考虑了多种病因,包括医学、神经学和毒理学。每个患者住院期间的临床严重程度在入院的每一天使用混淆评估方法严重程度(CAM-S)和临床总体印象严重程度(CGI-S)量表进行评估。每位患者在住院期间也表现出与谵妄和紧张症一致的体征和症状。在每个病例中,患者都接受了抗精神病药物、情绪稳定剂和苯二氮卓类药物的联合治疗。我们认为,这是一种有效的治疗方案,在糖尿病与紧张症的情况下,ECT是不可及的。结论糖尿病是一种严重且易被忽视的临床现象。抗精神病药物、情绪稳定剂和苯二氮卓类药物的联合治疗可能是糖尿病合并紧张症的有效治疗方案,在这种情况下不可能使用电痉挛疗法。需要制定一致的诊断标准,以扩大对糖尿病管理的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatry research case reports
Psychiatry research case reports Medicine and Dentistry (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信