Poulami Mukherjee , Krishnamoorthy Sathiyan , Tomer Zidki , Mallikarjuna N Nadagouda , Virender K Sharma
{"title":"Can ultraviolet-assisted advanced reduction processes effectively destroy per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in real water matrices?","authors":"Poulami Mukherjee , Krishnamoorthy Sathiyan , Tomer Zidki , Mallikarjuna N Nadagouda , Virender K Sharma","doi":"10.1016/j.coche.2023.100971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The societal concerns about the widespread occurrence of toxic per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in different compartments of the environment have been increasing. Many remediation techniques are being investigated to lower PFAS levels in the aquatic environment. Among these various methods, ultraviolet-assisted advanced reduction processes (UV-ARPs) that use highly reducing hydrated electrons (e<sub>aq</sub><sup>–</sup>) to convert PFAS into nonfluorinated small organics and fluoride (F<sup>–</sup>) ions have received significant attention in recent years. This mini-review provides a mechanistic understanding of the degradation of PFAS using UV coupled with reductants — sulfite and iodide (i.e. UV-sulfite and UV-iodide systems). The potential advantages and difficulties of scaling up UV-ARP technology for real-time PFAS degradation are discussed. Emphasis is laid on the effectivity of UV-ARP under anoxic conditions in water. Yet, in the presence of dissolved oxygen and dissolved organic matter (DOM), PFAS degradation efficacy decreases mainly due to the rapid reactions of O<sub>2</sub> with reductive species (e.g. hydrated electron (e<sub>aq</sub><sup>–</sup>) and atomic hydrogen (H<sup>•</sup>)) and UV absorption by DOM. This review aims to draw the researcher's attention to pretreatment to remove DOM and anoxic conditions needed to realize the effectiveness of UV-ARPs in degrading PFAS in complex environmental water samples.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":292,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100971"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211339823000758","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The societal concerns about the widespread occurrence of toxic per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in different compartments of the environment have been increasing. Many remediation techniques are being investigated to lower PFAS levels in the aquatic environment. Among these various methods, ultraviolet-assisted advanced reduction processes (UV-ARPs) that use highly reducing hydrated electrons (eaq–) to convert PFAS into nonfluorinated small organics and fluoride (F–) ions have received significant attention in recent years. This mini-review provides a mechanistic understanding of the degradation of PFAS using UV coupled with reductants — sulfite and iodide (i.e. UV-sulfite and UV-iodide systems). The potential advantages and difficulties of scaling up UV-ARP technology for real-time PFAS degradation are discussed. Emphasis is laid on the effectivity of UV-ARP under anoxic conditions in water. Yet, in the presence of dissolved oxygen and dissolved organic matter (DOM), PFAS degradation efficacy decreases mainly due to the rapid reactions of O2 with reductive species (e.g. hydrated electron (eaq–) and atomic hydrogen (H•)) and UV absorption by DOM. This review aims to draw the researcher's attention to pretreatment to remove DOM and anoxic conditions needed to realize the effectiveness of UV-ARPs in degrading PFAS in complex environmental water samples.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering is devoted to bringing forth short and focused review articles written by experts on current advances in different areas of chemical engineering. Only invited review articles will be published.
The goals of each review article in Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering are:
1. To acquaint the reader/researcher with the most important recent papers in the given topic.
2. To provide the reader with the views/opinions of the expert in each topic.
The reviews are short (about 2500 words or 5-10 printed pages with figures) and serve as an invaluable source of information for researchers, teachers, professionals and students. The reviews also aim to stimulate exchange of ideas among experts.
Themed sections:
Each review will focus on particular aspects of one of the following themed sections of chemical engineering:
1. Nanotechnology
2. Energy and environmental engineering
3. Biotechnology and bioprocess engineering
4. Biological engineering (covering tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, drug delivery)
5. Separation engineering (covering membrane technologies, adsorbents, desalination, distillation etc.)
6. Materials engineering (covering biomaterials, inorganic especially ceramic materials, nanostructured materials).
7. Process systems engineering
8. Reaction engineering and catalysis.