Heterogeneous model to evaluate CFD in intracranial bifurcation aneurysms treated with the WEB device to predict angiographic outcome.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Interventional Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-03 DOI:10.1177/15910199231152514
Daniel Mantilla, Alain Berod, Andrés F Ortiz, Daniela D Vera, Franck Nicoud, Vincent Costalat
{"title":"Heterogeneous model to evaluate CFD in intracranial bifurcation aneurysms treated with the WEB device to predict angiographic outcome.","authors":"Daniel Mantilla, Alain Berod, Andrés F Ortiz, Daniela D Vera, Franck Nicoud, Vincent Costalat","doi":"10.1177/15910199231152514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionThe Woven EndoBridge device (WEB) was developed as an alternative to treat Wide-Necked bifurcation aneurysms. It has proven to be effective and safe, however, cases of recanalization have been reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and quantify hemodynamic parameters and indexes with CFD of the intracranial aneurysms before and after WEB simulation and to establish their relationship to complete occlusion.Materials and methodsUsing the heterogeneous model based on the marching cubes algorithm, we created 3D representations of 27 bifurcated intracranial aneurysms treated with the single-layer WEB device to evaluate hemodynamics parameters with CFD, calculated with and without the WEB.ResultsWe observed a lower treatment entry concentration indices (ICI) (2.12 ± 1.31 versus 3.14 ± 0.93, p-value: 0.029) previous to placement of WEB and higher pre-treatment FN (7.56 ± 5.92 versus 3.35 ± 1.51, p-value: 0.018) and post-treatment FN (5.34 ± 5.89 versus 1.99 ± 0.83, p-value: 0.021) for cases with successful occlusions. Lower post-treatment SRa (197.81 ± 221.29 versus 80.02 ± 45.25, p-value: 0.044) and higher pre (0.11 ± 0.07 versus 0.25 ± 0.19, p-value: 0.011) and post-treatment MATT (0.69 ± 1.23 versus 1.02 ± 0.46, p-value: 0.006) were observed in non-occluded cases.ConclusionsIn our CFD analysis of the hemodynamic parameters of IA, we found lower ICI before the placement of the WEB device and higher FN pre- and post-treatment for cases with successful occlusions. Non-occluded cases had lower post-treatment SRa and higher pre-treatment and post-treatment MATT.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"315-323"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12202945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199231152514","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionThe Woven EndoBridge device (WEB) was developed as an alternative to treat Wide-Necked bifurcation aneurysms. It has proven to be effective and safe, however, cases of recanalization have been reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and quantify hemodynamic parameters and indexes with CFD of the intracranial aneurysms before and after WEB simulation and to establish their relationship to complete occlusion.Materials and methodsUsing the heterogeneous model based on the marching cubes algorithm, we created 3D representations of 27 bifurcated intracranial aneurysms treated with the single-layer WEB device to evaluate hemodynamics parameters with CFD, calculated with and without the WEB.ResultsWe observed a lower treatment entry concentration indices (ICI) (2.12 ± 1.31 versus 3.14 ± 0.93, p-value: 0.029) previous to placement of WEB and higher pre-treatment FN (7.56 ± 5.92 versus 3.35 ± 1.51, p-value: 0.018) and post-treatment FN (5.34 ± 5.89 versus 1.99 ± 0.83, p-value: 0.021) for cases with successful occlusions. Lower post-treatment SRa (197.81 ± 221.29 versus 80.02 ± 45.25, p-value: 0.044) and higher pre (0.11 ± 0.07 versus 0.25 ± 0.19, p-value: 0.011) and post-treatment MATT (0.69 ± 1.23 versus 1.02 ± 0.46, p-value: 0.006) were observed in non-occluded cases.ConclusionsIn our CFD analysis of the hemodynamic parameters of IA, we found lower ICI before the placement of the WEB device and higher FN pre- and post-treatment for cases with successful occlusions. Non-occluded cases had lower post-treatment SRa and higher pre-treatment and post-treatment MATT.

使用异质模型评估使用 WEB 设备治疗的颅内分叉动脉瘤的 CFD,以预测血管造影结果。
简介:Woven EndoBridge 装置(WEB)是作为治疗宽颈分叉动脉瘤的替代方案而开发的。该装置已被证明是有效和安全的,但也有再狭窄病例的报道。本研究的目的是利用 CFD 评估和量化 WEB 模拟前后颅内动脉瘤的血流动力学参数和指标,并确定它们与完全闭塞的关系:使用基于行进立方体算法的异质模型,我们创建了27个使用单层WEB装置治疗的分叉颅内动脉瘤的三维模型,通过CFD评估使用和未使用WEB时的血液动力学参数:我们观察到,在放置 WEB 之前,治疗入口浓度指数(ICI)较低(2.12 ± 1.31 对 3.14 ± 0.93,P 值:0.029),而在成功闭塞的病例中,治疗前 FN(7.56 ± 5.92 对 3.35 ± 1.51,P 值:0.018)和治疗后 FN(5.34 ± 5.89 对 1.99 ± 0.83,P 值:0.021)较高。在未闭塞病例中观察到较低的治疗后 SRa(197.81 ± 221.29 对 80.02 ± 45.25,p 值:0.044)和较高的治疗前(0.11 ± 0.07 对 0.25 ± 0.19,p 值:0.011)和治疗后 MATT(0.69 ± 1.23 对 1.02 ± 0.46,p 值:0.006):在对 IA 血液动力学参数的 CFD 分析中,我们发现在成功闭塞的病例中,放置 WEB 装置前的 ICI 较低,治疗前后的 FN 较高。非闭塞病例治疗后 SRa 较低,治疗前和治疗后 MATT 较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信