A Comparative Study of the Etiology of Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissection and Carotid Artery Dissection.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Xingwen Zhang, Jintao Han, Jun Wang, Shengyuan Yu
{"title":"A Comparative Study of the Etiology of Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissection and Carotid Artery Dissection.","authors":"Xingwen Zhang,&nbsp;Jintao Han,&nbsp;Jun Wang,&nbsp;Shengyuan Yu","doi":"10.1097/NRL.0000000000000484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both extrinsic (trauma or violent movement) and intrinsic (structural abnormality, atherosclerosis, or hemodynamic instability) factors may result in arterial dissection. The role of these factors in the origin or progression of dissection remains unclear. This study aimed to characterize the clinical features, radiologic features, and outcomes of intracranial vertebral artery dissection compared with carotid artery dissection and to determine the major causative factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients with craniocervical dissection (n=127) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with intracranial vertebral artery dissection (n=77) and those with carotid artery dissection (n=35) were compared with respect to patient age, sex, cerebrovascular risk factors, laboratory indices, and radiologic features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intracranial vertebral artery dissection was the most common craniocervical arterial dissection in our cohort (n=77, 60.6%). Body mass index in the intracranial vertebral artery dissection group was significantly greater than that in carotid artery dissection group. Clinical manifestations of intracranial vertebral artery dissection included ischemic stroke (37.7%), dizziness or vertigo (39.0%), and headache or neck pain (44.2%). Two patients had a definite history of trauma. The frontal and lateral tortuosity ratios of the vertebral basilar artery were significantly greater while the vertex angle was smaller in the intracranial vertebral artery dissection group compared with carotid artery dissection group. A positive correlation between the tortuosity ratios and subarachnoid hemorrhage and a significant inverse correlation between the tortuosity ratios and lipid parameters (high-density lipoprotein; apolipoprotein A1) were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intrinsic causes may play a more important role in the development of intracranial vertebral artery dissection than carotid artery dissection.</p>","PeriodicalId":49758,"journal":{"name":"Neurologist","volume":" ","pages":"281-286"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bd/7b/nrl-28-281.PMC10521784.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NRL.0000000000000484","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Both extrinsic (trauma or violent movement) and intrinsic (structural abnormality, atherosclerosis, or hemodynamic instability) factors may result in arterial dissection. The role of these factors in the origin or progression of dissection remains unclear. This study aimed to characterize the clinical features, radiologic features, and outcomes of intracranial vertebral artery dissection compared with carotid artery dissection and to determine the major causative factors.

Methods: Consecutive patients with craniocervical dissection (n=127) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with intracranial vertebral artery dissection (n=77) and those with carotid artery dissection (n=35) were compared with respect to patient age, sex, cerebrovascular risk factors, laboratory indices, and radiologic features.

Results: Intracranial vertebral artery dissection was the most common craniocervical arterial dissection in our cohort (n=77, 60.6%). Body mass index in the intracranial vertebral artery dissection group was significantly greater than that in carotid artery dissection group. Clinical manifestations of intracranial vertebral artery dissection included ischemic stroke (37.7%), dizziness or vertigo (39.0%), and headache or neck pain (44.2%). Two patients had a definite history of trauma. The frontal and lateral tortuosity ratios of the vertebral basilar artery were significantly greater while the vertex angle was smaller in the intracranial vertebral artery dissection group compared with carotid artery dissection group. A positive correlation between the tortuosity ratios and subarachnoid hemorrhage and a significant inverse correlation between the tortuosity ratios and lipid parameters (high-density lipoprotein; apolipoprotein A1) were identified.

Conclusions: Intrinsic causes may play a more important role in the development of intracranial vertebral artery dissection than carotid artery dissection.

Abstract Image

颅内椎动脉夹层与颈动脉夹层病因的比较研究。
背景:外在因素(创伤或剧烈运动)和内在因素(结构异常、动脉粥样硬化或血液动力学不稳定)都可能导致动脉夹层。这些因素在夹层起源或进展中的作用尚不清楚。本研究旨在描述颅内椎动脉夹层与颈动脉夹层的临床特征、放射学特征和结果,并确定主要病因。方法:对127例连续行颅颈清扫术的患者进行回顾性分析。比较颅内椎动脉夹层患者(n=77)和颈动脉夹层患者的年龄、性别、脑血管危险因素、实验室指标和放射学特征。结果:在我们的队列中,颅内椎动脉夹层是最常见的颅颈动脉夹层(n=77,60.6%)。颅内椎动脉夹层的临床表现包括缺血性中风(37.7%)、头晕或眩晕(39.0%)、头痛或颈部疼痛(44.2%)。两名患者有明确的创伤史。与颈动脉夹层组相比,颅内椎动脉夹层组的椎-基底动脉的额侧弯曲率明显更大,而顶角更小。曲折率与蛛网膜下腔出血呈正相关,曲折率与脂质参数(高密度脂蛋白;载脂蛋白A1)呈显著负相关。结论:与颈动脉夹层相比,颅内椎动脉夹层的内在原因可能在其发展过程中发挥更重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurologist
Neurologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Neurologist publishes articles on topics of current interest to physicians treating patients with neurological diseases. The core of the journal is review articles focusing on clinically relevant issues. The journal also publishes case reports or case series which review the literature and put observations in perspective, as well as letters to the editor. Special features include the popular "10 Most Commonly Asked Questions" and the "Patient and Family Fact Sheet," a handy tear-out page that can be copied to hand out to patients and their caregivers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信