Organic Farming Systems Research Conference: Exploring Agronomic, Economic, Ecological, and Social Dimensions—Introduction to the Proceedings

Kathleen Merrigan
{"title":"Organic Farming Systems Research Conference: Exploring Agronomic, Economic, Ecological, and Social Dimensions—Introduction to the Proceedings","authors":"Kathleen Merrigan","doi":"10.1094/CM-2013-0429-01-PS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Organic food sales have tripled in the United States over the last decade, and industry analysts project that this fast-paced retail growth will continue into the next decade. At the direction of Congress, USDA played a key role in market development by establishing national organic standards and enforcing them. USDA's Strategic Plan recognizes the important potential of the organic economy and envisions 25 percent growth in US organic businesses from 2009-2015. We are building technical assistance, conservation programs and other measures to assist organic producers. Research on organic farming systems will also play a crucial role in supporting the growth needed for organic production to meet the fast-growing demand.</p><p>On March 16-18, 2011, USDA held a major conference in Washington, DC, to examine findings from research on organic farming systems, including many longstanding projects. Researchers from over a dozen universities and other research institutions presented empirical findings on the agronomic, economic, ecological, and quality-of-life performance of organic farming systems. Researchers from both within and outside of USDA presented findings on organic farming systems.</p><p>The papers in these proceedings are organized into the main topics represented at the conference—research findings from long-term experiments, research findings from producer surveys, and organic research activities in USDA. Three keynote presentations are also included in the proceedings. Reganold's opening keynote presentation tackles the issue of how we measure and compare the impacts of alternative farming systems. He examines the use of particular metrics and integrative research approaches, and notes the expanding set of parameters being used as well as the expanding set of opportunities for organic systems research.</p><p>The first group of papers examines the agronomic, economic, and ecological findings from long-term organic cropping systems experiments in different parts of the US—Iowa, Minnesota, Maryland, and Pennsylvania. All four papers present evidence that organic corn and soybean yields can be competitive with conventional systems, and can out-compete conventional systems in terms of profitability. Delate's results from the Iowa State University's Long-Term Agroecological (LTAR) experiment also show higher levels of soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, and extractable potassium and calcium in the organic systems. Coulter also finds higher levels of particulate organic matter and potentially mineralizable carbon in the organic systems in the University of Minnesota's Variable Input Crop Management Systems trial.</p><p>Cavigelli's perspective piece examines the USDA's Beltsville Farming Systems Project in Maryland, which was established in 1996. This trial has three organic grain cropping systems that differ in crop rotation length and complexity. Research findings show that increasing cropping system diversity improves the agronomic, economic, and environmental performance of organic systems. In his perspective piece, Moyer examines research findings from Rodale Institute's Farming System Trial, which has compared organic and conventional systems since 1981. Moyer argues that it is time to embrace new, economically-viable organic production strategies to improve the health of the soil, use less energy, release less greenhouse gas into the atmosphere, and help mitigate the impacts of a changing climate on crop production.</p><p>In the second group of papers, economists compare organic and conventional systems based on data from a nationwide USDA survey of producers. In 2005, USDA started including targeted samples of organic producers in its major annual economic survey. McBride used data from the USDA survey of soybean producers in 2006, and found that total economic costs for producing organic soybeans were higher and yields were lower—partly due to the predominance of food-use varieties in organic production—but price premiums made organic production more profitable in 2006. Taylor compared two methods of estimating the production costs of organic and conventional apple producers in the US using data from the USDA's 2007 survey. She concluded that in Washington State, where both conventional and organic apple production is concentrated, production costs are not much higher for organic producers than for conventional producers.</p><p>The third group of papers discusses the organic research and outreach activities underway in USDA's research, education and economics agencies. In her introduction, USDA Chief Scientist Woteki notes that organic systems offer significant potential for helping to address the agricultural challenges of our time. This section offers a window into some ways that USDA science programs are exploring that potential.</p><p>According to Smith, organic research is currently taking place in approximately 20 percent of USDA's Agricultural Research Service (ARS) research locations across the United States. Smith notes that many of the results from ARS organic research can be applied to conventional systems and vice versa. Research from USDA's Economic Research Service (ERS) shows that growth in the organic sector has been driven by consumer demand and Greene indicates that ERS has expanded its portfolio to include research on organic supply chains and consumer characteristics. USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service conducted the first-ever nationwide survey of organic producers in 2008, according to Buysse, and is collaborating with ERS to include organic samples in USDA's annual economic survey. O'Reilly describes the major programs that USDA's National Food and Agriculture Institute uses to fund extramural organic research, and indicates that these programs have expanded substantially in recent years.</p><p>The last set of papers examines organic agriculture and sustainability. In the first paper, Constance examines some of the social dimensions of organic agriculture. According to Constance, organic food production began as a social movement in the US many decades ago, but the tenor has changed substantially in recent years with the entry of large firms. In the final paper in the Proceedings—the closing keynote presentation at the conference—Scialaba widens our focus to examine organic agriculture's contribution to sustainability from an international perspective. She discusses a number of studies that examine the positive impacts of organic agriculture on soil fertility, energy use, and greenhouse gas emissions. Scialabba also notes the contribution of organic agriculture to social well-being and intergenerational equity through avoided harm and healthy community development.</p><p>Most of the conference sessions were streamed live by eOrganic—an online extension service supported by USDA—and are archived at www.extension.org.</p>","PeriodicalId":100342,"journal":{"name":"Crop Management","volume":"12 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1094/CM-2013-0429-01-PS","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1094/CM-2013-0429-01-PS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organic food sales have tripled in the United States over the last decade, and industry analysts project that this fast-paced retail growth will continue into the next decade. At the direction of Congress, USDA played a key role in market development by establishing national organic standards and enforcing them. USDA's Strategic Plan recognizes the important potential of the organic economy and envisions 25 percent growth in US organic businesses from 2009-2015. We are building technical assistance, conservation programs and other measures to assist organic producers. Research on organic farming systems will also play a crucial role in supporting the growth needed for organic production to meet the fast-growing demand.

On March 16-18, 2011, USDA held a major conference in Washington, DC, to examine findings from research on organic farming systems, including many longstanding projects. Researchers from over a dozen universities and other research institutions presented empirical findings on the agronomic, economic, ecological, and quality-of-life performance of organic farming systems. Researchers from both within and outside of USDA presented findings on organic farming systems.

The papers in these proceedings are organized into the main topics represented at the conference—research findings from long-term experiments, research findings from producer surveys, and organic research activities in USDA. Three keynote presentations are also included in the proceedings. Reganold's opening keynote presentation tackles the issue of how we measure and compare the impacts of alternative farming systems. He examines the use of particular metrics and integrative research approaches, and notes the expanding set of parameters being used as well as the expanding set of opportunities for organic systems research.

The first group of papers examines the agronomic, economic, and ecological findings from long-term organic cropping systems experiments in different parts of the US—Iowa, Minnesota, Maryland, and Pennsylvania. All four papers present evidence that organic corn and soybean yields can be competitive with conventional systems, and can out-compete conventional systems in terms of profitability. Delate's results from the Iowa State University's Long-Term Agroecological (LTAR) experiment also show higher levels of soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, and extractable potassium and calcium in the organic systems. Coulter also finds higher levels of particulate organic matter and potentially mineralizable carbon in the organic systems in the University of Minnesota's Variable Input Crop Management Systems trial.

Cavigelli's perspective piece examines the USDA's Beltsville Farming Systems Project in Maryland, which was established in 1996. This trial has three organic grain cropping systems that differ in crop rotation length and complexity. Research findings show that increasing cropping system diversity improves the agronomic, economic, and environmental performance of organic systems. In his perspective piece, Moyer examines research findings from Rodale Institute's Farming System Trial, which has compared organic and conventional systems since 1981. Moyer argues that it is time to embrace new, economically-viable organic production strategies to improve the health of the soil, use less energy, release less greenhouse gas into the atmosphere, and help mitigate the impacts of a changing climate on crop production.

In the second group of papers, economists compare organic and conventional systems based on data from a nationwide USDA survey of producers. In 2005, USDA started including targeted samples of organic producers in its major annual economic survey. McBride used data from the USDA survey of soybean producers in 2006, and found that total economic costs for producing organic soybeans were higher and yields were lower—partly due to the predominance of food-use varieties in organic production—but price premiums made organic production more profitable in 2006. Taylor compared two methods of estimating the production costs of organic and conventional apple producers in the US using data from the USDA's 2007 survey. She concluded that in Washington State, where both conventional and organic apple production is concentrated, production costs are not much higher for organic producers than for conventional producers.

The third group of papers discusses the organic research and outreach activities underway in USDA's research, education and economics agencies. In her introduction, USDA Chief Scientist Woteki notes that organic systems offer significant potential for helping to address the agricultural challenges of our time. This section offers a window into some ways that USDA science programs are exploring that potential.

According to Smith, organic research is currently taking place in approximately 20 percent of USDA's Agricultural Research Service (ARS) research locations across the United States. Smith notes that many of the results from ARS organic research can be applied to conventional systems and vice versa. Research from USDA's Economic Research Service (ERS) shows that growth in the organic sector has been driven by consumer demand and Greene indicates that ERS has expanded its portfolio to include research on organic supply chains and consumer characteristics. USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service conducted the first-ever nationwide survey of organic producers in 2008, according to Buysse, and is collaborating with ERS to include organic samples in USDA's annual economic survey. O'Reilly describes the major programs that USDA's National Food and Agriculture Institute uses to fund extramural organic research, and indicates that these programs have expanded substantially in recent years.

The last set of papers examines organic agriculture and sustainability. In the first paper, Constance examines some of the social dimensions of organic agriculture. According to Constance, organic food production began as a social movement in the US many decades ago, but the tenor has changed substantially in recent years with the entry of large firms. In the final paper in the Proceedings—the closing keynote presentation at the conference—Scialaba widens our focus to examine organic agriculture's contribution to sustainability from an international perspective. She discusses a number of studies that examine the positive impacts of organic agriculture on soil fertility, energy use, and greenhouse gas emissions. Scialabba also notes the contribution of organic agriculture to social well-being and intergenerational equity through avoided harm and healthy community development.

Most of the conference sessions were streamed live by eOrganic—an online extension service supported by USDA—and are archived at www.extension.org.

有机农业系统研究会议:探索农艺、经济、生态和社会维度-会议录导言
在过去的十年里,有机食品的销售额在美国增长了两倍,行业分析师预测,这种快速的零售增长将持续到下一个十年。在国会的指导下,美国农业部通过建立并执行国家有机标准,在市场发展中发挥了关键作用。美国农业部的战略计划认识到有机经济的重要潜力,并设想从2009年到2015年,美国有机商业将增长25%。我们正在建立技术援助、保护项目和其他措施来帮助有机生产者。有机农业系统的研究也将在支持有机生产所需的增长以满足快速增长的需求方面发挥关键作用。2011年3月16日至18日,美国农业部在华盛顿特区召开了一次重要会议,审查有机农业系统的研究成果,包括许多长期项目。来自十多所大学和其他研究机构的研究人员介绍了有机农业系统在农艺、经济、生态和生活质量方面的实证研究结果。美国农业部内外的研究人员提出了有关有机农业系统的研究结果。这些会议记录中的论文被组织成会议代表的主要主题——长期实验的研究成果、生产者调查的研究成果和美国农业部的有机研究活动。会议还包括三场主题演讲。Reganold的开幕主题演讲解决了我们如何衡量和比较替代农业系统的影响的问题。他检查了特定指标和综合研究方法的使用,并注意到正在使用的参数集的扩展以及有机系统研究的机会集的扩展。第一组论文考察了美国爱荷华州、明尼苏达州、马里兰州和宾夕法尼亚州不同地区长期有机种植系统实验的农艺、经济和生态发现。所有四篇论文都提供了证据,证明有机玉米和大豆的产量可以与传统系统竞争,并且在盈利能力方面可以胜过传统系统。来自爱荷华州立大学长期农业生态(LTAR)实验的Delate的结果也表明,有机系统中土壤有机碳、总氮、可提取钾和钙的水平更高。库尔特还发现,在明尼苏达大学的可变投入作物管理系统试验中,有机系统中的颗粒物有机质和潜在的矿化碳含量较高。Cavigelli的观点文章考察了1996年在马里兰州建立的美国农业部贝尔茨维尔农业系统项目。该试验采用了三种不同轮作长度和复杂程度的有机粮食种植系统。研究结果表明,增加种植制度多样性可以改善有机系统的农艺、经济和环境绩效。在他的观点文章中,莫耶检查了罗代尔研究所农业系统试验的研究结果,该试验自1981年以来比较了有机系统和传统系统。莫耶认为,现在是时候采用新的、经济上可行的有机生产战略,以改善土壤健康,减少能源消耗,减少向大气中排放温室气体,并帮助减轻气候变化对作物生产的影响。在第二组论文中,经济学家根据美国农业部在全国范围内对生产者的调查数据,比较了有机系统和传统系统。2005年,美国农业部开始在其主要的年度经济调查中纳入有机生产者的目标样本。麦克布莱德使用了美国农业部2006年对大豆生产商的调查数据,发现生产有机大豆的总经济成本较高,产量较低,部分原因是有机生产中食用品种占主导地位,但价格溢价使2006年有机生产更有利可图。泰勒使用美国农业部2007年调查的数据,比较了两种估算美国有机苹果生产商和传统苹果生产商生产成本的方法。她的结论是,在华盛顿州,传统苹果和有机苹果都集中生产,有机苹果生产商的生产成本并不比传统苹果生产商高多少。第三组论文讨论了美国农业部研究、教育和经济机构正在进行的有机研究和推广活动。在她的介绍中,美国农业部首席科学家Woteki指出,有机系统为帮助解决我们这个时代的农业挑战提供了巨大的潜力。本节提供了一个窗口,了解美国农业部科学项目正在探索这种潜力的一些方法。根据史密斯的说法,目前美国农业部农业研究服务局(ARS)在全美大约20%的研究地点正在进行有机研究。 史密斯指出,ARS有机研究的许多结果可以应用于传统系统,反之亦然。美国农业部经济研究局(ERS)的研究表明,有机行业的增长是由消费者需求驱动的,格林指出,ERS已经扩大了其投资组合,包括对有机供应链和消费者特征的研究。据Buysse说,美国农业部国家农业统计局在2008年对有机生产商进行了首次全国调查,并正在与ERS合作,将有机样本纳入美国农业部的年度经济调查。O'Reilly描述了美国农业部国家食品和农业研究所用于资助校外有机研究的主要项目,并指出这些项目近年来已经大幅扩大。最后一组论文考察了有机农业和可持续性。在第一篇论文中,康斯坦斯考察了有机农业的一些社会层面。根据康斯坦斯的说法,有机食品生产在几十年前就开始在美国作为一项社会运动,但近年来随着大公司的进入,趋势发生了实质性的变化。在会议论文集的最后一篇论文——会议的闭幕主题演讲中,scialaba扩大了我们的焦点,从国际角度审视有机农业对可持续发展的贡献。她讨论了一些研究,这些研究检验了有机农业对土壤肥力、能源使用和温室气体排放的积极影响。Scialabba还指出,有机农业通过避免伤害和健康的社区发展,对社会福祉和代际公平作出了贡献。大多数会议都是由eorgan.com(美国农业部支持的在线扩展服务)直播的,并存档在www.extension.org上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信