Order of statistical learning depends on perceptive uncertainty

Tatsuya Daikoku , Masato Yumoto
{"title":"Order of statistical learning depends on perceptive uncertainty","authors":"Tatsuya Daikoku ,&nbsp;Masato Yumoto","doi":"10.1016/j.crneur.2023.100080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Statistical learning (SL) is an innate mechanism by which the brain automatically encodes the <em>n</em>-th order transition probability (TP) of a sequence and grasps the uncertainty of the TP distribution. Through SL, the brain predicts a subsequent event (<em>e</em><sub><em>n+1</em></sub>) based on the preceding events (<em>e</em><sub><em>n</em></sub>) that have a length of “<em>n”</em>. It is now known that uncertainty modulates prediction in top-down processing by the human predictive brain. However, the manner in which the human brain modulates the order of SL strategies based on the degree of uncertainty remains an open question. The present study examined how uncertainty modulates the neural effects of SL and whether differences in uncertainty alter the order of SL strategies. It used auditory sequences in which the uncertainty of sequential information is manipulated based on the conditional entropy. Three sequences with different TP ratios of 90:10, 80:20, and 67:33 were prepared as low-, intermediate, and high-uncertainty sequences, respectively (conditional entropy: 0.47, 0.72, and 0.92 bit, respectively). Neural responses were recorded when the participants listened to the three sequences. The results showed that stimuli with lower TPs elicited a stronger neural response than those with higher TPs, as demonstrated by a number of previous studies. Furthermore, we found that participants adopted higher-order SL strategies in the high uncertainty sequence. These results may indicate that the human brain has an ability to flexibly alter the order based on the uncertainty. This uncertainty may be an important factor that determines the order of SL strategies. Particularly, considering that a higher-order SL strategy mathematically allows the reduction of uncertainty in information, we assumed that the brain may take higher-order SL strategies when encountering high uncertain information in order to reduce the uncertainty. The present study may shed new light on understanding individual differences in SL performance across different uncertain situations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72752,"journal":{"name":"Current research in neurobiology","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100080"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10011828/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665945X23000086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Statistical learning (SL) is an innate mechanism by which the brain automatically encodes the n-th order transition probability (TP) of a sequence and grasps the uncertainty of the TP distribution. Through SL, the brain predicts a subsequent event (en+1) based on the preceding events (en) that have a length of “n”. It is now known that uncertainty modulates prediction in top-down processing by the human predictive brain. However, the manner in which the human brain modulates the order of SL strategies based on the degree of uncertainty remains an open question. The present study examined how uncertainty modulates the neural effects of SL and whether differences in uncertainty alter the order of SL strategies. It used auditory sequences in which the uncertainty of sequential information is manipulated based on the conditional entropy. Three sequences with different TP ratios of 90:10, 80:20, and 67:33 were prepared as low-, intermediate, and high-uncertainty sequences, respectively (conditional entropy: 0.47, 0.72, and 0.92 bit, respectively). Neural responses were recorded when the participants listened to the three sequences. The results showed that stimuli with lower TPs elicited a stronger neural response than those with higher TPs, as demonstrated by a number of previous studies. Furthermore, we found that participants adopted higher-order SL strategies in the high uncertainty sequence. These results may indicate that the human brain has an ability to flexibly alter the order based on the uncertainty. This uncertainty may be an important factor that determines the order of SL strategies. Particularly, considering that a higher-order SL strategy mathematically allows the reduction of uncertainty in information, we assumed that the brain may take higher-order SL strategies when encountering high uncertain information in order to reduce the uncertainty. The present study may shed new light on understanding individual differences in SL performance across different uncertain situations.

Abstract Image

统计学习的顺序取决于感知的不确定性
统计学习(SL)是大脑自动编码序列的n阶转移概率(TP)并掌握TP分布的不确定性的一种先天机制。通过SL,大脑基于长度为“n”的先前事件(en)预测后续事件(en+1)。现在已经知道,不确定性在人类预测大脑自上而下的处理中调节预测。然而,人脑根据不确定性程度调节SL策略顺序的方式仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。本研究考察了不确定性如何调节SL的神经效应,以及不确定性的差异是否会改变SL策略的顺序。它使用了听觉序列,其中基于条件熵来操纵序列信息的不确定性。将具有90:10、80:20和67:33的不同TP比率的三个序列分别制备为低、中和高不确定性序列(条件熵分别为0.47、0.72和0.92位)。当参与者听这三个序列时,会记录下神经反应。结果表明,TPs较低的刺激比TPs较高的刺激引发更强的神经反应,这一点在以前的一些研究中得到了证明。此外,我们发现参与者在高不确定性序列中采用了高阶SL策略。这些结果可能表明,人类大脑有能力根据不确定性灵活地改变顺序。这种不确定性可能是决定SL策略顺序的一个重要因素。特别是,考虑到高阶SL策略在数学上可以减少信息中的不确定性,我们假设大脑在遇到高度不确定性信息时可能会采取高阶SL战略,以减少不确定性。本研究可能为理解不同不确定情况下SL表现的个体差异提供新的线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信