Evaluation of the Western Australian Register of Developmental Anomalies: Thirty-five years of surveillance

Q Medicine
Wendy N. Nembhard, Carol Bower
{"title":"Evaluation of the Western Australian Register of Developmental Anomalies: Thirty-five years of surveillance","authors":"Wendy N. Nembhard,&nbsp;Carol Bower","doi":"10.1002/bdra.23575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The birth defects component of the Western Australian Register for Developmental Anomalies (WARDA-BD) was evaluated to assess its efficiency, effectiveness, and data quality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>WARDA-BD was evaluated using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention <span>2001</span> Guidelines for Evaluating Public Health Surveillance Systems and Data Quality Standards from the National Birth Defects Prevention Network. The evaluation included interviews with Register staff, local community organizations, parents, clinicians, and researchers; process observation; and secondary data analyses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>WARDA-BD is a statutory, statewide, population-based surveillance system established in 1980 that monitors approximately 30,000 births annually. Identification of eligible cases is for children up to age 6 years through active and passive ascertainment methods from multiple sources including birth, death, and hospitalization data; antenatal ultrasonography; hospital unit logs; medical records; fetal medicine departments; cytogenetic laboratories; specialty clinics; and pediatric surgery and pathology departments. Defect diagnoses are verified and coded using the 5-digit British Paediatric Association extension of the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision system. Register staff monitor Register data for completeness and accuracy resulting in high quality data with a low percentage of missing items.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Strengths of WARDA-BD include high data quality, timeliness, representativeness, stable funding, active community engagement, and high staff retention. Its data were used in numerous epidemiologic investigations resulting in &gt;325 peer-reviewed publications. Potential weaknesses include the limited number of variables collected and low visibility. Although WARDA-BD uses labor intensive case ascertainment and quality assurance and control processes, the Register provides accurate and essential data for stakeholders. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:894–904, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8983,"journal":{"name":"Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bdra.23575","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdra.23575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background

The birth defects component of the Western Australian Register for Developmental Anomalies (WARDA-BD) was evaluated to assess its efficiency, effectiveness, and data quality.

Methods

WARDA-BD was evaluated using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2001 Guidelines for Evaluating Public Health Surveillance Systems and Data Quality Standards from the National Birth Defects Prevention Network. The evaluation included interviews with Register staff, local community organizations, parents, clinicians, and researchers; process observation; and secondary data analyses.

Results

WARDA-BD is a statutory, statewide, population-based surveillance system established in 1980 that monitors approximately 30,000 births annually. Identification of eligible cases is for children up to age 6 years through active and passive ascertainment methods from multiple sources including birth, death, and hospitalization data; antenatal ultrasonography; hospital unit logs; medical records; fetal medicine departments; cytogenetic laboratories; specialty clinics; and pediatric surgery and pathology departments. Defect diagnoses are verified and coded using the 5-digit British Paediatric Association extension of the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision system. Register staff monitor Register data for completeness and accuracy resulting in high quality data with a low percentage of missing items.

Conclusion

Strengths of WARDA-BD include high data quality, timeliness, representativeness, stable funding, active community engagement, and high staff retention. Its data were used in numerous epidemiologic investigations resulting in >325 peer-reviewed publications. Potential weaknesses include the limited number of variables collected and low visibility. Although WARDA-BD uses labor intensive case ascertainment and quality assurance and control processes, the Register provides accurate and essential data for stakeholders. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:894–904, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

西澳大利亚发育异常登记册的评估:35年的监测
本研究对西澳大利亚发育异常登记处(WARDA-BD)的出生缺陷部分进行了评估,以评估其效率、有效性和数据质量。方法采用美国疾病控制与预防中心2001年公共卫生监测系统评估指南和国家出生缺陷预防网络数据质量标准对WARDA-BD进行评估。评估包括与登记册工作人员、当地社区组织、家长、临床医生和研究人员的访谈;过程的观察;二手数据分析。WARDA-BD是一个法定的、全州范围的、以人口为基础的监测系统,建立于1980年,每年监测大约3万名新生儿。通过包括出生、死亡和住院数据在内的多种来源的主动和被动确定方法,确定6岁以下儿童的合格病例;产前超声;医院单位日志;医疗记录;胎儿医学科;细胞遗传学实验室;专业诊所;还有儿科外科和病理科。缺陷诊断使用5位数字的英国儿科协会国际疾病分类第九次修订系统进行验证和编码。注册人员监控注册数据的完整性和准确性,从而获得高质量的数据,丢失项目的比例很低。结论WARDA-BD具有数据质量高、时效性强、代表性强、经费稳定、社区参与度高、人员留存率高等优势。它的数据被用于许多流行病学调查,导致325篇同行评议的出版物。潜在的弱点包括收集的变量数量有限和低可见性。虽然WARDA-BD使用劳动密集型的病例确定和质量保证和控制过程,但登记册为利益相关者提供了准确和必要的数据。出生缺陷研究(A辑)106:894-904,2016。©2016 Wiley期刊公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology
Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology 医药科学, 胎儿发育与产前诊断, 生殖系统/围生医学/新生儿
CiteScore
1.86
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信