The addition of dydrogesterone improves the outcomes of pregnant women with low progesterone levels when receiving vaginal progesterone alone as luteal support in HRT-FET cycles.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Reproductive Medicine and Biology Pub Date : 2023-03-22 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1002/rmb2.12511
Rena Toriumi, Michiharu Horikawa, Chie Sato, Nagisa Shimamura, Rena Ishii, Michiru Terashima, Michiko Hamada, Naoyuki Tachibana, Yuji Taketani
{"title":"The addition of dydrogesterone improves the outcomes of pregnant women with low progesterone levels when receiving vaginal progesterone alone as luteal support in HRT-FET cycles.","authors":"Rena Toriumi, Michiharu Horikawa, Chie Sato, Nagisa Shimamura, Rena Ishii, Michiru Terashima, Michiko Hamada, Naoyuki Tachibana, Yuji Taketani","doi":"10.1002/rmb2.12511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Vaginal progesterone (VP) alone has been used as luteal support (LS) in HRT-FET cycles without measuring serum progesterone concentrations (SPC) because it can achieve adequate intrauterine progesterone levels. However, several reports showed that the co-administration of progestin produced better outcomes than VP alone. We tried to address this discrepancy, focusing on SPC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>VP was given to 180 women undergoing HRT-FET. We measured SPC when pregnancy was diagnosed on day 14 of LS. We compared assisted reproductive technology outcomes between VP alone versus VP + dydrogesterone (D).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When using VP alone, average SPC in the miscarriage cases (9.6 ng/mL) were significantly lower compared with the ongoing pregnancy (OP) cases (14.7 ng/mL). The cut-off value for progesterone, 10.7 ng/mL, was a good predictor for the subsequent course of the pregnancy. Of 76 women receiving D ± VP from the start of LS and achieving a pregnancy, the numbers of OP were 44 (84.6%) in SPC ≥ 10.7 ng/mL and 20 (83.3%) in SPC ≤ 10.7 ng/mL with no significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VP alone resulted in lower SPC in some pregnant women in HRT-FET cycles and exhibited a lower OP rate. The co-administration of D improved an OP rate of low progesterone cases to the level comparable with non-low progesterone cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":21116,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Medicine and Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10032329/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12511","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Vaginal progesterone (VP) alone has been used as luteal support (LS) in HRT-FET cycles without measuring serum progesterone concentrations (SPC) because it can achieve adequate intrauterine progesterone levels. However, several reports showed that the co-administration of progestin produced better outcomes than VP alone. We tried to address this discrepancy, focusing on SPC.

Methods: VP was given to 180 women undergoing HRT-FET. We measured SPC when pregnancy was diagnosed on day 14 of LS. We compared assisted reproductive technology outcomes between VP alone versus VP + dydrogesterone (D).

Results: When using VP alone, average SPC in the miscarriage cases (9.6 ng/mL) were significantly lower compared with the ongoing pregnancy (OP) cases (14.7 ng/mL). The cut-off value for progesterone, 10.7 ng/mL, was a good predictor for the subsequent course of the pregnancy. Of 76 women receiving D ± VP from the start of LS and achieving a pregnancy, the numbers of OP were 44 (84.6%) in SPC ≥ 10.7 ng/mL and 20 (83.3%) in SPC ≤ 10.7 ng/mL with no significant difference.

Conclusion: VP alone resulted in lower SPC in some pregnant women in HRT-FET cycles and exhibited a lower OP rate. The co-administration of D improved an OP rate of low progesterone cases to the level comparable with non-low progesterone cases.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在 HRT-FET 周期中,如果仅使用阴道黄体酮作为黄体支持剂,加入地屈孕酮可改善孕酮水平低的孕妇的预后。
目的:由于阴道黄体酮(VP)可以达到足够的宫内孕酮水平,因此一直被单独用作 HRT-FET 周期的黄体支持(LS),而无需测量血清孕酮浓度(SPC)。然而,一些报告显示,联合使用孕激素比单独使用 VP 能产生更好的效果。我们试图解决这一差异,重点关注 SPC:180 名接受 HRT-FET 的妇女服用了 VP。我们在 LS 第 14 天确诊怀孕时测量了 SPC。我们比较了单用 VP 与 VP + 地屈孕酮(D)的辅助生殖技术结果:结果:单独使用 VP 时,流产病例的平均 SPC(9.6 纳克/毫升)明显低于持续妊娠病例(14.7 纳克/毫升)。孕酮的临界值(10.7 纳克/毫升)可以很好地预测随后的妊娠过程。在 76 名从 LS 开始就接受 D ± VP 并成功怀孕的女性中,SPC ≥ 10.7 纳克/毫升的 OP 为 44 例(84.6%),SPC ≤ 10.7 纳克/毫升的 OP 为 20 例(83.3%),差异不显著:结论:在 HRT-FET 周期中,单用 VP 会降低部分孕妇的 SPC,并降低 OP 率。联合使用 D 可将低孕酮孕妇的 OP 率提高到与非低孕酮孕妇相当的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Medicine and Biology (RMB) is the official English journal of the Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine, the Japan Society of Fertilization and Implantation, the Japan Society of Andrology, and publishes original research articles that report new findings or concepts in all aspects of reproductive phenomena in all kinds of mammals. Papers in any of the following fields will be considered: andrology, endocrinology, oncology, immunology, genetics, function of gonads and genital tracts, erectile dysfunction, gametogenesis, function of accessory sex organs, fertilization, embryogenesis, embryo manipulation, pregnancy, implantation, ontogenesis, infectious disease, contraception, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信