Radiological risk assessment of the Hunters Point Naval Shipyard (HPNS).

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY
Dennis J Paustenbach, Robert D Gibbons
{"title":"Radiological risk assessment of the Hunters Point Naval Shipyard (HPNS).","authors":"Dennis J Paustenbach,&nbsp;Robert D Gibbons","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2022.2118107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hunters Point Naval Shipyard in San Francisco, California was deemed a Superfund site by the USEPA in 1989 due to chemical and radiological contamination resulting from U.S. Navy operations from 1939 to 1974. During characterization and remediation efforts, over 50,000 radiological soil samples and 19,000 air samples were collected. This risk assessment, conducted in accordance with federal guidelines, represents the first comprehensive evaluation of past, present, and future health risks associated with radionuclides present at the site. The assessment indicated that before site remediation, most radionuclide soil concentrations were at or near local background concentrations. Had such low remedial goals not been established, significant remediation of surface soils would not have been necessary to protect human health. The pre-remediation lifetime incremental cancer morbidity risks for on-site workers and theoretical on-site residents due to radionuclide contamination were found to be 1.3 × 10<sup>-6</sup> and 3.2 × 10<sup>-6</sup>, respectively. The post-remediation risks to future on-site residents were found to be 6.3 × 10<sup>-8</sup> (without durable cover) and 3.7 × 10<sup>-8</sup> (with durable cover), while post-remediation risks to on-site workers were found to be 2.6 × 10<sup>-8</sup> (without durable cover) and 1.6 × 10<sup>-8</sup> (with durable cover). Risk estimates for all scenarios were found to be significantly below the acceptable risk of 3 × 10<sup>-4</sup> approved by regulatory agencies. Upwind and downwind air samples collected during remediation indicate that remediation activities never posed a measurable risk to off-site residents. This risk assessment emphasizes the importance of establishing clear and scientifically rigorous soil remedial goals at sites as well as understanding local radionuclide background concentrations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":"52 7","pages":"499-545"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2022.2118107","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hunters Point Naval Shipyard in San Francisco, California was deemed a Superfund site by the USEPA in 1989 due to chemical and radiological contamination resulting from U.S. Navy operations from 1939 to 1974. During characterization and remediation efforts, over 50,000 radiological soil samples and 19,000 air samples were collected. This risk assessment, conducted in accordance with federal guidelines, represents the first comprehensive evaluation of past, present, and future health risks associated with radionuclides present at the site. The assessment indicated that before site remediation, most radionuclide soil concentrations were at or near local background concentrations. Had such low remedial goals not been established, significant remediation of surface soils would not have been necessary to protect human health. The pre-remediation lifetime incremental cancer morbidity risks for on-site workers and theoretical on-site residents due to radionuclide contamination were found to be 1.3 × 10-6 and 3.2 × 10-6, respectively. The post-remediation risks to future on-site residents were found to be 6.3 × 10-8 (without durable cover) and 3.7 × 10-8 (with durable cover), while post-remediation risks to on-site workers were found to be 2.6 × 10-8 (without durable cover) and 1.6 × 10-8 (with durable cover). Risk estimates for all scenarios were found to be significantly below the acceptable risk of 3 × 10-4 approved by regulatory agencies. Upwind and downwind air samples collected during remediation indicate that remediation activities never posed a measurable risk to off-site residents. This risk assessment emphasizes the importance of establishing clear and scientifically rigorous soil remedial goals at sites as well as understanding local radionuclide background concentrations.

猎人角海军造船厂(HPNS)的辐射风险评估。
由于美国海军在1939年至1974年的行动中造成的化学和放射性污染,位于加利福尼亚州旧金山的猎人角海军造船厂在1989年被美国环保署认定为超级基金基地。在表征和修复工作中,收集了超过50,000个放射性土壤样本和19,000个空气样本。这项风险评估是根据联邦准则进行的,是对该场址存在的放射性核素过去、现在和未来的健康风险进行的首次全面评估。评价结果表明,在场地修复前,大多数土壤放射性核素浓度等于或接近当地本底浓度。如果没有制定如此低的补救目标,就没有必要对表层土壤进行大量补救,以保护人类健康。放射性核素污染对现场工作人员和理论现场居民的终生癌症发病率增量风险分别为1.3 × 10-6和3.2 × 10-6。修复后对未来现场居民的风险分别为6.3 × 10-8(无耐久盖)和3.7 × 10-8(有耐久盖),对现场工人的风险分别为2.6 × 10-8(无耐久盖)和1.6 × 10-8(有耐久盖)。所有情景的风险估计都明显低于监管机构批准的可接受风险3 × 10-4。在修复期间收集的逆风和顺风空气样本表明,修复活动从未对场外居民构成可测量的风险。这项风险评估强调了在场址建立明确和科学上严格的土壤补救目标以及了解当地放射性核素本底浓度的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
1.70%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Toxicology provides up-to-date, objective analyses of topics related to the mechanisms of action, responses, and assessment of health risks due to toxicant exposure. The journal publishes critical, comprehensive reviews of research findings in toxicology and the application of toxicological information in assessing human health hazards and risks. Toxicants of concern include commodity and specialty chemicals such as formaldehyde, acrylonitrile, and pesticides; pharmaceutical agents of all types; consumer products such as macronutrients and food additives; environmental agents such as ambient ozone; and occupational exposures such as asbestos and benzene.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信