Marta Kramer Mikkelsen, Nana Aviaja Frederikke Lindblom, Anne Dyhl-Polk, Carsten Bogh Juhl, Julia Sidenius Johansen, Dorte Nielsen
{"title":"Systematic review and meta-analysis of C-reactive protein as a biomarker in breast cancer.","authors":"Marta Kramer Mikkelsen, Nana Aviaja Frederikke Lindblom, Anne Dyhl-Polk, Carsten Bogh Juhl, Julia Sidenius Johansen, Dorte Nielsen","doi":"10.1080/10408363.2022.2050886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inflammation is an enabling characteristic of the hallmarks of cancer. There has therefore been increasing interest in the clinical value of circulating inflammatory biomarkers in cancer. In this review, we summarize results on C-reactive protein (CRP), alone or as part of the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS, composed of CRP and serum albumin), as a biomarker of prognosis or prediction and monitoring of therapeutic response in patients with breast cancer. A systematic literature search was performed in Medline and Embase from 1990 to August 2021. The association of serum CRP and overall survival and disease/progression-free survival was summarized in meta-analyses using a random effects model. The results from a total of 35 included studies (20,936 patients) were divided according to three identified patient settings (metastatic, non-metastatic, and general setting). Most of the studies examined prognostic utility. Several larger studies observed associations between high serum CRP and poor survival, but the meta-analyses suggested a limited value in a non-metastatic and general breast cancer setting (populations with unknown or varied disease stage). In metastatic patients, however, more consistent findings supported an association between serum CRP and prognosis (hazard ratio for overall survival: 1.87 (95% CI 1.31-2.67). Only five studies examined a role in prediction or monitoring of therapeutic response. One study reported a significant association between serum CRP levels and response to chemotherapy. Findings regarding serum CRP as a biomarker in breast cancer appear inconsistent, particularly in non-metastatic and general breast cancer, where the prognostic value could not be confirmed. In patients with metastatic breast cancer we suggest that high serum CRP is an indicator of poor prognosis. Too few studies assessed the role of serum CRP in prediction or monitoring of treatment response to allow conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10760,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","volume":"59 7","pages":"480-500"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2022.2050886","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
Inflammation is an enabling characteristic of the hallmarks of cancer. There has therefore been increasing interest in the clinical value of circulating inflammatory biomarkers in cancer. In this review, we summarize results on C-reactive protein (CRP), alone or as part of the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS, composed of CRP and serum albumin), as a biomarker of prognosis or prediction and monitoring of therapeutic response in patients with breast cancer. A systematic literature search was performed in Medline and Embase from 1990 to August 2021. The association of serum CRP and overall survival and disease/progression-free survival was summarized in meta-analyses using a random effects model. The results from a total of 35 included studies (20,936 patients) were divided according to three identified patient settings (metastatic, non-metastatic, and general setting). Most of the studies examined prognostic utility. Several larger studies observed associations between high serum CRP and poor survival, but the meta-analyses suggested a limited value in a non-metastatic and general breast cancer setting (populations with unknown or varied disease stage). In metastatic patients, however, more consistent findings supported an association between serum CRP and prognosis (hazard ratio for overall survival: 1.87 (95% CI 1.31-2.67). Only five studies examined a role in prediction or monitoring of therapeutic response. One study reported a significant association between serum CRP levels and response to chemotherapy. Findings regarding serum CRP as a biomarker in breast cancer appear inconsistent, particularly in non-metastatic and general breast cancer, where the prognostic value could not be confirmed. In patients with metastatic breast cancer we suggest that high serum CRP is an indicator of poor prognosis. Too few studies assessed the role of serum CRP in prediction or monitoring of treatment response to allow conclusions.
炎症是癌症的特征之一。因此,人们对循环炎症生物标志物在癌症中的临床价值越来越感兴趣。在这篇综述中,我们总结了c反应蛋白(CRP)单独或作为格拉斯哥预后评分(GPS,由CRP和血清白蛋白组成)的一部分,作为乳腺癌患者预后或预测和监测治疗反应的生物标志物的结果。从1990年到2021年8月在Medline和Embase进行了系统的文献检索。采用随机效应模型进行meta分析,总结血清CRP与总生存期和疾病/无进展生存期的关系。共纳入35项研究(20,936例患者)的结果根据三种确定的患者情况(转移性、非转移性和一般情况)进行划分。大多数研究考察了预后效用。几项较大的研究观察到高血清CRP与低生存率之间的关联,但荟萃分析表明,在非转移性和一般乳腺癌情况下(疾病分期未知或不同的人群),其价值有限。然而,在转移性患者中,更一致的发现支持血清CRP与预后之间的关联(总生存的危险比:1.87 (95% CI 1.31-2.67))。只有5项研究检查了在预测或监测治疗反应中的作用。一项研究报告了血清CRP水平与化疗反应之间的显著关联。关于血清CRP作为乳腺癌生物标志物的研究结果似乎不一致,特别是在非转移性乳腺癌和一般乳腺癌中,其预后价值无法证实。在转移性乳腺癌患者中,我们认为高血清CRP是预后不良的一个指标。评估血清CRP在预测或监测治疗反应中的作用的研究太少,无法得出结论。
期刊介绍:
Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences publishes comprehensive and high quality review articles in all areas of clinical laboratory science, including clinical biochemistry, hematology, microbiology, pathology, transfusion medicine, genetics, immunology and molecular diagnostics. The reviews critically evaluate the status of current issues in the selected areas, with a focus on clinical laboratory diagnostics and latest advances. The adjective “critical” implies a balanced synthesis of results and conclusions that are frequently contradictory and controversial.