Optimal positive airway pressure requirement and polysomnography indices of obstructive sleep apnea severity in the Saudi population.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Annals of Thoracic Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-25 DOI:10.4103/atm.atm_183_22
Ahmad A Bamagoos, Shahad A Alshaynawi, Atheer S Gari, Atheer M Badawi, Mudhawi H Alhiniah, Asma A Alshahrani, Renad R Rajab, Reem K Bahaj, Faris Alhejaili, Siraj O Wali
{"title":"Optimal positive airway pressure requirement and polysomnography indices of obstructive sleep apnea severity in the Saudi population.","authors":"Ahmad A Bamagoos,&nbsp;Shahad A Alshaynawi,&nbsp;Atheer S Gari,&nbsp;Atheer M Badawi,&nbsp;Mudhawi H Alhiniah,&nbsp;Asma A Alshahrani,&nbsp;Renad R Rajab,&nbsp;Reem K Bahaj,&nbsp;Faris Alhejaili,&nbsp;Siraj O Wali","doi":"10.4103/atm.atm_183_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Positive airway pressure (PAP) is the first-line therapy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Overnight PAP titration for determining optimal PAP requirements is expensive and often inconvenient. Prediction of optimal PAP requirements from diagnostic polysomnography via mathematical equations is possible but variable across populations.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to (1) determine the optimal PAP requirement, (2) determine differences in optimal PAP requirements across OSA severity groups, (3) determine the relationship between optimal PAP requirement and diagnostic polysomnography measurements of OSA severity, and (4) develop a pilot equation to predict the optimal PAP requirement from diagnostic polysomnography in a sample from the Saudi population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed records pertaining to adult OSA patients (<i>n</i> = 215; 63% of males) who underwent standardized diagnostic and titration polysomnography in our sleep laboratory between 2015 and 2019. Demographic, anthropometric, and clinical information were also collected for the analysis. Inferential statistics were performed for comparisons between diagnostic and titration studies and between OSA severity groups. Regression analyses were also performed to determine the potential predictors of optimal PAP requirements. Data were presented as the mean (± standard deviation) or median (25<sup>th</sup>-75<sup>th</sup> quartiles) according to normality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median optimal PAP requirement was 13 (9-17) cmH<sub>2</sub>O. The optimal PAP requirement was significantly greater for male versus female participants (14 [10-17] vs. 12 [8-16] cmH<sub>2</sub>O) and for participants with severe OSA (16 [12-20] cmH<sub>2</sub>O, <i>n</i> = 119) versus those with moderate (11 [8-14] cmH<sub>2</sub>O, <i>n</i> = 63) or mild (9 [7-12] cmH<sub>2</sub>O, <i>n</i> = 33) OSA. When combined, nadir oxygen saturation, oxygen desaturation index, and arousal index could be used to predict the optimal PAP requirement (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup>= 0.39, <i>F</i> = 34.0, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The optimal PAP requirement in the Saudi population is relatively high and directly correlated with OSA severity. Diagnostic polysomnography measurements of OSA severity predicted the optimal PAP requirement in this sample. Prospective validation is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":50760,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c7/00/ATM-18-31.PMC10034820.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/atm.atm_183_22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Positive airway pressure (PAP) is the first-line therapy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Overnight PAP titration for determining optimal PAP requirements is expensive and often inconvenient. Prediction of optimal PAP requirements from diagnostic polysomnography via mathematical equations is possible but variable across populations.

Aims: We aimed to (1) determine the optimal PAP requirement, (2) determine differences in optimal PAP requirements across OSA severity groups, (3) determine the relationship between optimal PAP requirement and diagnostic polysomnography measurements of OSA severity, and (4) develop a pilot equation to predict the optimal PAP requirement from diagnostic polysomnography in a sample from the Saudi population.

Methods: We analyzed records pertaining to adult OSA patients (n = 215; 63% of males) who underwent standardized diagnostic and titration polysomnography in our sleep laboratory between 2015 and 2019. Demographic, anthropometric, and clinical information were also collected for the analysis. Inferential statistics were performed for comparisons between diagnostic and titration studies and between OSA severity groups. Regression analyses were also performed to determine the potential predictors of optimal PAP requirements. Data were presented as the mean (± standard deviation) or median (25th-75th quartiles) according to normality.

Results: The median optimal PAP requirement was 13 (9-17) cmH2O. The optimal PAP requirement was significantly greater for male versus female participants (14 [10-17] vs. 12 [8-16] cmH2O) and for participants with severe OSA (16 [12-20] cmH2O, n = 119) versus those with moderate (11 [8-14] cmH2O, n = 63) or mild (9 [7-12] cmH2O, n = 33) OSA. When combined, nadir oxygen saturation, oxygen desaturation index, and arousal index could be used to predict the optimal PAP requirement (R 2= 0.39, F = 34.0, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The optimal PAP requirement in the Saudi population is relatively high and directly correlated with OSA severity. Diagnostic polysomnography measurements of OSA severity predicted the optimal PAP requirement in this sample. Prospective validation is warranted.

Abstract Image

沙特人群阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停严重程度的最佳气道正压需求和多导睡眠图指标。
背景:气道正压通气(PAP)是治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的一线药物。用于确定最佳PAP要求的过夜PAP滴定是昂贵的并且通常是不方便的。通过数学方程从诊断性多导睡眠图中预测最佳PAP需求是可能的,但在不同人群中是可变的。目的:我们旨在(1)确定最佳PAP要求,(2)确定OSA严重程度组之间最佳PAP需求的差异,(3)确定最优PAP要求与OSA严重性的诊断性多导睡眠图测量之间的关系,和(4)开发一个先导方程,以预测来自沙特人口样本的诊断性多导睡眠图的最佳PAP需求。方法:我们分析了2015年至2019年间在我们的睡眠实验室接受标准化诊断和滴定多导睡眠图检查的成年OSA患者(n=215;63%的男性)的记录。还收集了人口统计学、人体测量和临床信息进行分析。对诊断和滴定研究之间以及OSA严重程度组之间的比较进行推断统计。还进行了回归分析,以确定最佳PAP需求的潜在预测因素。根据正态性,数据以平均值(±标准差)或中位数(第25至75个四分位数)表示。结果:PAP的中位最佳需求量为13(9-17)cmH2O。男性参与者的最佳PAP需求显著高于女性参与者(14[10-17]vs.12[8-16]cmH2O),重度OSA参与者(16[12-20]cmH2O,n=119)的最优PAP需求明显高于中度(11[8-14]cmH2O,n=63)或轻度(9[7-12]cm H2O,n=33)OSA参与者。当将最低点氧饱和度、氧去饱和指数和唤醒指数相结合时,可用于预测最佳PAP需求量(R2=0.39,F=34.0,P<0.001)。结论:沙特人群的最佳PAP需要量相对较高,与OSA严重程度直接相关。OSA严重程度的诊断性多导睡眠图测量预测了该样本的最佳PAP需求。有必要进行前瞻性验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic Medicine
Annals of Thoracic Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal will cover studies related to multidisciplinary specialties of chest medicine, such as adult and pediatrics pulmonology, thoracic surgery, critical care medicine, respiratory care, transplantation, sleep medicine, related basic medical sciences, and more. The journal also features basic science, special reports, case reports, board review , and more. Editorials and communications to the editor that explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion by physicians dealing with chest medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信