The Party Politics of Englishness

IF 2.1 2区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Andrew Mycock, Richard Hayton
{"title":"The Party Politics of Englishness","authors":"Andrew Mycock,&nbsp;Richard Hayton","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00543.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>provides one of the first assessments of how British multi-national and English political parties have responded to existing and emergent identity tensions in England whilst continuing to defend the concept of the post-devolution British union-state.</li>\n \n <li>extends debates about multi-level party political systems in multi-national states which have typically focused on Scotland, Wales and, to a lesser extent, Northern Ireland.</li>\n \n <li>considers the potential that debates about English national identity could morph into a party politics of Englishness.</li>\n \n <li>assesses the potential for nascent English nationalism to encourage divergent party political responses to questions of English governance, citizenship and nation identity.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>This article assesses how the main British multi-national parties, whilst retaining an attachment of one form or another to the concept of the Union-state, have responded to existing and emergent identity tensions. Through examination of Labour, the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats, with brief discussion of the BNP, UKIP and the English Democrats, it will consider the impact of devolution and the threat of separatist nationalism on party approaches and policy choices concerning English identity construction and governance. It will also explore the extent to which devolution has compromised the ability of UK politicians to ‘speak of Britain’ (they rarely use the term UK) <i>and</i> the four composite nations. By comparing and contrasting the narratives articulated by parties at different levels of governance it will ask whether a nascent ‘party politics of Englishness’ has emerged which can accommodate these challenges.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51479,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Politics & International Relations","volume":"16 2","pages":"251-272"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00543.x","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Politics & International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00543.x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

  • provides one of the first assessments of how British multi-national and English political parties have responded to existing and emergent identity tensions in England whilst continuing to defend the concept of the post-devolution British union-state.
  • extends debates about multi-level party political systems in multi-national states which have typically focused on Scotland, Wales and, to a lesser extent, Northern Ireland.
  • considers the potential that debates about English national identity could morph into a party politics of Englishness.
  • assesses the potential for nascent English nationalism to encourage divergent party political responses to questions of English governance, citizenship and nation identity.

This article assesses how the main British multi-national parties, whilst retaining an attachment of one form or another to the concept of the Union-state, have responded to existing and emergent identity tensions. Through examination of Labour, the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats, with brief discussion of the BNP, UKIP and the English Democrats, it will consider the impact of devolution and the threat of separatist nationalism on party approaches and policy choices concerning English identity construction and governance. It will also explore the extent to which devolution has compromised the ability of UK politicians to ‘speak of Britain’ (they rarely use the term UK) and the four composite nations. By comparing and contrasting the narratives articulated by parties at different levels of governance it will ask whether a nascent ‘party politics of Englishness’ has emerged which can accommodate these challenges.

英国人的政党政治
提供了英国多民族和英国政党如何应对英格兰现有和新出现的身份紧张关系,同时继续捍卫权力下放后的英国联合国家概念的首批评估之一。扩展了关于多民族国家多层次政党政治制度的辩论,这些辩论通常集中在苏格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰(程度较小)。他认为,关于英国民族认同的辩论有可能演变成一场关于英国人特性的政党政治。评估了新生的英国民族主义的潜力,以鼓励不同政党对英国治理、公民身份和国家认同的问题作出不同的政治反应。本文评估了英国主要的多民族政党是如何在保持对联盟国家概念的某种形式的依恋的同时,对现有的和正在出现的身份紧张局势作出反应的。通过对工党、保守党和自由民主党的考察,以及对BNP、UKIP和英国民主党的简要讨论,它将考虑权力下放和分离主义民族主义的威胁对政党在英国身份建构和治理方面的做法和政策选择的影响。它还将探讨权力下放在多大程度上损害了英国政客“谈论英国”(他们很少使用“英国”这个词)和四个复合国家的能力。通过比较和对比不同治理水平的政党所阐述的叙述,它将询问新生的“英国政党政治”是否已经出现,可以适应这些挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: BJPIR provides an outlet for the best of British political science and of political science on Britain Founded in 1999, BJPIR is now based in the School of Politics at the University of Nottingham. It is a major refereed journal published by Blackwell Publishing under the auspices of the Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom. BJPIR is committed to acting as a broadly-based outlet for the best of British political science and of political science on Britain. A fully refereed journal, it publishes topical, scholarly work on significant debates in British scholarship and on all major political issues affecting Britain"s relationship to Europe and the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信