Moshe Phillip, Revital Nimri, Richard M Bergenstal, Katharine Barnard-Kelly, Thomas Danne, Roman Hovorka, Boris P Kovatchev, Laurel H Messer, Christopher G Parkin, Louise Ambler-Osborn, Stephanie A Amiel, Lia Bally, Roy W Beck, Sarah Biester, Torben Biester, Julia E Blanchette, Emanuele Bosi, Charlotte K Boughton, Marc D Breton, Sue A Brown, Bruce A Buckingham, Albert Cai, Anders L Carlson, Jessica R Castle, Pratik Choudhary, Kelly L Close, Claudio Cobelli, Amy B Criego, Elizabeth Davis, Carine de Beaufort, Martin I de Bock, Daniel J DeSalvo, J Hans DeVries, Klemen Dovc, Francis J Doyle, Laya Ekhlaspour, Naama Fisch Shvalb, Gregory P Forlenza, Geraldine Gallen, Satish K Garg, Dana C Gershenoff, Linda A Gonder-Frederick, Ahmad Haidar, Sara Hartnell, Lutz Heinemann, Simon Heller, Irl B Hirsch, Korey K Hood, Diana Isaacs, David C Klonoff, Olga Kordonouri, Aaron Kowalski, Lori Laffel, Julia Lawton, Rayhan A Lal, Lalantha Leelarathna, David M Maahs, Helen R Murphy, Kirsten Nørgaard, David O'Neal, Sean Oser, Tamara Oser, Eric Renard, Michael C Riddell, David Rodbard, Steven J Russell, Desmond A Schatz, Viral N Shah, Jennifer L Sherr, Gregg D Simonson, R Paul Wadwa, Candice Ward, Stuart A Weinzimer, Emma G Wilmot, Tadej Battelino
{"title":"Consensus Recommendations for the Use of Automated Insulin Delivery Technologies in Clinical Practice.","authors":"Moshe Phillip, Revital Nimri, Richard M Bergenstal, Katharine Barnard-Kelly, Thomas Danne, Roman Hovorka, Boris P Kovatchev, Laurel H Messer, Christopher G Parkin, Louise Ambler-Osborn, Stephanie A Amiel, Lia Bally, Roy W Beck, Sarah Biester, Torben Biester, Julia E Blanchette, Emanuele Bosi, Charlotte K Boughton, Marc D Breton, Sue A Brown, Bruce A Buckingham, Albert Cai, Anders L Carlson, Jessica R Castle, Pratik Choudhary, Kelly L Close, Claudio Cobelli, Amy B Criego, Elizabeth Davis, Carine de Beaufort, Martin I de Bock, Daniel J DeSalvo, J Hans DeVries, Klemen Dovc, Francis J Doyle, Laya Ekhlaspour, Naama Fisch Shvalb, Gregory P Forlenza, Geraldine Gallen, Satish K Garg, Dana C Gershenoff, Linda A Gonder-Frederick, Ahmad Haidar, Sara Hartnell, Lutz Heinemann, Simon Heller, Irl B Hirsch, Korey K Hood, Diana Isaacs, David C Klonoff, Olga Kordonouri, Aaron Kowalski, Lori Laffel, Julia Lawton, Rayhan A Lal, Lalantha Leelarathna, David M Maahs, Helen R Murphy, Kirsten Nørgaard, David O'Neal, Sean Oser, Tamara Oser, Eric Renard, Michael C Riddell, David Rodbard, Steven J Russell, Desmond A Schatz, Viral N Shah, Jennifer L Sherr, Gregg D Simonson, R Paul Wadwa, Candice Ward, Stuart A Weinzimer, Emma G Wilmot, Tadej Battelino","doi":"10.1210/endrev/bnac022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The significant and growing global prevalence of diabetes continues to challenge people with diabetes (PwD), healthcare providers, and payers. While maintaining near-normal glucose levels has been shown to prevent or delay the progression of the long-term complications of diabetes, a significant proportion of PwD are not attaining their glycemic goals. During the past 6 years, we have seen tremendous advances in automated insulin delivery (AID) technologies. Numerous randomized controlled trials and real-world studies have shown that the use of AID systems is safe and effective in helping PwD achieve their long-term glycemic goals while reducing hypoglycemia risk. Thus, AID systems have recently become an integral part of diabetes management. However, recommendations for using AID systems in clinical settings have been lacking. Such guided recommendations are critical for AID success and acceptance. All clinicians working with PwD need to become familiar with the available systems in order to eliminate disparities in diabetes quality of care. This report provides much-needed guidance for clinicians who are interested in utilizing AIDs and presents a comprehensive listing of the evidence payers should consider when determining eligibility criteria for AID insurance coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":11544,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine reviews","volume":"44 2","pages":"254-280"},"PeriodicalIF":22.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985411/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/endrev/bnac022","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The significant and growing global prevalence of diabetes continues to challenge people with diabetes (PwD), healthcare providers, and payers. While maintaining near-normal glucose levels has been shown to prevent or delay the progression of the long-term complications of diabetes, a significant proportion of PwD are not attaining their glycemic goals. During the past 6 years, we have seen tremendous advances in automated insulin delivery (AID) technologies. Numerous randomized controlled trials and real-world studies have shown that the use of AID systems is safe and effective in helping PwD achieve their long-term glycemic goals while reducing hypoglycemia risk. Thus, AID systems have recently become an integral part of diabetes management. However, recommendations for using AID systems in clinical settings have been lacking. Such guided recommendations are critical for AID success and acceptance. All clinicians working with PwD need to become familiar with the available systems in order to eliminate disparities in diabetes quality of care. This report provides much-needed guidance for clinicians who are interested in utilizing AIDs and presents a comprehensive listing of the evidence payers should consider when determining eligibility criteria for AID insurance coverage.
期刊介绍:
Endocrine Reviews, published bimonthly, features concise timely reviews updating key mechanistic and clinical concepts, alongside comprehensive, authoritative articles covering both experimental and clinical endocrinology themes. The journal considers topics informing clinical practice based on emerging and established evidence from clinical research. It also reviews advances in endocrine science stemming from studies in cell biology, immunology, pharmacology, genetics, molecular biology, neuroscience, reproductive medicine, and pediatric endocrinology.