A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials on the Efficacy and Safety of Pitavastatin.

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Adel Sadeq, Asim Ahmed Elnour, Hamad Farah Farah, Azza Ramadan, Mohamed A Baraka, Judit Don, Abdulla Al Amoodi, Kishore Gnana Sam, Nadia Al Mazrouei, Maisoun Alkaabi
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials on the Efficacy and Safety of Pitavastatin.","authors":"Adel Sadeq,&nbsp;Asim Ahmed Elnour,&nbsp;Hamad Farah Farah,&nbsp;Azza Ramadan,&nbsp;Mohamed A Baraka,&nbsp;Judit Don,&nbsp;Abdulla Al Amoodi,&nbsp;Kishore Gnana Sam,&nbsp;Nadia Al Mazrouei,&nbsp;Maisoun Alkaabi","doi":"10.2174/2772432817666220531115314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A subpopulation of statin users such as subjects with chronic kidney disease (CKD), Human Immune virus (HIV), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), revascularization, metabolic syndrome, and/or diabetes may particularly benefit from pitavastatin pharmacotherapy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The current systematic review aimed systematically to evaluate the effect of pitavastatin on primary cardiac events in subjects receiving pitavastatin in comparison to the other four statin members.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review on phases III and IV of randomized controlled trials (RCT-s, 11 trials) for subjects with primary cardiac events who received pitavastatin. Subjects diagnosed with any type of dyslipidemia (population 4804) and received pitavastatin (interventions) versus comparator (comparison) with the primary efficacy endpoint of minimization of LDL-C and non- HDL-C, had an increase in HDL-C and/or reduction in major adverse cardiac events (MACE, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (fatal/nonfatal), and stroke (fatal/nonfatal) and/or their composite (outcomes). The secondary safety endpoint was the development of any adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the included trials (11), participants (4804) were randomized for pitavastatin or its comparators such as atorvastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, simvastatin and followed up for 12 to 52 weeks. In terms of the primary outcome (reduction in LDL-C), pitavastatin 4 mg was superior to pravastatin 40 mg in three trials, while the 2 mg pitavastatin was comparable to atorvastatin 10 mg in four trials and simvastatin 20 and 40 mg in two 2 trials. However, rosuvastatin 2.5 mg was superior to pitavastatin 2 mg in two trials. Pitavastatin increased HDL-C and reduced non-HDL-C in eleven trials. Regarding the safety profile, pitavastatin has proved to be tolerated and safe.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FDA-approved indications for pitavastatin included primary dyslipidemia and mixed dyslipidemia as a supplementary therapy to dietary changes to lower total cholesterol, LDL-C, apolipoprotein B (Apo B), triglycerides (TG), and enhance HDL-C. Pitavastatin might be suitable for subjects with diabetes, ACS (reduced revascularization), metabolic syndrome, CKD, HIV, and subjects with low levels of HDL-C. We highly recommend rational individualization for the selection of statin.</p>","PeriodicalId":29871,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology","volume":"18 2","pages":"120-147"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2772432817666220531115314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: A subpopulation of statin users such as subjects with chronic kidney disease (CKD), Human Immune virus (HIV), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), revascularization, metabolic syndrome, and/or diabetes may particularly benefit from pitavastatin pharmacotherapy.

Aim: The current systematic review aimed systematically to evaluate the effect of pitavastatin on primary cardiac events in subjects receiving pitavastatin in comparison to the other four statin members.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review on phases III and IV of randomized controlled trials (RCT-s, 11 trials) for subjects with primary cardiac events who received pitavastatin. Subjects diagnosed with any type of dyslipidemia (population 4804) and received pitavastatin (interventions) versus comparator (comparison) with the primary efficacy endpoint of minimization of LDL-C and non- HDL-C, had an increase in HDL-C and/or reduction in major adverse cardiac events (MACE, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (fatal/nonfatal), and stroke (fatal/nonfatal) and/or their composite (outcomes). The secondary safety endpoint was the development of any adverse effects.

Results: In the included trials (11), participants (4804) were randomized for pitavastatin or its comparators such as atorvastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, simvastatin and followed up for 12 to 52 weeks. In terms of the primary outcome (reduction in LDL-C), pitavastatin 4 mg was superior to pravastatin 40 mg in three trials, while the 2 mg pitavastatin was comparable to atorvastatin 10 mg in four trials and simvastatin 20 and 40 mg in two 2 trials. However, rosuvastatin 2.5 mg was superior to pitavastatin 2 mg in two trials. Pitavastatin increased HDL-C and reduced non-HDL-C in eleven trials. Regarding the safety profile, pitavastatin has proved to be tolerated and safe.

Conclusion: The FDA-approved indications for pitavastatin included primary dyslipidemia and mixed dyslipidemia as a supplementary therapy to dietary changes to lower total cholesterol, LDL-C, apolipoprotein B (Apo B), triglycerides (TG), and enhance HDL-C. Pitavastatin might be suitable for subjects with diabetes, ACS (reduced revascularization), metabolic syndrome, CKD, HIV, and subjects with low levels of HDL-C. We highly recommend rational individualization for the selection of statin.

匹伐他汀疗效和安全性随机临床试验的系统综述。
背景:慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)、人类免疫病毒(HIV)、急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)、血运重建术、代谢综合征和/或糖尿病患者等他汀类药物使用者亚群可能特别受益于匹伐他汀药物治疗。目的:本系统综述旨在系统地评价匹伐他汀与其他四种他汀类药物相比对匹伐他汀治疗患者原发性心脏事件的影响。方法:我们对接受匹伐他汀治疗的原发性心脏病患者的III期和IV期随机对照试验(RCT-s, 11项试验)进行了系统回顾。诊断为任何类型血脂异常的受试者(4804人),接受匹伐他汀(干预)与对照(比较),主要疗效终点为LDL-C和非HDL-C最小化,HDL-C升高和/或主要心脏不良事件(MACE,心血管死亡,心肌梗死(致命/非致命),卒中(致命/非致命)和/或其复合(结局)。次要安全终点是任何不良反应的发生。结果:在纳入的试验(11)中,参与者(4804)随机选择匹伐他汀或其比较物如阿托伐他汀、普伐他汀、瑞舒伐他汀、辛伐他汀,随访12 ~ 52周。在主要结局(降低LDL-C)方面,匹伐他汀4mg在3项试验中优于普伐他汀40mg,而匹伐他汀2mg在4项试验中优于阿托伐他汀10mg,在2项试验中优于辛伐他汀20mg和40mg。然而,在两项试验中,瑞舒伐他汀2.5 mg优于匹伐他汀2 mg。在11项试验中,匹伐他汀增加HDL-C并降低非HDL-C。关于安全性,匹伐他汀已被证明是耐受性和安全性的。结论:fda批准的匹伐他汀适应症包括原发性血脂异常和混合性血脂异常,可作为饮食改变的补充治疗,降低总胆固醇、LDL-C、载脂蛋白B (Apo B)、甘油三酯(TG),并提高HDL-C。匹伐他汀可能适用于糖尿病、ACS(血运重建减少)、代谢综合征、CKD、HIV和低水平HDL-C的患者。我们强烈建议合理个体化选择他汀类药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
55
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信