Does stronger primary care improve access to health services for persons with spinal cord injury? Evidence from eleven European countries.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-27 DOI:10.1080/10790268.2023.2188390
Olena Bychkovska, Piotr Tederko, Vegard Strøm, Alvydas Juocevicius, Armin Gemperli
{"title":"Does stronger primary care improve access to health services for persons with spinal cord injury? Evidence from eleven European countries.","authors":"Olena Bychkovska, Piotr Tederko, Vegard Strøm, Alvydas Juocevicius, Armin Gemperli","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2023.2188390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the association between the strength of primary care and perceived access to follow-up care services among persons with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Data analysis of the International Spinal Cord Injury (InSCI) cross-sectional, community-based questionnaire survey conducted in 2017-2019. The association between the strength of primary care (Kringos <i>et al</i>., 2003) and access to health services was established using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis, adjusted for socio-demographic and health status characteristics.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community in eleven European countries: France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Spain and Switzerland.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>6658 adults with chronic SCI.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Share of persons with SCI that reported unmet healthcare needs as a measure of access.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve percent of the participants reported unmet healthcare needs: the highest in Poland (25%) and lowest in Switzerland and Spain (7%). The most prevalent access restriction was service unavailability (7%). Stronger primary care was associated with lower odds of reporting unmet healthcare needs, service unavailability, unaffordability and unacceptability. Females, persons of younger age and lower health status, had higher odds of reporting unmet needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In all investigated countries, persons with chronic SCI face access barriers, especially with service availability. Stronger primary care for the general population was also associated with better health service access for persons with SCI, which argues for further primary care strengthening.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"701-711"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11378665/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2023.2188390","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the association between the strength of primary care and perceived access to follow-up care services among persons with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI).

Design: Data analysis of the International Spinal Cord Injury (InSCI) cross-sectional, community-based questionnaire survey conducted in 2017-2019. The association between the strength of primary care (Kringos et al., 2003) and access to health services was established using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis, adjusted for socio-demographic and health status characteristics.

Setting: Community in eleven European countries: France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Spain and Switzerland.

Participants: 6658 adults with chronic SCI.

Intervention: None.

Outcome measures: Share of persons with SCI that reported unmet healthcare needs as a measure of access.

Results: Twelve percent of the participants reported unmet healthcare needs: the highest in Poland (25%) and lowest in Switzerland and Spain (7%). The most prevalent access restriction was service unavailability (7%). Stronger primary care was associated with lower odds of reporting unmet healthcare needs, service unavailability, unaffordability and unacceptability. Females, persons of younger age and lower health status, had higher odds of reporting unmet needs.

Conclusions: In all investigated countries, persons with chronic SCI face access barriers, especially with service availability. Stronger primary care for the general population was also associated with better health service access for persons with SCI, which argues for further primary care strengthening.

加强初级保健是否能改善脊髓损伤患者获得医疗服务的机会?来自 11 个欧洲国家的证据。
目的确定慢性脊髓损伤(SCI)患者接受初级保健的强度与获得后续护理服务的感知之间的关联:对 2017-2019 年开展的国际脊髓损伤(InSCI)横断面社区问卷调查进行数据分析。通过单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,并根据社会人口学和健康状况特征进行调整,确定了初级保健强度(Kringos等人,2003年)与获得医疗服务之间的关联:背景:11 个欧洲国家的社区:环境:11 个欧洲国家的社区:法国、德国、希腊、意大利、立陶宛、荷兰、挪威、波兰、罗马尼亚、西班牙和瑞士:干预措施:无:干预措施:无:干预措施:无。结果测量:报告医疗保健需求未得到满足的 SCI 患者所占比例,以此作为获得医疗保健服务的衡量标准:12%的参与者报告医疗保健需求未得到满足:波兰最高(25%),瑞士和西班牙最低(7%)。最普遍的就医限制是无法获得服务(7%)。较强的初级保健与报告医疗保健需求未得到满足、服务不可用、负担不起和不可接受的几率较低有关。女性、年龄较小者和健康状况较差者报告未满足需求的几率较高:在所有接受调查的国家中,慢性 SCI 患者都面临着就医障碍,尤其是在服务可用性方面。加强对普通人群的初级保健也与改善 SCI 患者获得医疗服务的机会有关,因此需要进一步加强初级保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信