Medición de la pérdida ósea glenoidea y defecto de Hill-Sachs por resonancia magnética: estudio de correlación y concordancia con la medición por tomografía computarizada

Salvador José Gómez Bermúdez , Andrés Julián Uribe Jimenez , Jose Bareño Silva , Mauricio Estrada Castrillón , Juan Carlos Jaramillo Fernández
{"title":"Medición de la pérdida ósea glenoidea y defecto de Hill-Sachs por resonancia magnética: estudio de correlación y concordancia con la medición por tomografía computarizada","authors":"Salvador José Gómez Bermúdez ,&nbsp;Andrés Julián Uribe Jimenez ,&nbsp;Jose Bareño Silva ,&nbsp;Mauricio Estrada Castrillón ,&nbsp;Juan Carlos Jaramillo Fernández","doi":"10.1016/j.rccot.2022.04.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The aim is to define whether the measurement of glenoid and Hill–Sachs defects by magnetic resonance imaging is equivalent to the measurement by simple tomography in patients with anterior shoulder instability.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Descriptive, observational, cross-sectional study of a cohort of imaging studies of patients with a history of anterior shoulder dislocation, comprising magnetic resonance and simple tomography of the shoulder, performed in a fourth level hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The cohort consisted of 20 cases; a high and statistically significant correlation was found for the measurement of the glenoid diameter and defect, with a <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05 between the MRI and simple tomography. In addition, the Hill–Sachs interval measurement was found to be statistically significant, but the correlation index was not high, 60%. For intraobserver agreement, a Kappa index was calculated for MRI of 0.8 compared to CT with <em>p</em>-value &lt;0.05 significant for engaging and non-engaging defects.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Simple MRI is a reliable imaging method with high correlation index for the measurement of diameter and glenoid defects with good agreement to establish whether Hill–Sachs defects are engaging or not.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>Level III</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101098,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Ortopedia y Traumatología","volume":"36 1","pages":"Pages 9-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de Ortopedia y Traumatología","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0120884522000116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The aim is to define whether the measurement of glenoid and Hill–Sachs defects by magnetic resonance imaging is equivalent to the measurement by simple tomography in patients with anterior shoulder instability.

Materials and methods

Descriptive, observational, cross-sectional study of a cohort of imaging studies of patients with a history of anterior shoulder dislocation, comprising magnetic resonance and simple tomography of the shoulder, performed in a fourth level hospital.

Results

The cohort consisted of 20 cases; a high and statistically significant correlation was found for the measurement of the glenoid diameter and defect, with a p < 0.05 between the MRI and simple tomography. In addition, the Hill–Sachs interval measurement was found to be statistically significant, but the correlation index was not high, 60%. For intraobserver agreement, a Kappa index was calculated for MRI of 0.8 compared to CT with p-value <0.05 significant for engaging and non-engaging defects.

Conclusion

Simple MRI is a reliable imaging method with high correlation index for the measurement of diameter and glenoid defects with good agreement to establish whether Hill–Sachs defects are engaging or not.

Level of Evidence

Level III

磁共振测量关节骨丢失和希尔-萨克斯缺损:与ct测量的相关性和一致性研究
目的是确定磁共振成像测量肩关节和Hill-Sachs缺陷是否等同于肩关节前路不稳患者的简单断层扫描测量。材料和方法描述性、观察性、横断面研究在一家四级医院对有肩关节前脱位史的患者进行影像学研究,包括磁共振和简单肩关节断层扫描。结果本组共20例;关节盂直径和关节缺损的测量具有高度和统计学意义的相关性,p <MRI与单纯断层扫描差异0.05。此外,Hill-Sachs区间测量发现具有统计学显著性,但相关指数不高,为60%。为了观察者内部的一致,与CT相比,计算出MRI的Kappa指数为0.8,p值<0.05对于接合缺陷和非接合缺陷具有显著意义。结论简单MRI是一种可靠的影像学方法,相关指数高,可用于测量关节盂缺损直径和关节盂缺损是否累及。证据等级:III级
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信