Principles and practice: Towards disaster risk reduction in New South Wales, Australia

Alice Conant, Graham Brewer
{"title":"Principles and practice: Towards disaster risk reduction in New South Wales, Australia","authors":"Alice Conant,&nbsp;Graham Brewer","doi":"10.1016/j.ugj.2022.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>By ratifying the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (SFDRR), the Australian Government has accepted the need to mainstream disaster risk reduction (DRR) principles into policy and procedures. This research explores the extent to which this rhetoric has been actioned, using local-government policy as an indicator. The rationale for this approach is that evidence of DRR integration should be observable in recovery procedures related to the aftermath of disasters, which could extend over a period of years and require transformational changes. Using the targets and priorities of the SFDRR, a meta-synthesis of research conducted since its ratification was used to create a conceptual framework of DRR principles and practices. This framework was then used to conduct a policy analysis of the New South Wales Local Disaster Recovery Plan (NSWLDRP) template for alignment/non-alignment to the principles of the SFDRR, with the intention of indicating where future efforts in policy development should be directed.</p><p>The analysis revealed gaps in intent between the NSWLDRP template and DRR principles and practices. While some underlying concepts of DRR are incorporated into the plan, such as vulnerability assessments and communication tools, fundamental risk reduction policies, including prevention, mitigation and participatory mechanisms are largely absent. This gap between the principles of the SFDRR and its limited application at the local level in NSW highlights the need for greater mainstreaming of DRR principles in both State and Federal Government frameworks since they direct both local disaster management arrangements and subsequent ongoing community development. The benefits of this includes reduced load on emergency services during extreme events, and increased community resilience after them, including reduced reconstruction and less disruption to community productivity in their aftermath.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101266,"journal":{"name":"Urban Governance","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 285-295"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266432862200047X/pdfft?md5=06e6526e7204bcf61460f27ccae9848d&pid=1-s2.0-S266432862200047X-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266432862200047X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

By ratifying the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (SFDRR), the Australian Government has accepted the need to mainstream disaster risk reduction (DRR) principles into policy and procedures. This research explores the extent to which this rhetoric has been actioned, using local-government policy as an indicator. The rationale for this approach is that evidence of DRR integration should be observable in recovery procedures related to the aftermath of disasters, which could extend over a period of years and require transformational changes. Using the targets and priorities of the SFDRR, a meta-synthesis of research conducted since its ratification was used to create a conceptual framework of DRR principles and practices. This framework was then used to conduct a policy analysis of the New South Wales Local Disaster Recovery Plan (NSWLDRP) template for alignment/non-alignment to the principles of the SFDRR, with the intention of indicating where future efforts in policy development should be directed.

The analysis revealed gaps in intent between the NSWLDRP template and DRR principles and practices. While some underlying concepts of DRR are incorporated into the plan, such as vulnerability assessments and communication tools, fundamental risk reduction policies, including prevention, mitigation and participatory mechanisms are largely absent. This gap between the principles of the SFDRR and its limited application at the local level in NSW highlights the need for greater mainstreaming of DRR principles in both State and Federal Government frameworks since they direct both local disaster management arrangements and subsequent ongoing community development. The benefits of this includes reduced load on emergency services during extreme events, and increased community resilience after them, including reduced reconstruction and less disruption to community productivity in their aftermath.

原则和实践:在澳大利亚新南威尔士州减少灾害风险
通过批准《仙台减少灾害风险框架》,澳大利亚政府承认有必要将减少灾害风险原则纳入政策和程序的主流。本研究以地方政府政策为指标,探讨了这种修辞在多大程度上被付诸行动。这一方法的基本原理是,在与灾害后果有关的恢复程序中,应该可以观察到纳入减灾风险的证据,这可能会持续数年,需要进行转型变革。利用SFDRR的目标和优先事项,对自其批准以来进行的研究进行了综合,以创建DRR原则和实践的概念框架。然后,该框架被用于对新南威尔士州地方灾难恢复计划(NSWLDRP)模板进行政策分析,以便与SFDRR的原则保持一致/不一致,目的是指示政策制定的未来努力方向。分析揭示了NSWLDRP模板与DRR原则和实践之间的意图差距。虽然减少风险风险的一些基本概念纳入了该计划,如脆弱性评估和沟通工具,但基本的减少风险政策,包括预防、缓解和参与机制基本上没有。SFDRR原则及其在新南威尔士州地方一级的有限应用之间的差距突出表明,需要在州和联邦政府框架中进一步将DRR原则纳入主流,因为它们既指导地方灾害管理安排,也指导随后的持续社区发展。这样做的好处包括在极端事件期间减少紧急服务的负担,并在极端事件发生后提高社区的复原力,包括减少重建工作,减少灾后对社区生产力的破坏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信