The Parallax Effect in the Evaluation of Range of Motion in Lumbar Total Disc Replacement

Joshua D. Auerbach MD , Surena Namdari MD , Andrew H. Milby BA , Andrew P. White MD , Sudheer C. Reddy MD , Baron S. Lonner MD , Richard A. Balderston MD
{"title":"The Parallax Effect in the Evaluation of Range of Motion in Lumbar Total Disc Replacement","authors":"Joshua D. Auerbach MD ,&nbsp;Surena Namdari MD ,&nbsp;Andrew H. Milby BA ,&nbsp;Andrew P. White MD ,&nbsp;Sudheer C. Reddy MD ,&nbsp;Baron S. Lonner MD ,&nbsp;Richard A. Balderston MD","doi":"10.1016/S1935-9810(08)70037-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Range of motion (ROM) has been shown to influence clinical outcomes of total disc replacement (TDR). While the parallax effect in image acquisition has been shown in the literature to influence the accuracy of a variety of measurements, this concept has not been investigated in the assessment of ROM analysis following TDR.</p><p>We performed an evaluation of the influence of radiograph beam angle on “by hand” and on “gold standard” flexion-extension ROM measurements in lumbar total disc replacement. The purpose of this study is to determine (1) the influence of X-ray beam angle on index level angle (ILA) measurements in lumbar TDR using the keel method, and (2) whether the out-of-plane radiographic beam effects cause a difference between true and calculated range of motion.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eight blinded orthopaedic surgeons used the keel method to calculate ROM measurements from radiographs of a flexible Sawbones model (Pacific Research Laboratories, Inc., Vashon, Washington) implanted with a ProDisc-L device (Synthes Spine, West Chester, Pennsylvania). Radiographs were obtained at beam angles of 0°, 5°, 10°, and 15° in the sagittal plane from the device center. Calculations were compared to measurements obtained by a validated digitized software method (Quantitative Motion Analysis, QMA, Medical Metrics, Inc., Houston, Texas). Inter- and intraobserver precision and accuracy were determined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared with QMA, the radiographic keel method had an average error of 3.7°. No significant effect of variation in beam angle on interobserver precision (N<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->16, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.92) or accuracy (N<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->16, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.86) or intraobserver precision (N<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->8, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.09) or accuracy (N<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->8, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.07) of ROM measurements was identified. Repeat testing with QMA also revealed no effect of parallax and resulted in nearly identical ROM measurements.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Accuracy and precision of the keel method to determine ROM from index level angle measurements after TDR was not affected by increases in X-ray beam angles up to 15̊ from the device center.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><p>Our study demonstrates that range of motion measurements are not influenced by parallax effect when using the keel method to determine index level angle measurements in lumbar total disc replacement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88695,"journal":{"name":"SAS journal","volume":"2 4","pages":"Pages 184-188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1935-9810(08)70037-9","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935981008700379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background

Range of motion (ROM) has been shown to influence clinical outcomes of total disc replacement (TDR). While the parallax effect in image acquisition has been shown in the literature to influence the accuracy of a variety of measurements, this concept has not been investigated in the assessment of ROM analysis following TDR.

We performed an evaluation of the influence of radiograph beam angle on “by hand” and on “gold standard” flexion-extension ROM measurements in lumbar total disc replacement. The purpose of this study is to determine (1) the influence of X-ray beam angle on index level angle (ILA) measurements in lumbar TDR using the keel method, and (2) whether the out-of-plane radiographic beam effects cause a difference between true and calculated range of motion.

Methods

Eight blinded orthopaedic surgeons used the keel method to calculate ROM measurements from radiographs of a flexible Sawbones model (Pacific Research Laboratories, Inc., Vashon, Washington) implanted with a ProDisc-L device (Synthes Spine, West Chester, Pennsylvania). Radiographs were obtained at beam angles of 0°, 5°, 10°, and 15° in the sagittal plane from the device center. Calculations were compared to measurements obtained by a validated digitized software method (Quantitative Motion Analysis, QMA, Medical Metrics, Inc., Houston, Texas). Inter- and intraobserver precision and accuracy were determined.

Results

Compared with QMA, the radiographic keel method had an average error of 3.7°. No significant effect of variation in beam angle on interobserver precision (N = 16, P = .92) or accuracy (N = 16, P = 0.86) or intraobserver precision (N = 8, P = .09) or accuracy (N = 8, P = 0.07) of ROM measurements was identified. Repeat testing with QMA also revealed no effect of parallax and resulted in nearly identical ROM measurements.

Conclusions

Accuracy and precision of the keel method to determine ROM from index level angle measurements after TDR was not affected by increases in X-ray beam angles up to 15̊ from the device center.

Clinical Relevance

Our study demonstrates that range of motion measurements are not influenced by parallax effect when using the keel method to determine index level angle measurements in lumbar total disc replacement.

视差对腰椎全椎间盘置换术中活动范围评价的影响
活动范围(ROM)已被证明影响全椎间盘置换术(TDR)的临床结果。虽然文献显示图像采集中的视差效应会影响各种测量的准确性,但这一概念尚未在TDR后ROM分析的评估中进行研究。我们评估了在腰椎全椎间盘置换术中x线片束角对“手工”和“金标准”屈伸ROM测量的影响。本研究的目的是确定(1)使用龙骨法测量腰椎TDR时x射线束角对指数水平角(ILA)测量的影响,以及(2)平面外射线束效应是否会导致真实运动范围与计算的运动范围之间的差异。方法8名盲法骨科医生使用龙骨法从植入ProDisc-L装置(Synthes Spine, West Chester, Pennsylvania)的柔性Sawbones模型(Pacific Research Laboratories, Inc., Vashon, Washington)的x线片上计算ROM测量值。在矢状面距离装置中心0°、5°、10°和15°的光束角度拍摄x线片。将计算结果与经过验证的数字化软件方法(Quantitative Motion Analysis, QMA, Medical Metrics, Inc, Houston, Texas)获得的测量结果进行比较。测定了观察者间和观察者内的精度和准确度。结果与QMA相比,x线龙骨法的平均误差为3.7°。波束角度的变化对ROM测量的观察者间精度(N = 16, P = 0.92)、准确度(N = 16, P = 0.86)、观察者内精度(N = 8, P = 0.09)和准确度(N = 8, P = 0.07)均无显著影响。用QMA重复测试也显示没有视差的影响,并导致几乎相同的ROM测量。结论龙骨法在TDR后通过指数水平角测量ROM的准确度和精密度不受x射线束角度从装置中心增加15°的影响。临床相关性我们的研究表明,在腰椎全椎间盘置换术中使用龙骨法测定指数水平角时,运动范围测量不受视差效应的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信