Attentional bias in individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder: A preliminary eye-tracking study

IF 1.7 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Mairead Mullen , Donncha Hanna , Maria Bradley , Dave Rogers , Julie-Ann Jordan , Kevin F.W. Dyer
{"title":"Attentional bias in individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder: A preliminary eye-tracking study","authors":"Mairead Mullen ,&nbsp;Donncha Hanna ,&nbsp;Maria Bradley ,&nbsp;Dave Rogers ,&nbsp;Julie-Ann Jordan ,&nbsp;Kevin F.W. Dyer","doi":"10.1016/j.jbct.2020.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Attentional biases have been overlooked as a treatment focus in CBT practice. This pilot study examined patterns of attentional bias in an OCD clinical sample with a view to understanding the key mechanisms in order to inform assessment and intervention. It was hypothesised that individuals with OCD would demonstrate vigilance, delayed disengagement, and maintenance attentional biases towards OCD-related stimuli relative to a matched control group. Participants with OCD (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->16) were compared with healthy controls (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->16) matched by age and gender. Vigilance, disengagement and maintenance biases were measured by recording eye-movements during a free gaze task in which pairs of neutral-OCD and neutral-aversive images were presented. The OCD group demonstrated no evidence of vigilance or delayed disengagement biases toward OCD stimuli but did exhibit a maintenance bias towards OCD and, to a lesser extent, general aversive images. Clinical implications include the assessment of patient attentional biases to aid CBT interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","volume":"31 2","pages":"Pages 199-204"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jbct.2020.10.005","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589979120300482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Attentional biases have been overlooked as a treatment focus in CBT practice. This pilot study examined patterns of attentional bias in an OCD clinical sample with a view to understanding the key mechanisms in order to inform assessment and intervention. It was hypothesised that individuals with OCD would demonstrate vigilance, delayed disengagement, and maintenance attentional biases towards OCD-related stimuli relative to a matched control group. Participants with OCD (n = 16) were compared with healthy controls (n = 16) matched by age and gender. Vigilance, disengagement and maintenance biases were measured by recording eye-movements during a free gaze task in which pairs of neutral-OCD and neutral-aversive images were presented. The OCD group demonstrated no evidence of vigilance or delayed disengagement biases toward OCD stimuli but did exhibit a maintenance bias towards OCD and, to a lesser extent, general aversive images. Clinical implications include the assessment of patient attentional biases to aid CBT interventions.

强迫症患者的注意偏差:一项初步的眼动追踪研究
注意偏差在认知行为治疗实践中一直被忽视。本初步研究考察了强迫症临床样本的注意偏倚模式,以期了解其关键机制,从而为评估和干预提供信息。假设相对于匹配的对照组,强迫症患者对强迫症相关刺激表现出警惕性、延迟脱离和维持注意偏差。强迫症患者(n = 16)与按年龄和性别匹配的健康对照组(n = 16)进行比较。在一项自由凝视任务中,研究人员通过记录眼球运动来测量警觉性、脱离性和维持性偏差,该任务中呈现成对的中性强迫症和中性厌恶图像。强迫症组没有表现出对强迫症刺激的警惕性或延迟脱离倾向,但确实表现出对强迫症的维持性偏见,在较小程度上,一般厌恶图像。临床意义包括对患者注意偏倚的评估,以辅助CBT干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信