Acceptability of Noodles Produced from Blends of Wheat, Acha and Soybean Composite Flours

Omeire G.C. , Umeji O.F. , Obasi N.E.
{"title":"Acceptability of Noodles Produced from Blends of Wheat, Acha and Soybean Composite Flours","authors":"Omeire G.C. ,&nbsp;Umeji O.F. ,&nbsp;Obasi N.E.","doi":"10.1016/S0189-7241(15)30093-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Acha (<em>Digitaria exilis</em>) and soybean (<em>Glycine max</em>) were processed into flours and used to substitute wheat flour (<em>Titicum aestivm</em>) as a composite flour at different proportions of 100:0:0 (Wheat); 75:25:25 (Wheat: Acha: Soybean); 75:25 (Wheat: Acha); 75:25 (Wheat: Soybean) and 50:50 (Acha: soybean). The formulated blends were used to produce noodles. The noodles were subjected to proximate analysis, functional properties and sensory evaluation using commercial instant noodles as control. The results revealed that the protein, moisture, ash and fat contents were higher in the formulated samples than in the control. Sample AS (50% Acha and 50% Soybean) had 26.47% protein and was significantly different (p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05) from the control (8.97%). The protein and fat contents increased while carbohydrate decreased with increase in soybean addition to the blend. The functional properties showed that water absorption capacity increased with increase in wheat blend. There were no significant differences (p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05) between the formulated samples in their swelling index and wettability. The result of the sensory evaluation based on a nine point hedonic scale showed that generally apart from the control, noodles from 100% wheat and wheat noodles supplemented with soybean up to 25% were acceptable to the panelists.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19217,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Food Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0189-7241(15)30093-X","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Food Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S018972411530093X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Acha (Digitaria exilis) and soybean (Glycine max) were processed into flours and used to substitute wheat flour (Titicum aestivm) as a composite flour at different proportions of 100:0:0 (Wheat); 75:25:25 (Wheat: Acha: Soybean); 75:25 (Wheat: Acha); 75:25 (Wheat: Soybean) and 50:50 (Acha: soybean). The formulated blends were used to produce noodles. The noodles were subjected to proximate analysis, functional properties and sensory evaluation using commercial instant noodles as control. The results revealed that the protein, moisture, ash and fat contents were higher in the formulated samples than in the control. Sample AS (50% Acha and 50% Soybean) had 26.47% protein and was significantly different (p < 0.05) from the control (8.97%). The protein and fat contents increased while carbohydrate decreased with increase in soybean addition to the blend. The functional properties showed that water absorption capacity increased with increase in wheat blend. There were no significant differences (p < 0.05) between the formulated samples in their swelling index and wettability. The result of the sensory evaluation based on a nine point hedonic scale showed that generally apart from the control, noodles from 100% wheat and wheat noodles supplemented with soybean up to 25% were acceptable to the panelists.

小麦、阿查和大豆复合粉混合制成面条的可接受性
将柞蚕(Digitaria exilis)和大豆(Glycine max)加工成面粉,以100:0:0(小麦)的不同比例替代小麦粉(Titicum aestivm)作为复合面粉;75:25:25(小麦:阿查:大豆);75:25(小麦:亚甲);75:25(小麦:大豆)和50:50(亚查:大豆)。配方混合物被用于生产面条。以商品方便面为对照,对其进行了近似分析、功能特性和感官评价。结果表明,配方样品的蛋白质、水分、灰分和脂肪含量均高于对照。样品AS(50%柞木和50%大豆)蛋白质含量为26.47%,差异显著(p <0.05),低于对照组(8.97%)。随着大豆添加量的增加,蛋白质和脂肪含量增加,碳水化合物含量降低。功能性能表明,随着小麦掺合物掺量的增加,其吸水能力有所提高。无显著性差异(p <配制样品的溶胀指数和润湿性差异为0.05)。基于9分享乐量表的感官评价结果显示,除对照外,100%小麦粉和添加25%大豆的小麦粉均可被小组成员接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信