Viabilidad y Aceptabilidad del Tratamiento Integral Virtual en Trastornos Alimentarios: Perspectiva de Pacientes, Padres y Terapeutas Durante la Pandemia por COVID-19

Q3 Medicine
Maritza Rodríguez Guarin, Juanita Gempeler Rueda, Sergio Mario Castro, María Mercedes Ospina, Carolina Villanueva Betancourth, Juan Pablo Amórtegui, Laura Vázquez
{"title":"Viabilidad y Aceptabilidad del Tratamiento Integral Virtual en Trastornos Alimentarios: Perspectiva de Pacientes, Padres y Terapeutas Durante la Pandemia por COVID-19","authors":"Maritza Rodríguez Guarin,&nbsp;Juanita Gempeler Rueda,&nbsp;Sergio Mario Castro,&nbsp;María Mercedes Ospina,&nbsp;Carolina Villanueva Betancourth,&nbsp;Juan Pablo Amórtegui,&nbsp;Laura Vázquez","doi":"10.1016/j.rcp.2021.07.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Lockdowns and social distancing as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic have brought about the need to continue treatment virtually in patients with Eating Disorders (ED).</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate feasibility, acceptability and adherence to virtual treatment in patients, families and therapists.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Fourteen patients, 10 family members and eight therapists from an intensive outpatient program for ED answered online surveys and a SWOT analysis was performed with the responses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Virtual treatment during lockdown was considered feasible and useful by all respondents. Fear of contagion and the presence of parents in the home were identified as strengths. Parents reported problems with nutritional plan compliance, especially in anorexia patients. Therapists highlighted the importance of methodological adaptations in sessions to improve participation. Adherence to sessions was 100% for family members and 90% for patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Adaptation to a virtual program is a valid and useful option during lockdowns. It improves family participation, but does not replace face-to-face treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52477,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria","volume":"52 4","pages":"Pages 337-344"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rcp.2021.07.011","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034745021001451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background

Lockdowns and social distancing as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic have brought about the need to continue treatment virtually in patients with Eating Disorders (ED).

Objective

To evaluate feasibility, acceptability and adherence to virtual treatment in patients, families and therapists.

Methods

Fourteen patients, 10 family members and eight therapists from an intensive outpatient program for ED answered online surveys and a SWOT analysis was performed with the responses.

Results

Virtual treatment during lockdown was considered feasible and useful by all respondents. Fear of contagion and the presence of parents in the home were identified as strengths. Parents reported problems with nutritional plan compliance, especially in anorexia patients. Therapists highlighted the importance of methodological adaptations in sessions to improve participation. Adherence to sessions was 100% for family members and 90% for patients.

Conclusions

Adaptation to a virtual program is a valid and useful option during lockdowns. It improves family participation, but does not replace face-to-face treatment.

饮食失调虚拟综合治疗的可行性和可接受性:COVID-19大流行期间患者、家长和治疗师的观点
背景2019冠状病毒病大流行导致的封锁和社交距离使得饮食失调(ED)患者需要继续进行虚拟治疗。目的评价虚拟治疗在患者、家属和治疗师中的可行性、可接受性和依从性。方法对某急诊科门诊门诊的14名患者、10名家属和8名治疗师进行在线问卷调查,并对调查结果进行SWOT分析。结果所有被调查者都认为封锁期间的虚拟治疗是可行和有用的。对传染病的恐惧和父母在家的存在被认为是优势。家长报告了营养计划依从性方面的问题,特别是厌食症患者。治疗师强调了在会议中调整方法以提高参与度的重要性。家庭成员的依从性为100%,患者为90%。结论在闭锁期间适应虚拟程序是一种有效和有用的选择。它提高了家庭参与,但不能取代面对面的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria
Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría (RCP) is a quarterly official publication of Colombian Psychiatry Association (March, June, September and December) and its purpose is to spread different the knowledge models that currently constitute the theoretical and practical body of our specialty. Psychiatrists, psychiatric residents, non psychiatric physicians, psychologists, philosophers or other health professionals or persons interested in this area can take part in the magazine. This journal publishes original works, revision or updating articles, case reports of all psychiatry and mental health areas, epistemology, mind philosophy, bioethics and also articles about methodology of investigation and critical reading.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信