«Aprendiendo a aprender» en el Aula Invertida Extendida: una evaluación sobre los efectos de la enseñanza interactiva en el conocimiento y la regulación cognitiva de estudiantes de Medicina

Q3 Medicine
Luis Carlos Domínguez , Claudia Marcela Mora , Jorge Alberto Restrepo
{"title":"«Aprendiendo a aprender» en el Aula Invertida Extendida: una evaluación sobre los efectos de la enseñanza interactiva en el conocimiento y la regulación cognitiva de estudiantes de Medicina","authors":"Luis Carlos Domínguez ,&nbsp;Claudia Marcela Mora ,&nbsp;Jorge Alberto Restrepo","doi":"10.1016/j.rcp.2021.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The evidence regarding the effects of the Inverted Classroom on students’ metacognitive skills is limited. This study evaluates these effects on student perceptions about knowledge and cognitive regulation during a surgical course.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We measured student perceptions before and after a conventional Inverted Classroom in surgery using the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory. We evaluated the mean differences between the scores of the two measurements using Student's t-test (<em>p</em>&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05), and the size of the effect on knowledge and cognitive regulation using Cohen's <em>d</em> test (95%<span>C</span>I).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 158 students (pre-intervention) and 155 students (post-intervention) were included in the analysis. Significant differences were found (<em>p</em>&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05)in, as well as positive effects on, the students’ abilities to know their own learning (declarative knowledge) (<em>d</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.24; 95%CI, 0.02-0.47), to use learning strategies (procedural knowledge) (<em>d</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.19; 95%CI, –0.02 to 0.41) and to understand when and why to use these strategies (conditional knowledge) (<em>d</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.20; 95%CI, –0.01 to 0.42), in addition to the abilities to plan (<em>d</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.31; 95%CI, 0.09-0.53) and to evaluate their learning (<em>d</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.31; 95%CI, 0.08-0.53).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The Inverted Classroom has positive effects on metacognitive skills according to students’ perceptions. Further studies are required that compare these effects with other methodologies for teaching in the classroom and the workplace.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52477,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria","volume":"52 4","pages":"Pages 314-319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034745021001360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction

The evidence regarding the effects of the Inverted Classroom on students’ metacognitive skills is limited. This study evaluates these effects on student perceptions about knowledge and cognitive regulation during a surgical course.

Methods

We measured student perceptions before and after a conventional Inverted Classroom in surgery using the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory. We evaluated the mean differences between the scores of the two measurements using Student's t-test (p< 0.05), and the size of the effect on knowledge and cognitive regulation using Cohen's d test (95%CI).

Results

A total of 158 students (pre-intervention) and 155 students (post-intervention) were included in the analysis. Significant differences were found (p< 0.05)in, as well as positive effects on, the students’ abilities to know their own learning (declarative knowledge) (d = 0.24; 95%CI, 0.02-0.47), to use learning strategies (procedural knowledge) (d = 0.19; 95%CI, –0.02 to 0.41) and to understand when and why to use these strategies (conditional knowledge) (d = 0.20; 95%CI, –0.01 to 0.42), in addition to the abilities to plan (d = 0.31; 95%CI, 0.09-0.53) and to evaluate their learning (d = 0.31; 95%CI, 0.08-0.53).

Conclusions

The Inverted Classroom has positive effects on metacognitive skills according to students’ perceptions. Further studies are required that compare these effects with other methodologies for teaching in the classroom and the workplace.

扩展倒置课堂中的“学会学习”:互动教学对医学生知识和认知调节效果的评价
关于翻转课堂对学生元认知技能影响的证据是有限的。本研究评估了这些对学生在外科课程中对知识和认知调节的感知的影响。方法采用元认知意识量表测量学生在常规翻转课堂手术前后的认知。我们使用学生t检验(p<使用Cohen's d检验对知识和认知调节的影响大小(95%CI)。结果共有158名学生(干预前)和155名学生(干预后)参与分析。发现显著差异(p<对学生对自己学习(陈述性知识)的认知能力有显著的正向影响(d = 0.24;95%CI, 0.02-0.47),使用学习策略(程序性知识)(d = 0.19;95%CI, -0.02至0.41),并了解何时以及为什么使用这些策略(条件知识)(d = 0.20;95%CI, -0.01 ~ 0.42),此外还有计划能力(d = 0.31;95%CI, 0.09-0.53),并评估其学习情况(d = 0.31;95%可信区间,0.08 - -0.53)。结论倒置课堂对学生的元认知技能有正向影响。需要进一步的研究将这些效果与课堂和工作场所的其他教学方法进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria
Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría (RCP) is a quarterly official publication of Colombian Psychiatry Association (March, June, September and December) and its purpose is to spread different the knowledge models that currently constitute the theoretical and practical body of our specialty. Psychiatrists, psychiatric residents, non psychiatric physicians, psychologists, philosophers or other health professionals or persons interested in this area can take part in the magazine. This journal publishes original works, revision or updating articles, case reports of all psychiatry and mental health areas, epistemology, mind philosophy, bioethics and also articles about methodology of investigation and critical reading.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信