Why can’t smokers quit? Longitudinal study of smokers in the US using the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) waves 1 to 5

Q1 Psychology
Nantaporn Plurphanswat , Brad Rodu
{"title":"Why can’t smokers quit? Longitudinal study of smokers in the US using the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) waves 1 to 5","authors":"Nantaporn Plurphanswat ,&nbsp;Brad Rodu","doi":"10.1016/j.abrep.2023.100517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Most adult cigarette smokers have tried unsuccessfully to quit. We followed participants in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study through five waves (2013–2019), comparing smoking, quit behaviors and other characteristics between persistent smokers and those who became and stayed former smokers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The main analysis employed treatment effects to estimate mean differences in smoking and quitting behaviors among smoker groups. Logistic models were used to estimate predicted means based on continuing smokers’ demographic characteristics to ensure that any differences in outcomes did not come from differences in demographic characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among smokers enrolled in PATH Wave 1, 68 % persisted in all subsequent waves. Compared with smokers who quit after Wave 1, persistent smokers had remarkably stable smoking behaviors, including significantly higher proportions of everyday smokers, consuming 10+ cigarettes per day, and smoking within 30 min of waking up. Persistent smokers were also less likely to try to quit completely, and experienced more negative symptoms from nicotine withdrawal. They also showed less interest in quitting and were less confident of being successful than smokers who quit by the next wave. Neither electronic nicotine delivery systems nor menthol played a role in continued smoking or quitting.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The characteristics and behaviors of persistent smokers in this study were stable over five waves of data collection during a six-year period, suggesting that these smokers need new cessation options.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38040,"journal":{"name":"Addictive Behaviors Reports","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100517"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853223000391/pdfft?md5=bc826ea2f94f19b6be0333506aa92bb1&pid=1-s2.0-S2352853223000391-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive Behaviors Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853223000391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Most adult cigarette smokers have tried unsuccessfully to quit. We followed participants in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study through five waves (2013–2019), comparing smoking, quit behaviors and other characteristics between persistent smokers and those who became and stayed former smokers.

Methods

The main analysis employed treatment effects to estimate mean differences in smoking and quitting behaviors among smoker groups. Logistic models were used to estimate predicted means based on continuing smokers’ demographic characteristics to ensure that any differences in outcomes did not come from differences in demographic characteristics.

Results

Among smokers enrolled in PATH Wave 1, 68 % persisted in all subsequent waves. Compared with smokers who quit after Wave 1, persistent smokers had remarkably stable smoking behaviors, including significantly higher proportions of everyday smokers, consuming 10+ cigarettes per day, and smoking within 30 min of waking up. Persistent smokers were also less likely to try to quit completely, and experienced more negative symptoms from nicotine withdrawal. They also showed less interest in quitting and were less confident of being successful than smokers who quit by the next wave. Neither electronic nicotine delivery systems nor menthol played a role in continued smoking or quitting.

Conclusions

The characteristics and behaviors of persistent smokers in this study were stable over five waves of data collection during a six-year period, suggesting that these smokers need new cessation options.

为什么吸烟者不能戒烟?使用烟草与健康人口评估(PATH)第1至5波对美国吸烟者进行纵向研究
大多数成年吸烟者都曾尝试戒烟失败。我们通过五波(2013-2019)跟踪了烟草与健康人口评估(PATH)研究的参与者,比较了持续吸烟者与成为和保持前吸烟者之间的吸烟、戒烟行为和其他特征。方法主要分析采用治疗效果来估计吸烟人群吸烟和戒烟行为的平均差异。使用Logistic模型来估计基于持续吸烟者人口统计学特征的预测均值,以确保任何结果的差异不是来自人口统计学特征的差异。结果在第1期纳入的吸烟者中,68%的人在所有后续随访中持续存在。与第一次戒烟后戒烟的吸烟者相比,持续吸烟者的吸烟行为非常稳定,包括每天吸烟的比例明显更高,每天吸烟10支以上,并且在醒来后30分钟内吸烟。持续吸烟者也不太可能尝试完全戒烟,并且经历了更多尼古丁戒断的负面症状。与那些在下一波戒烟浪潮中戒烟的人相比,他们对戒烟的兴趣更低,对成功的信心也更低。电子尼古丁输送系统和薄荷醇对持续吸烟或戒烟都没有作用。结论本研究中持续吸烟者的特征和行为在六年期间的五波数据收集中是稳定的,这表明这些吸烟者需要新的戒烟选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Addictive Behaviors Reports
Addictive Behaviors Reports Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Addictive Behaviors Reports is an open-access and peer reviewed online-only journal offering an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research in addictive behaviors. The journal accepts submissions that are scientifically sound on all forms of addictive behavior (alcohol, drugs, gambling, Internet, nicotine and technology) with a primary focus on behavioral and psychosocial research. The emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. We are particularly interested in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research. Studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry as well as scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are also very much encouraged. We also welcome multimedia submissions that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信