Comparative analysis of tillage in sandy clay loam soil by free rolling and powered disc harrow

Q2 Engineering
Ganesh Upadhyay, Hifjur Raheman
{"title":"Comparative analysis of tillage in sandy clay loam soil by free rolling and powered disc harrow","authors":"Ganesh Upadhyay,&nbsp;Hifjur Raheman","doi":"10.1016/j.eaef.2018.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>A single-acting (3 × 3) 510 mm powered disc harrow was developed to achieve timeliness in operation in the extensively followed rice-wheat cropping system by reducing tillage passes with the proper incorporation of residues left after rice cultivation. Experiments were carried out at forward speeds of 3.69, 4.67 and 6.55 km h</span><sup>−1</sup><span><span> corresponding to speed ratios of 4.74, 3.75 and 2.67, respectively and at 90, 120 and 140 mm operating depths in sandy clay loam soil having an average </span>moisture content of 12 ± 0.75% (db) and cone index of 930 ± 40 kPa. Its comparison was also made with conventional free rolling disc tilling which generally requires more passes. Optimum performance in terms of tillage performance index was achieved at speed ratio of 3.75 with a reduction in draft, slip, and clod size by 30–36%, 53.47–72.25% and 39.20–60.73%, respectively at the cost of 14.28–18.40% increase in fuel consumption (l ha</span><sup>−1</sup><span>) when operated at depth of 120 mm as compared to free rolling mode indicating better energy utilization. Effect of multiple passes of tilling on soil compaction<span> beneath the tillage depth (100–200 mm) was also studied from separate experiments. Soil compaction was observed to be 4.71–7.17% and 5.21–6.86% lesser as compared to that obtained with rotavator after first and second passes of tillage, respectively. However, it was about 0.38–3.00% and 3.00–5.32% more compared to free rolling disc tilling after first and second passes, respectively. Reduced number of passes required for preparing seedbed with powered disc justifies its use for carrying out the tillage.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":38965,"journal":{"name":"Engineering in Agriculture, Environment and Food","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.eaef.2018.11.001","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering in Agriculture, Environment and Food","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1881836618300247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

A single-acting (3 × 3) 510 mm powered disc harrow was developed to achieve timeliness in operation in the extensively followed rice-wheat cropping system by reducing tillage passes with the proper incorporation of residues left after rice cultivation. Experiments were carried out at forward speeds of 3.69, 4.67 and 6.55 km h−1 corresponding to speed ratios of 4.74, 3.75 and 2.67, respectively and at 90, 120 and 140 mm operating depths in sandy clay loam soil having an average moisture content of 12 ± 0.75% (db) and cone index of 930 ± 40 kPa. Its comparison was also made with conventional free rolling disc tilling which generally requires more passes. Optimum performance in terms of tillage performance index was achieved at speed ratio of 3.75 with a reduction in draft, slip, and clod size by 30–36%, 53.47–72.25% and 39.20–60.73%, respectively at the cost of 14.28–18.40% increase in fuel consumption (l ha−1) when operated at depth of 120 mm as compared to free rolling mode indicating better energy utilization. Effect of multiple passes of tilling on soil compaction beneath the tillage depth (100–200 mm) was also studied from separate experiments. Soil compaction was observed to be 4.71–7.17% and 5.21–6.86% lesser as compared to that obtained with rotavator after first and second passes of tillage, respectively. However, it was about 0.38–3.00% and 3.00–5.32% more compared to free rolling disc tilling after first and second passes, respectively. Reduced number of passes required for preparing seedbed with powered disc justifies its use for carrying out the tillage.

自由滚犁与动力盘耙耕作砂质粘土壤土的比较分析
研制了一种单作用(3 × 3)510 mm动力盘耙,通过减少耕作次数和适当地加入水稻栽培后的残留物,在广泛采用的稻麦种植系统中实现了作业的及时性。在平均含水率为12 ± 0.75% (db),锥指数为930 ± 40 kPa的砂质粘土壤土中,分别在3.69、4.67和6.55 km h−1(速比分别为4.74、3.75和2.67)和90、120和140 mm工作深度下进行试验。并与常规自由滚盘耕作法进行了比较,后者通常需要更多的道次。在速比为3.75时获得了最佳的耕作性能指标,吃水、滑差和土块尺寸分别减少了30-36%、53.47-72.25%和39.20-60.73%,而在120 mm深度时,与自由滚动模式相比,燃料消耗(l ha−1)增加了14.28-18.40%,表明能量利用率更高。在100 ~ 200 mm耕深范围内,通过单独试验研究了多次耕作对土壤压实的影响。第一次和第二次耕作后,土壤压实度分别比旋耕机低4.71 ~ 7.17%和5.21 ~ 6.86%。但与自由滚盘翻耕相比,第一次和第二次翻耕分别高出0.38-3.00%和3.00-5.32%。减少了用动力圆盘准备苗床所需的通道数,证明了使用它进行耕作是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering in Agriculture, Environment and Food
Engineering in Agriculture, Environment and Food Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: Engineering in Agriculture, Environment and Food (EAEF) is devoted to the advancement and dissemination of scientific and technical knowledge concerning agricultural machinery, tillage, terramechanics, precision farming, agricultural instrumentation, sensors, bio-robotics, systems automation, processing of agricultural products and foods, quality evaluation and food safety, waste treatment and management, environmental control, energy utilization agricultural systems engineering, bio-informatics, computer simulation, computational mechanics, farm work systems and mechanized cropping. It is an international English E-journal published and distributed by the Asian Agricultural and Biological Engineering Association (AABEA). Authors should submit the manuscript file written by MS Word through a web site. The manuscript must be approved by the author''s organization prior to submission if required. Contact the societies which you belong to, if you have any question on manuscript submission or on the Journal EAEF.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信