Standard Triple Therapy as a Remedy for Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Faezeh Kiani, Sara Khademolhosseini, Mobina Fathi, Arian Tavasol, Jasem Mohammadi, Majid Dousti, Jalal Eshagh Hoseini
{"title":"Standard Triple Therapy as a Remedy for Treatment of <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.","authors":"Faezeh Kiani,&nbsp;Sara Khademolhosseini,&nbsp;Mobina Fathi,&nbsp;Arian Tavasol,&nbsp;Jasem Mohammadi,&nbsp;Majid Dousti,&nbsp;Jalal Eshagh Hoseini","doi":"10.2174/2772432817666220317152544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>H. pylori infection, one of the most prevalent infectious diseases, can cause severe health problems. Therefore, it seems to be crucial to effectively counter the H. pylori infection with a well-tolerated eradication regimen. However, since the discovery of H. pylori, the optimal treatment for this disease is still unclear and remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present study aims to estimate the efficacy of standard triple therapy for eradicating H. pylori by systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified randomized clinical trials [RCTs] involving triple therapy PPIAC/M [Omeprazole, Amoxicillin, and Clarithromycin/Metronidazole] in the first-line treatment of H. pylori infection and reported eradication rate through electronic and manual searches in PubMed, ISI, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register, and Scopus databases. Data were analyzed using the random effect model, and the Cochrane Q test and I<sup>2</sup> statistics were used to assess heterogeneity. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven RCTs [PPIAC: 40 RCTs and PPIAM: 7 RCTs] with 4,938 patients selected as eligible for the final analysis. Per-protocol eradication rate was 80% [95% CI: 74-84] and 80% [95% CI: 73-87] for PPIAC and PPIAM regimens, respectively. The eradication rate for PPIAC and PPIAM regimens was 83% [95% CI: 70%-95%] and 83% [95% CI: 75%-90%] and also 77% [95% CI: 68%- 88%] and 78% [95% CI: 69%-88%], respectively. Based on different treatment durations, the pooled estimates of PP [per-protocol analysis] treatment outcomes were found the highest in 14-day treatment in both regimens.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Standard triple therapy PPIAC/M is recommended to be an effective and safe regimen, although adequate data are not available to suggest PPIAC/M as the first-line therapy for H. Pylori infection. Interestingly, our analysis demonstrated that PPIAC/M regimens were more effective in Asian than European populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":29871,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2772432817666220317152544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: H. pylori infection, one of the most prevalent infectious diseases, can cause severe health problems. Therefore, it seems to be crucial to effectively counter the H. pylori infection with a well-tolerated eradication regimen. However, since the discovery of H. pylori, the optimal treatment for this disease is still unclear and remains controversial.

Objectives: The present study aims to estimate the efficacy of standard triple therapy for eradicating H. pylori by systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: We identified randomized clinical trials [RCTs] involving triple therapy PPIAC/M [Omeprazole, Amoxicillin, and Clarithromycin/Metronidazole] in the first-line treatment of H. pylori infection and reported eradication rate through electronic and manual searches in PubMed, ISI, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register, and Scopus databases. Data were analyzed using the random effect model, and the Cochrane Q test and I2 statistics were used to assess heterogeneity. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 12.

Results: Forty-seven RCTs [PPIAC: 40 RCTs and PPIAM: 7 RCTs] with 4,938 patients selected as eligible for the final analysis. Per-protocol eradication rate was 80% [95% CI: 74-84] and 80% [95% CI: 73-87] for PPIAC and PPIAM regimens, respectively. The eradication rate for PPIAC and PPIAM regimens was 83% [95% CI: 70%-95%] and 83% [95% CI: 75%-90%] and also 77% [95% CI: 68%- 88%] and 78% [95% CI: 69%-88%], respectively. Based on different treatment durations, the pooled estimates of PP [per-protocol analysis] treatment outcomes were found the highest in 14-day treatment in both regimens.

Conclusion: Standard triple therapy PPIAC/M is recommended to be an effective and safe regimen, although adequate data are not available to suggest PPIAC/M as the first-line therapy for H. Pylori infection. Interestingly, our analysis demonstrated that PPIAC/M regimens were more effective in Asian than European populations.

标准三联疗法作为治疗幽门螺杆菌感染的补救措施:随机临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:幽门螺杆菌感染是最常见的传染病之一,可引起严重的健康问题。因此,通过耐受性良好的根除方案来有效对抗幽门螺杆菌感染似乎至关重要。然而,自从发现幽门螺杆菌以来,这种疾病的最佳治疗方法仍然不清楚,并且仍然存在争议。目的:本研究旨在通过系统评价和荟萃分析来评估标准三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效。方法:通过PubMed、ISI、EMBASE、Cochrane Central Register和Scopus数据库的电子和手动检索,我们确定了涉及PPIAC/M(奥美拉唑、阿莫西林和克拉霉素/甲硝唑)三联疗法一线治疗幽门螺杆菌感染的随机临床试验[rct],并报告了根除率。采用随机效应模型分析资料,采用Cochrane Q检验和I2统计量评估异质性。使用STATA version 12进行统计分析。结果:47项随机对照试验[PPIAC: 40项随机对照试验,PPIAM: 7项随机对照试验]共4938例患者入选最终分析。PPIAC和PPIAM方案的每方案根除率分别为80% [95% CI: 74-84]和80% [95% CI: 73-87]。PPIAC和PPIAM方案的根除率分别为83% [95% CI: 70%-95%]和83% [95% CI: 75%-90%], 77% [95% CI: 68%- 88%]和78% [95% CI: 69%-88%]。根据不同的治疗持续时间,两种方案的PP[按方案分析]治疗结果的汇总估计值在14天的治疗中最高。结论:标准三联疗法PPIAC/M被推荐为一种有效和安全的方案,尽管没有足够的数据表明PPIAC/M作为幽门螺杆菌感染的一线治疗。有趣的是,我们的分析表明PPIAC/M方案在亚洲人群中比在欧洲人群中更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
55
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信