Randomized Clinical Trials on the Efficacy and Safety of Tocilizumab in Subjects with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Adel Sadeq, Asim Ahmed Elnour, Azza Ramadan, Israa Yousif El Khidir, Judit Don, Abdulla Al Amoodi, Nadia Al Mazrouei, Mohamed A Baraka, Farah Hamad Farah, Maisoun Alkaabi
{"title":"Randomized Clinical Trials on the Efficacy and Safety of Tocilizumab in Subjects with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Adel Sadeq,&nbsp;Asim Ahmed Elnour,&nbsp;Azza Ramadan,&nbsp;Israa Yousif El Khidir,&nbsp;Judit Don,&nbsp;Abdulla Al Amoodi,&nbsp;Nadia Al Mazrouei,&nbsp;Mohamed A Baraka,&nbsp;Farah Hamad Farah,&nbsp;Maisoun Alkaabi","doi":"10.2174/2772432817666220202115623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current therapy of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is confronted with many challenges such as inadequate response, infection, and treatment failure.</p><p><strong>Aim and objective: </strong>The main objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) in subjects with RA using the available evidence from published randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current systematic review was performed on nine randomized controlled trials from 2002 to 2016 for TCZ in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis. The primary outcomes were the clinical improvement in American College Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) or Disease Activity Score remission (DAS28), in addition to other outcomes such as ACR50 and ACR70 in the intention-to-treat population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We have conducted a systematic review on nine randomized controlled trials, with 4129 [100%] enrolled, of which 3248 [78.7%] were on the intention-to-treat. 2147 (66.1%) were treated with TCZ and 1101 (33.9%) have had received placebo or methotrexate or other conventional Disease- Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs (cDMARD) or biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs). In subjects taking TCZ with or without concomitant methotrexate, compared to placebo, subjects treated with TCZ 4 or 8 mg/kg were substantially and statistically significantly more likely than placebo or methotrexate to achieve the ACR20 and/or DAS28. There were no statistically significant differences in serious adverse events such as serious infection; however, subjects on TCZ were more likely to have increased lipid profiles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TCZ mono-therapy or in combination with methotrexate is valuable in diminishing rheumatoid arthritis disease activity and improving disability. Treatment with TCZ was associated with a significant surge in cholesterol levels but no serious adverse effects. Randomized clinical trials with safety as the primary outcome are warranted to report these safety issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":29871,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology","volume":"18 1","pages":"64-87"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2772432817666220202115623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The current therapy of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is confronted with many challenges such as inadequate response, infection, and treatment failure.

Aim and objective: The main objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) in subjects with RA using the available evidence from published randomized controlled trials.

Methods: The current systematic review was performed on nine randomized controlled trials from 2002 to 2016 for TCZ in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis. The primary outcomes were the clinical improvement in American College Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) or Disease Activity Score remission (DAS28), in addition to other outcomes such as ACR50 and ACR70 in the intention-to-treat population.

Results: We have conducted a systematic review on nine randomized controlled trials, with 4129 [100%] enrolled, of which 3248 [78.7%] were on the intention-to-treat. 2147 (66.1%) were treated with TCZ and 1101 (33.9%) have had received placebo or methotrexate or other conventional Disease- Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs (cDMARD) or biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs). In subjects taking TCZ with or without concomitant methotrexate, compared to placebo, subjects treated with TCZ 4 or 8 mg/kg were substantially and statistically significantly more likely than placebo or methotrexate to achieve the ACR20 and/or DAS28. There were no statistically significant differences in serious adverse events such as serious infection; however, subjects on TCZ were more likely to have increased lipid profiles.

Conclusion: TCZ mono-therapy or in combination with methotrexate is valuable in diminishing rheumatoid arthritis disease activity and improving disability. Treatment with TCZ was associated with a significant surge in cholesterol levels but no serious adverse effects. Randomized clinical trials with safety as the primary outcome are warranted to report these safety issues.

Tocilizumab在类风湿关节炎患者中的疗效和安全性的随机临床试验:一项系统综述。
背景:目前类风湿关节炎(RA)的治疗面临着许多挑战,如反应不足、感染和治疗失败。目的和目的:主要目的是利用已发表的随机对照试验的现有证据,评估tocilizumab (TCZ)对RA患者的疗效和安全性。方法:本系统回顾了2002 - 2016年9项类风湿性关节炎患者的TCZ随机对照试验。主要结果是美国风湿病学会的临床改善20% (ACR20)或疾病活动评分缓解(DAS28),以及意向治疗人群的ACR50和ACR70等其他结果。结果:我们对9项随机对照试验进行了系统评价,纳入4129项[100%],其中3248项[78.7%]为意向治疗。2147例(66.1%)接受了TCZ治疗,1101例(33.9%)接受了安慰剂或甲氨蝶呤或其他常规疾病缓解抗风湿药物(cDMARD)或生物疾病缓解抗风湿药物(bDMARDs)。与安慰剂相比,在服用TCZ或不同时服用甲氨蝶呤的受试者中,服用TCZ 4或8mg /kg的受试者比安慰剂或甲氨蝶呤更有可能达到ACR20和/或DAS28。严重感染等严重不良事件发生率差异无统计学意义;然而,服用TCZ的受试者更有可能出现血脂升高。结论:TCZ单用或联用甲氨蝶呤对降低类风湿关节炎疾病活动性和改善致残性具有重要意义。用TCZ治疗与胆固醇水平显著升高有关,但没有严重的不良反应。以安全性为主要结果的随机临床试验有必要报告这些安全性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
55
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信