Accuratezza e precisione di un nuovo sistema di chirurgia guidata: studio clinico multicentrico

T. Testori , A. Parenti , A. Motroni , M. Rinaldi , G. Luongo , R. Garrone , R. Cocchetto , G. Mandelaris , A. Rosenfeld , M. Robiony
{"title":"Accuratezza e precisione di un nuovo sistema di chirurgia guidata: studio clinico multicentrico","authors":"T. Testori ,&nbsp;A. Parenti ,&nbsp;A. Motroni ,&nbsp;M. Rinaldi ,&nbsp;G. Luongo ,&nbsp;R. Garrone ,&nbsp;R. Cocchetto ,&nbsp;G. Mandelaris ,&nbsp;A. Rosenfeld ,&nbsp;M. Robiony","doi":"10.1016/j.ios.2012.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of a new guided surgery system.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Twenty-six patients were treated in 8 centers with a total 116 implants placed. The surgical guides were bone supported, mucosal or teeth supported. At the end of the surgical phase, a post-op CT scan was taken to evaluate the discrepancies between the virtual and the clinical implant position.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean values regarding the 3D implant position are in line with the mean values reported in the literature. Bone supported and mucosal supported guides are more precise than dental or dental-mucosal supported guides, however, the differences are not statistically significant. Discrepancies at the implant apex, at platform level and at the angle between virtual and clinical position were evaluated by superimposing a pre-op CT scan to a post-op CT scan.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The accuracy of the guided surgery system used is in line with the data of the literature. A good diagnostic phase is recommended and it is very important to plan the implant position with a safety distance from the anatomical structures of at least 2<!--> <!-->mm. In clinical cases of immediate loading it is recommended to reline a provisional prosthesis to compensate the discrepancies between the virtual and the clinical implant position.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100732,"journal":{"name":"Italian Oral Surgery","volume":"11 5","pages":"Pages 187-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ios.2012.02.001","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Oral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1827245212000645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of a new guided surgery system.

Materials and methods

Twenty-six patients were treated in 8 centers with a total 116 implants placed. The surgical guides were bone supported, mucosal or teeth supported. At the end of the surgical phase, a post-op CT scan was taken to evaluate the discrepancies between the virtual and the clinical implant position.

Results

The mean values regarding the 3D implant position are in line with the mean values reported in the literature. Bone supported and mucosal supported guides are more precise than dental or dental-mucosal supported guides, however, the differences are not statistically significant. Discrepancies at the implant apex, at platform level and at the angle between virtual and clinical position were evaluated by superimposing a pre-op CT scan to a post-op CT scan.

Conclusions

The accuracy of the guided surgery system used is in line with the data of the literature. A good diagnostic phase is recommended and it is very important to plan the implant position with a safety distance from the anatomical structures of at least 2 mm. In clinical cases of immediate loading it is recommended to reline a provisional prosthesis to compensate the discrepancies between the virtual and the clinical implant position.

一种新的定向手术系统的准确性和精确性:多中心临床研究
目的评价一种新型引导手术系统的准确性。材料与方法在8个中心对26例患者进行治疗,共放置116颗种植体。手术指南采用骨支撑、粘膜或牙齿支撑。在手术阶段结束时,进行术后CT扫描以评估虚拟植入物和临床植入物位置之间的差异。结果三维种植体位置的平均值与文献报道的平均值一致。骨支持和粘膜支持的导向器比牙科或牙科-粘膜支持的导向器更精确,然而,差异没有统计学意义。通过术前CT扫描和术后CT扫描的叠加来评估种植体顶点、平台水平和虚拟位置与临床位置之间的角度差异。结论所使用的引导手术系统的准确性与文献数据相符。建议有一个良好的诊断阶段,规划种植体位置与解剖结构保持至少2mm的安全距离非常重要。在临床病例中,建议立即加载一个临时假体,以补偿虚拟和临床种植体位置之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信