Emergency robotic colorectal surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective case series study

Q3 Medicine
Vicky Maertens , Samuel Stefan , Emma Rawlinson , Chris Ball , Paul Gibbs , Stuart Mercer , Jim S. Khan
{"title":"Emergency robotic colorectal surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective case series study","authors":"Vicky Maertens ,&nbsp;Samuel Stefan ,&nbsp;Emma Rawlinson ,&nbsp;Chris Ball ,&nbsp;Paul Gibbs ,&nbsp;Stuart Mercer ,&nbsp;Jim S. Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.lers.2022.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>While interest in elective robotic surgery is growing, use in emergency setting remains limited due to challenges posed by sicker patients, advanced pathology and logistical issues. During the COVID-19 pandemic, robotic surgery could provide the benefit of having the surgeon away from the bedside and reducing the number of directly exposed medical staff. The objective of this study was to report patient outcomes and initial learning experience of emergency robotic colorectal surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A case series study was conducted, including patients undergoing emergency robotic colorectal surgery between February 2020 and February 2021 at Queen Alexandra Hospital in Portsmouth, UK. Patient data were collected from an ethics approved prospective database. Patient demographics, operative time, conversions and postoperative complications were recorded. In addition, readmissions, length of stay and short-term oncological outcomes were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Ten patients with median age 64 y (range, 36–83 y) were included. Four patients had robotic complete mesocolic resection for obstructing cancers. Six had colorectal resections for benign disease in emergency setting. All were R0 with a mean lymph node harvest of 54 ± 13. Mean operative time was 249 ± 117 min, the median length of stay was 9.4 d (range, 5–22 d). Only one patient was given a temporary diverting ileostomy. There were no grade III/V complications and no 30-day mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Provided an experienced team and peri-operative planning, emergency robotic colorectal surgery can achieve favorable outcomes with benefits of radical lymph node dissection in oncological cases and avoidance of diverting stoma.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":32893,"journal":{"name":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 57-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900922000226/pdfft?md5=1dfd7cc4ce1f428dc9390cc9c8737968&pid=1-s2.0-S2468900922000226-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900922000226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective

While interest in elective robotic surgery is growing, use in emergency setting remains limited due to challenges posed by sicker patients, advanced pathology and logistical issues. During the COVID-19 pandemic, robotic surgery could provide the benefit of having the surgeon away from the bedside and reducing the number of directly exposed medical staff. The objective of this study was to report patient outcomes and initial learning experience of emergency robotic colorectal surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

A case series study was conducted, including patients undergoing emergency robotic colorectal surgery between February 2020 and February 2021 at Queen Alexandra Hospital in Portsmouth, UK. Patient data were collected from an ethics approved prospective database. Patient demographics, operative time, conversions and postoperative complications were recorded. In addition, readmissions, length of stay and short-term oncological outcomes were analyzed.

Results

Ten patients with median age 64 y (range, 36–83 y) were included. Four patients had robotic complete mesocolic resection for obstructing cancers. Six had colorectal resections for benign disease in emergency setting. All were R0 with a mean lymph node harvest of 54 ± 13. Mean operative time was 249 ± 117 min, the median length of stay was 9.4 d (range, 5–22 d). Only one patient was given a temporary diverting ileostomy. There were no grade III/V complications and no 30-day mortality.

Conclusions

Provided an experienced team and peri-operative planning, emergency robotic colorectal surgery can achieve favorable outcomes with benefits of radical lymph node dissection in oncological cases and avoidance of diverting stoma.

COVID-19大流行期间紧急机器人结直肠手术:回顾性病例系列研究
虽然人们对选择性机器人手术的兴趣越来越大,但由于病情较重的患者、晚期病理和后勤问题带来的挑战,在急诊环境中的应用仍然有限。在COVID-19大流行期间,机器人手术可以让外科医生远离病床,减少直接接触的医务人员的数量。本研究的目的是报告COVID-19大流行期间紧急机器人结肠直肠手术的患者结果和初步学习经验。方法进行了一项病例系列研究,包括2020年2月至2021年2月在英国朴茨茅斯亚历山德拉皇后医院接受紧急机器人结肠直肠手术的患者。患者数据从经伦理批准的前瞻性数据库中收集。记录患者人口统计学、手术时间、转诊和术后并发症。此外,还分析了再入院率、住院时间和短期肿瘤预后。结果纳入10例患者,中位年龄64岁(范围36-83岁)。4例梗阻性癌症患者采用机器人全肠系膜切除术。6例在紧急情况下因良性疾病切除结肠直肠。所有患者均为R0,平均淋巴结切除54±13。平均手术时间249±117 min,中位住院时间9.4 d(范围5 ~ 22 d),仅有1例患者行临时回肠造口术。无III/V级并发症,无30天死亡率。结论在经验丰富的团队和围手术期计划的支持下,急诊机器人结直肠手术可以获得良好的结果,不仅有利于肿瘤病例的根治性淋巴结清扫,而且避免了瘘的转移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery
Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery minimally invasive surgery-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery aims to provide an academic exchange platform for minimally invasive surgery at an international level. We seek out and publish the excellent original articles, reviews and editorials as well as exciting new techniques to promote the academic development. Topics of interests include, but are not limited to: ▪ Minimally invasive clinical research mainly in General Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, Urology, Neurosurgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, Gastroenterology, Orthopedics, Colorectal Surgery, Otolaryngology, etc.; ▪ Basic research in minimally invasive surgery; ▪ Research of techniques and equipments in minimally invasive surgery, and application of laparoscopy, endoscopy, robot and medical imaging; ▪ Development of medical education in minimally invasive surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信