Reshaping global policies for circular economy

Xianlai Zeng , Oladele A. Ogunseitan , Shinichiro Nakamura , Sangwon Suh , Ulrich Kral , Jinhui Li , Yong Geng
{"title":"Reshaping global policies for circular economy","authors":"Xianlai Zeng ,&nbsp;Oladele A. Ogunseitan ,&nbsp;Shinichiro Nakamura ,&nbsp;Sangwon Suh ,&nbsp;Ulrich Kral ,&nbsp;Jinhui Li ,&nbsp;Yong Geng","doi":"10.1016/j.cec.2022.100003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Circular economy is recognized as a powerful integrative framework envisioned to solve societal problems linked to environmental pollution and resource depletion. Its adoption is rapidly reforming manufacturing, production, consumption, and recycling across various segments of the economy. However, circular economy may not always be effective or even desirable owing to the spatiotemporal dimensions of environmental risk of materials, and variability of global policies. Circular flows involving toxic materials may impose a high risk on the environment and public health such that overemphasis on anthropogenic circularity is not desirable. Moreover, waste flows at a global scale might result in an uneven distribution of risks and costs associated with a circular economy. Among other benefits, circular economy needs to generate environmental advantages, energy savings, and reductions of greenhouse gas emissions. Recent attempts to implement the carbon neutrality strategy globally will likely push the circular economy further into more economic sectors, but challenges remain in implementing and enforcing international policies across national boundaries. The United Nations Basel Convention on the Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Waste and their disposal is used here as an example to illustrate the challenges and to propose a way forward for anthropogenic circularity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100245,"journal":{"name":"Circular Economy","volume":"1 1","pages":"Article 100003"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773167722000036/pdfft?md5=396b1902acf2092419dc0cb71b671574&pid=1-s2.0-S2773167722000036-main.pdf","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circular Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773167722000036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Circular economy is recognized as a powerful integrative framework envisioned to solve societal problems linked to environmental pollution and resource depletion. Its adoption is rapidly reforming manufacturing, production, consumption, and recycling across various segments of the economy. However, circular economy may not always be effective or even desirable owing to the spatiotemporal dimensions of environmental risk of materials, and variability of global policies. Circular flows involving toxic materials may impose a high risk on the environment and public health such that overemphasis on anthropogenic circularity is not desirable. Moreover, waste flows at a global scale might result in an uneven distribution of risks and costs associated with a circular economy. Among other benefits, circular economy needs to generate environmental advantages, energy savings, and reductions of greenhouse gas emissions. Recent attempts to implement the carbon neutrality strategy globally will likely push the circular economy further into more economic sectors, but challenges remain in implementing and enforcing international policies across national boundaries. The United Nations Basel Convention on the Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Waste and their disposal is used here as an example to illustrate the challenges and to propose a way forward for anthropogenic circularity.

重塑全球循环经济政策
循环经济被认为是一个强大的综合框架,旨在解决与环境污染和资源枯竭有关的社会问题。它的采用正在迅速改变经济各个部门的制造、生产、消费和回收。然而,由于材料环境风险的时空维度和全球政策的可变性,循环经济可能并不总是有效甚至可取的。涉及有毒物质的循环流动可能对环境和公共健康造成高风险,因此不应过分强调人为循环。此外,全球范围的废物流动可能导致与循环经济有关的风险和成本分布不均。在其他好处中,循环经济需要产生环境优势、节约能源和减少温室气体排放。最近在全球范围内实施碳中和战略的尝试可能会将循环经济进一步推向更多的经济部门,但在跨国界实施和执行国际政策方面仍然存在挑战。本文以《联合国关于危险废物越境转移及其处置的巴塞尔公约》为例,说明所面临的挑战,并提出人为循环的前进方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信